Effects of cannabidiol on risky decision-making and autonomic function in alcohol use disorder.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Ellen McGuire, Tristan Hurzeler, Warren Logge, Joshua Watt, Iain S McGregor, Anastasia Suraev, Paul S Haber, Kirsten C Morley
{"title":"Effects of cannabidiol on risky decision-making and autonomic function in alcohol use disorder.","authors":"Ellen McGuire, Tristan Hurzeler, Warren Logge, Joshua Watt, Iain S McGregor, Anastasia Suraev, Paul S Haber, Kirsten C Morley","doi":"10.1093/alcalc/agag068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine the effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on psychophysiological responding and risky decision-making in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, 18 participants with AUD completed the Columbia Card Task (CCT) following administration of CBD and placebo. Skin conductance responses (SCR) and high-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV) were assessed as indices of autonomic responding during task performance. Risk-taking was indexed by the number of cards selected on the CCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CBD did not significantly affect SCR (P = .16, pBH = .326) or risky decision-making on the CCT (P > .63, pBH = 0.67). However, CBD significantly increased HF-HRV (β = 0.53, SE = 0.19, P = .005; pBH = 0.020). There was no evidence that the relationships between HF-HRV or SCR and risky decision-making differed between CBD and placebo conditions (drug × HF-HRV: P = .92; drug × SCR: P = .958; both pBH = .958).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>CBD increased HF-HRV but did not significantly alter SCR, risky decision-making, or the relationship between autonomic responses and risky decision-making. These findings suggest that CBD influences autonomic responding during task performance, although the functional significance of this effect remains uncertain. The modest sample size and relatively healthy, non-treatment-seeking sample may have limited the ability to detect broader physiological and behavioural effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7407,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and alcoholism","volume":"61 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13665463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agag068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To examine the effects of cannabidiol (CBD) on psychophysiological responding and risky decision-making in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD).

Methods: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial, 18 participants with AUD completed the Columbia Card Task (CCT) following administration of CBD and placebo. Skin conductance responses (SCR) and high-frequency heart rate variability (HF-HRV) were assessed as indices of autonomic responding during task performance. Risk-taking was indexed by the number of cards selected on the CCT.

Results: CBD did not significantly affect SCR (P = .16, pBH = .326) or risky decision-making on the CCT (P > .63, pBH = 0.67). However, CBD significantly increased HF-HRV (β = 0.53, SE = 0.19, P = .005; pBH = 0.020). There was no evidence that the relationships between HF-HRV or SCR and risky decision-making differed between CBD and placebo conditions (drug × HF-HRV: P = .92; drug × SCR: P = .958; both pBH = .958).

Discussion: CBD increased HF-HRV but did not significantly alter SCR, risky decision-making, or the relationship between autonomic responses and risky decision-making. These findings suggest that CBD influences autonomic responding during task performance, although the functional significance of this effect remains uncertain. The modest sample size and relatively healthy, non-treatment-seeking sample may have limited the ability to detect broader physiological and behavioural effects.

大麻二酚对酒精使用障碍患者风险决策和自主神经功能的影响
目的:探讨大麻二酚(CBD)对酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者心理生理反应和风险决策的影响。方法:在一项双盲、安慰剂对照的交叉试验中,18名AUD患者在给予CBD和安慰剂后完成了哥伦比亚卡片任务(CCT)。皮肤电导反应(SCR)和高频心率变异性(HF-HRV)作为任务执行过程中自主反应的指标进行评估。风险是由CCT上选择的卡片数量索引的。结果:CBD对SCR无显著影响(P =。16、pBH =。326)或CCT上的风险决策(P bb0)。63, pBH = 0.67)。然而,CBD显著增加HF-HRV (β = 0.53, SE = 0.19, P = 0.005; pBH = 0.020)。没有证据表明,在CBD和安慰剂条件下,HF-HRV或SCR与风险决策之间的关系存在差异(药物× HF-HRV: P = 0.92;药物× SCR: P = 0.958; pBH均= 0.958)。讨论:CBD增加了HF-HRV,但没有显著改变SCR、风险决策或自主反应与风险决策之间的关系。这些发现表明,CBD影响任务执行中的自主反应,尽管这种影响的功能意义尚不确定。适度的样本量和相对健康、不寻求治疗的样本量可能限制了检测更广泛的生理和行为影响的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alcohol and alcoholism
Alcohol and alcoholism 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Alcohol and Alcoholism publishes papers on the biomedical, psychological, and sociological aspects of alcoholism and alcohol research, provided that they make a new and significant contribution to knowledge in the field. Papers include new results obtained experimentally, descriptions of new experimental (including clinical) methods of importance to the field of alcohol research and treatment, or new interpretations of existing results. Theoretical contributions are considered equally with papers dealing with experimental work provided that such theoretical contributions are not of a largely speculative or philosophical nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书