Species-specific inflammatory responses of chondrocytes: Toward evidence-based model selection in OA research.

IF 4.5 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
iScience Pub Date : 2026-09-22 eCollection Date: 2026-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2026.117710
Angkana Kidtiwong, Maria-Belen Arteaga, Karyna Tarasova, Sinan Gültekin, Mario Rothbauer, Iris Gerner, Florien Jenner
{"title":"Species-specific inflammatory responses of chondrocytes: Toward evidence-based model selection in OA research.","authors":"Angkana Kidtiwong, Maria-Belen Arteaga, Karyna Tarasova, Sinan Gültekin, Mario Rothbauer, Iris Gerner, Florien Jenner","doi":"10.1016/j.isci.2026.117710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To inform evidence-based osteoarthritis model selection, this study compares inflammatory responses of articular chondrocytes from six species (human, horse, sheep, rabbit, rat, and mouse) under standardized IL-1β and TNF-α stimulation in 2D and 3D culture. Chondrocytes were assessed for viability, proliferation, wound healing, and transcriptomic changes via RT-qPCR and 3'RNA sequencing. Marked interspecies differences were observed in morphology, proliferation, and inflammatory gene activation, with only two genes (<i>SOD2</i>, <i>NFKBIA</i>) conserved across all species. Human, horse, and rat chondrocytes shared pathways including acute phase response, deubiquitination, and class-A/1-GPCR signaling. Species-specific responses included matrix remodeling in horses, rheumatoid arthritis-related pathways in sheep, and mixed inflammatory-regenerative profiles in rats. While no species fully replicates human OA, equine and rat chondrocytes best reflect key aspects of human inflammation. These findings underscore the need for molecular criteria in model selection and advocate for human cell-based models when interspecies differences limit the translational value of animal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":342,"journal":{"name":"iScience","volume":"29 10","pages":"117710"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13657218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iScience","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117710","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To inform evidence-based osteoarthritis model selection, this study compares inflammatory responses of articular chondrocytes from six species (human, horse, sheep, rabbit, rat, and mouse) under standardized IL-1β and TNF-α stimulation in 2D and 3D culture. Chondrocytes were assessed for viability, proliferation, wound healing, and transcriptomic changes via RT-qPCR and 3'RNA sequencing. Marked interspecies differences were observed in morphology, proliferation, and inflammatory gene activation, with only two genes (SOD2, NFKBIA) conserved across all species. Human, horse, and rat chondrocytes shared pathways including acute phase response, deubiquitination, and class-A/1-GPCR signaling. Species-specific responses included matrix remodeling in horses, rheumatoid arthritis-related pathways in sheep, and mixed inflammatory-regenerative profiles in rats. While no species fully replicates human OA, equine and rat chondrocytes best reflect key aspects of human inflammation. These findings underscore the need for molecular criteria in model selection and advocate for human cell-based models when interspecies differences limit the translational value of animal models.

软骨细胞的物种特异性炎症反应:OA研究中基于证据的模型选择。
为了为骨关节炎模型的选择提供依据,本研究比较了六种动物(人、马、羊、兔、大鼠和小鼠)在标准化IL-1β和TNF-α刺激下的关节软骨细胞在2D和3D培养中的炎症反应。通过RT-qPCR和3'RNA测序评估软骨细胞的活力、增殖、伤口愈合和转录组学变化。物种间在形态、增殖和炎症基因激活方面存在显著差异,所有物种中只有两个基因(SOD2和NFKBIA)保守。人、马和大鼠软骨细胞共享急性期反应、去泛素化和a类/1-GPCR信号通路。物种特异性反应包括马的基质重塑,羊的类风湿关节炎相关通路,以及大鼠的混合炎症再生谱。虽然没有物种完全复制人类OA,但马和大鼠的软骨细胞最能反映人类炎症的关键方面。这些发现强调了分子标准在模型选择中的必要性,并在种间差异限制动物模型的翻译价值时提倡基于人类细胞的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
iScience
iScience Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1972
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Science has many big remaining questions. To address them, we will need to work collaboratively and across disciplines. The goal of iScience is to help fuel that type of interdisciplinary thinking. iScience is a new open-access journal from Cell Press that provides a platform for original research in the life, physical, and earth sciences. The primary criterion for publication in iScience is a significant contribution to a relevant field combined with robust results and underlying methodology. The advances appearing in iScience include both fundamental and applied investigations across this interdisciplinary range of topic areas. To support transparency in scientific investigation, we are happy to consider replication studies and papers that describe negative results. We know you want your work to be published quickly and to be widely visible within your community and beyond. With the strong international reputation of Cell Press behind it, publication in iScience will help your work garner the attention and recognition it merits. Like all Cell Press journals, iScience prioritizes rapid publication. Our editorial team pays special attention to high-quality author service and to efficient, clear-cut decisions based on the information available within the manuscript. iScience taps into the expertise across Cell Press journals and selected partners to inform our editorial decisions and help publish your science in a timely and seamless way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书