Angkana Kidtiwong, Maria-Belen Arteaga, Karyna Tarasova, Sinan Gültekin, Mario Rothbauer, Iris Gerner, Florien Jenner
{"title":"Species-specific inflammatory responses of chondrocytes: Toward evidence-based model selection in OA research.","authors":"Angkana Kidtiwong, Maria-Belen Arteaga, Karyna Tarasova, Sinan Gültekin, Mario Rothbauer, Iris Gerner, Florien Jenner","doi":"10.1016/j.isci.2026.117710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To inform evidence-based osteoarthritis model selection, this study compares inflammatory responses of articular chondrocytes from six species (human, horse, sheep, rabbit, rat, and mouse) under standardized IL-1β and TNF-α stimulation in 2D and 3D culture. Chondrocytes were assessed for viability, proliferation, wound healing, and transcriptomic changes via RT-qPCR and 3'RNA sequencing. Marked interspecies differences were observed in morphology, proliferation, and inflammatory gene activation, with only two genes (<i>SOD2</i>, <i>NFKBIA</i>) conserved across all species. Human, horse, and rat chondrocytes shared pathways including acute phase response, deubiquitination, and class-A/1-GPCR signaling. Species-specific responses included matrix remodeling in horses, rheumatoid arthritis-related pathways in sheep, and mixed inflammatory-regenerative profiles in rats. While no species fully replicates human OA, equine and rat chondrocytes best reflect key aspects of human inflammation. These findings underscore the need for molecular criteria in model selection and advocate for human cell-based models when interspecies differences limit the translational value of animal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":342,"journal":{"name":"iScience","volume":"29 10","pages":"117710"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13657218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iScience","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.117710","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To inform evidence-based osteoarthritis model selection, this study compares inflammatory responses of articular chondrocytes from six species (human, horse, sheep, rabbit, rat, and mouse) under standardized IL-1β and TNF-α stimulation in 2D and 3D culture. Chondrocytes were assessed for viability, proliferation, wound healing, and transcriptomic changes via RT-qPCR and 3'RNA sequencing. Marked interspecies differences were observed in morphology, proliferation, and inflammatory gene activation, with only two genes (SOD2, NFKBIA) conserved across all species. Human, horse, and rat chondrocytes shared pathways including acute phase response, deubiquitination, and class-A/1-GPCR signaling. Species-specific responses included matrix remodeling in horses, rheumatoid arthritis-related pathways in sheep, and mixed inflammatory-regenerative profiles in rats. While no species fully replicates human OA, equine and rat chondrocytes best reflect key aspects of human inflammation. These findings underscore the need for molecular criteria in model selection and advocate for human cell-based models when interspecies differences limit the translational value of animal models.
期刊介绍:
Science has many big remaining questions. To address them, we will need to work collaboratively and across disciplines. The goal of iScience is to help fuel that type of interdisciplinary thinking. iScience is a new open-access journal from Cell Press that provides a platform for original research in the life, physical, and earth sciences. The primary criterion for publication in iScience is a significant contribution to a relevant field combined with robust results and underlying methodology. The advances appearing in iScience include both fundamental and applied investigations across this interdisciplinary range of topic areas. To support transparency in scientific investigation, we are happy to consider replication studies and papers that describe negative results.
We know you want your work to be published quickly and to be widely visible within your community and beyond. With the strong international reputation of Cell Press behind it, publication in iScience will help your work garner the attention and recognition it merits. Like all Cell Press journals, iScience prioritizes rapid publication. Our editorial team pays special attention to high-quality author service and to efficient, clear-cut decisions based on the information available within the manuscript. iScience taps into the expertise across Cell Press journals and selected partners to inform our editorial decisions and help publish your science in a timely and seamless way.