Prevalence and Treatment Gap of Epilepsy in Rural Ludhiana: A Community-Based Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-09 DOI:10.4103/aian.aian_1305_25
Aman Bansal, Anurag Chaudhary, Sangeeta Girdhar, Gagandeep Singh, Pranjl Sharma, Ashwani K Chaudhary
{"title":"Prevalence and Treatment Gap of Epilepsy in Rural Ludhiana: A Community-Based Study.","authors":"Aman Bansal, Anurag Chaudhary, Sangeeta Girdhar, Gagandeep Singh, Pranjl Sharma, Ashwani K Chaudhary","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_1305_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Epilepsy, a significant neurological disorder prevalent globally, poses considerable challenges in India due to lifestyle changes, increased life expectancy, and varied healthcare access. Its prevalence in India contributes to 20% of the global burden, with notable treatment gaps and stigmatization affecting patients' quality of life and economic stability. This study aims to assess the prevalence of epilepsy and determinants of treatment gaps in rural Ludhiana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This community-based cross-sectional study, conducted in rural Ludhiana, Punjab, involved door-to-door screening of 31,043 individuals using the Placencia 9-item questionnaire. The entire population of the field practice area was screened using a census approach. Data on sociodemographic profile, seizure history, treatment gap, clinical and treatment-related factors, and medical history were included. Institutional ethics approval and informed consent from participants were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 31,043 individuals screened, 195 were identified as screen positive for epilepsy, and 61 (32.6%) had active epilepsy. The lifetime prevalence of epilepsy was 2.5 per 1,000 individuals, and the prevalence of active epilepsy was 1.96 per 1,000 individuals. A bimodal age distribution of epilepsy was noted, with the highest lifetime prevalence among people aged ≥80 years. A significant treatment gap was observed, with 49.2% of individuals with active epilepsy not receiving appropriate treatment, influenced by factors such as age, gender, education, marital status, and socioeconomic status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the significant prevalence and treatment gap of epilepsy in rural Ludhiana, highlighting the need for improved awareness, targeted healthcare strategies, and rehabilitation efforts. Strengthening counseling services at the primary healthcare level may substantially improve treatment adherence. A multifaceted approach is required considering socioeconomic, educational, and cultural factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"803-809"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_1305_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Epilepsy, a significant neurological disorder prevalent globally, poses considerable challenges in India due to lifestyle changes, increased life expectancy, and varied healthcare access. Its prevalence in India contributes to 20% of the global burden, with notable treatment gaps and stigmatization affecting patients' quality of life and economic stability. This study aims to assess the prevalence of epilepsy and determinants of treatment gaps in rural Ludhiana.

Methods: This community-based cross-sectional study, conducted in rural Ludhiana, Punjab, involved door-to-door screening of 31,043 individuals using the Placencia 9-item questionnaire. The entire population of the field practice area was screened using a census approach. Data on sociodemographic profile, seizure history, treatment gap, clinical and treatment-related factors, and medical history were included. Institutional ethics approval and informed consent from participants were obtained.

Results: Of the 31,043 individuals screened, 195 were identified as screen positive for epilepsy, and 61 (32.6%) had active epilepsy. The lifetime prevalence of epilepsy was 2.5 per 1,000 individuals, and the prevalence of active epilepsy was 1.96 per 1,000 individuals. A bimodal age distribution of epilepsy was noted, with the highest lifetime prevalence among people aged ≥80 years. A significant treatment gap was observed, with 49.2% of individuals with active epilepsy not receiving appropriate treatment, influenced by factors such as age, gender, education, marital status, and socioeconomic status.

Conclusions: The study underscores the significant prevalence and treatment gap of epilepsy in rural Ludhiana, highlighting the need for improved awareness, targeted healthcare strategies, and rehabilitation efforts. Strengthening counseling services at the primary healthcare level may substantially improve treatment adherence. A multifaceted approach is required considering socioeconomic, educational, and cultural factors.

卢迪亚纳农村癫痫患病率及治疗差距:一项社区研究。
背景和目的:癫痫是一种全球普遍存在的重大神经系统疾病,由于生活方式的改变、预期寿命的延长和不同的医疗保健机会,在印度构成了相当大的挑战。它在印度的流行占全球负担的20%,显著的治疗差距和污名化影响了患者的生活质量和经济稳定。本研究旨在评估卢迪亚纳农村癫痫的患病率和治疗差距的决定因素。方法:这项以社区为基础的横断面研究在旁遮普的卢迪亚纳农村进行,使用Placencia 9项问卷对31,043人进行了挨家挨户的筛查。使用人口普查方法对现场实践区域的全部人口进行了筛选。包括社会人口统计资料、癫痫发作史、治疗间隔、临床和治疗相关因素以及病史。获得了参与者的机构伦理批准和知情同意。结果:在筛查的31,043人中,195人被确定为癫痫筛查阳性,61人(32.6%)患有活动性癫痫。终生癫痫患病率为每1000人2.5例,活动性癫痫患病率为每1000人1.96例。癫痫的年龄分布呈双峰分布,≥80岁人群的终生患病率最高。受年龄、性别、教育程度、婚姻状况和社会经济状况等因素的影响,有49.2%的活动性癫痫患者没有得到适当的治疗。结论:该研究强调了卢迪亚纳农村癫痫的显著患病率和治疗差距,强调了提高认识、有针对性的卫生保健策略和康复工作的必要性。加强初级保健一级的咨询服务可大大提高治疗依从性。考虑到社会经济、教育和文化因素,需要采取多方面的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Nervous System Diseases-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
293
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书