Variable proficiency attainment following virtual reality cataract training: Implications for a mastery learning approach.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Amalie Carlsson, Lars Konge, Morten la Cour, Anton Quoc Dung Le, Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen
{"title":"Variable proficiency attainment following virtual reality cataract training: Implications for a mastery learning approach.","authors":"Amalie Carlsson, Lars Konge, Morten la Cour, Anton Quoc Dung Le, Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen","doi":"10.1111/aos.70254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Virtual reality simulation (VRS)-based training is widely used to prepare novice cataract surgeons, yet unstandardized training regimens result in variable competence at the transition to surgery. In many settings, training follows a directed self-regulated learning approach, where progression is based on self-assessed competence. In contrast, mastery learning requires trainees to reach a predefined proficiency benchmark. This study evaluated whether participants using directed self-regulated learning attained proficiency on a simulation-based test with established validity evidence, whether baseline aptitude predicted proficiency attainment, and the time required to reach the benchmark.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included ophthalmology residents and research associates at the Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, with ≥6 months of clinical ophthalmology experience. Participants completed a baseline test on the EyeSi Surgical Simulator and trained until they felt ready to attempt a simulation-based test. Passing required reaching a predefined proficiency benchmark. Participants who did not reach the benchmark repeated testing until proficiency attainment or training was discontinued.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty participants were included; 25 (63%) reached the proficiency benchmark. Baseline score was not significantly associated with proficiency attainment (OR per 1 SD = 1.60, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.32; p = 0.18). Median time to proficiency was 13 h 21 min (range, 6 h 57 min-31 h 37 min).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Directed self-regulated learning did not ensure proficiency attainment among all participants. No statistically significant association was found between baseline score and proficiency attainment, and variation in training time supports the rationale for evaluation and implementation of a mastery learning approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.70254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Virtual reality simulation (VRS)-based training is widely used to prepare novice cataract surgeons, yet unstandardized training regimens result in variable competence at the transition to surgery. In many settings, training follows a directed self-regulated learning approach, where progression is based on self-assessed competence. In contrast, mastery learning requires trainees to reach a predefined proficiency benchmark. This study evaluated whether participants using directed self-regulated learning attained proficiency on a simulation-based test with established validity evidence, whether baseline aptitude predicted proficiency attainment, and the time required to reach the benchmark.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included ophthalmology residents and research associates at the Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, with ≥6 months of clinical ophthalmology experience. Participants completed a baseline test on the EyeSi Surgical Simulator and trained until they felt ready to attempt a simulation-based test. Passing required reaching a predefined proficiency benchmark. Participants who did not reach the benchmark repeated testing until proficiency attainment or training was discontinued.

Results: Forty participants were included; 25 (63%) reached the proficiency benchmark. Baseline score was not significantly associated with proficiency attainment (OR per 1 SD = 1.60, 95% CI 0.82 to 3.32; p = 0.18). Median time to proficiency was 13 h 21 min (range, 6 h 57 min-31 h 37 min).

Conclusion: Directed self-regulated learning did not ensure proficiency attainment among all participants. No statistically significant association was found between baseline score and proficiency attainment, and variation in training time supports the rationale for evaluation and implementation of a mastery learning approach.

虚拟现实白内障训练后的不同熟练程度:掌握学习方法的意义。
目的:基于虚拟现实仿真(VRS)的培训被广泛应用于白内障外科新手的培训,但不规范的培训方案导致他们在手术过渡阶段的能力差异。在许多情况下,培训遵循有指导的自我调节的学习方法,其中进展是基于自我评估的能力。相比之下,掌握学习要求受训者达到预先设定的熟练程度基准。本研究评估了使用定向自我调节学习的参与者是否在基于模拟的测试中获得了具有既定有效性证据的熟练程度,基线能力是否预测了熟练程度的达到,以及达到基准所需的时间。方法:前瞻性队列研究纳入Rigshospitalet-Glostrup眼科住院医师和具有6个月以上眼科临床经验的研究人员。参与者在EyeSi手术模拟器上完成了基线测试,并进行了培训,直到他们准备好尝试基于模拟的测试。通过要求达到预定义的熟练程度基准。未达到基准的参与者重复测试,直到达到熟练程度或培训停止。结果:共纳入40例受试者;25人(63%)达到熟练基准。基线评分与熟练程度无显著相关性(OR / 1 SD = 1.60, 95% CI 0.82至3.32;p = 0.18)。达到熟练的中位时间为13小时21分钟(范围为6小时57分钟-31小时37分钟)。结论:定向自我调节学习并不能保证所有参与者达到熟练程度。基线分数与熟练程度之间没有统计学上的显著关联,培训时间的变化支持了评估和实施掌握学习方法的基本原理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书