Phase-specific alpha tACS over the dlPFC does not enhance cognitive reappraisal or autonomic responses: A sham-controlled crossover study.

IF 4.3 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
AIMS Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-08-26 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3934/Neuroscience.2026022
Catarina Gomes Coelho, Jorge Leite, Gabriela Gonzaga, Paulo Machado, Sandra Carvalho
{"title":"Phase-specific alpha tACS over the dlPFC does not enhance cognitive reappraisal or autonomic responses: A sham-controlled crossover study.","authors":"Catarina Gomes Coelho, Jorge Leite, Gabriela Gonzaga, Paulo Machado, Sandra Carvalho","doi":"10.3934/Neuroscience.2026022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive reappraisal (CR) relies on prefrontal top-down control over limbic systems, with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) playing a central regulatory role. Alpha-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (α-tACS) can modulate cortical oscillations; yet, its causal contribution to emotion regulation (ER) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we investigated whether in-phase or anti-phase alpha-tACS influenced subjective and physiological responses during cognitive reappraisal of negative emotional stimuli.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two healthy young adults completed three counterbalanced sessions (in-phase, anti-phase, sham) in a single-blind, sham-controlled crossover design. During α-tACS or sham, participants applied three CR strategies (positive, fictional, distancing) while viewing negative and neutral film clips. Valence, arousal, heart rate (HR), skin conductance (SC), respiratory rate (RR), and pre/post-session affect (PANAS) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Emotional Movie Database (EMDB) emotional stimuli elicited the expected subjective and autonomic responses, confirming that the task engaged emotional-reactivity processes. Participants also showed a typical habituation pattern in physiological measures across blocks. However, neither in-phase nor anti-phase alpha-tACS was associated with measurable changes in subjective emotional ratings or autonomic responses relative to sham under the experimental conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides the first evaluation of phase-specific alpha-tACS during cognitive reappraisal using film-based stimuli. Under the experimental conditions, no measurable effects of in-phase or anti-phase stimulation on subjective or autonomic measures of ER were observed. Future studies incorporating individualized stimulation frequencies, multi-session protocols, closed-loop stimulation, and concurrent electrophysiological recordings may help clarify the conditions under which phase-specific tACS influences ER.</p>","PeriodicalId":7732,"journal":{"name":"AIMS Neuroscience","volume":"13 3","pages":"483-509"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIMS Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2026022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive reappraisal (CR) relies on prefrontal top-down control over limbic systems, with the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) playing a central regulatory role. Alpha-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (α-tACS) can modulate cortical oscillations; yet, its causal contribution to emotion regulation (ER) remains unclear.

Objective: In this study, we investigated whether in-phase or anti-phase alpha-tACS influenced subjective and physiological responses during cognitive reappraisal of negative emotional stimuli.

Methods: Forty-two healthy young adults completed three counterbalanced sessions (in-phase, anti-phase, sham) in a single-blind, sham-controlled crossover design. During α-tACS or sham, participants applied three CR strategies (positive, fictional, distancing) while viewing negative and neutral film clips. Valence, arousal, heart rate (HR), skin conductance (SC), respiratory rate (RR), and pre/post-session affect (PANAS) were recorded.

Results: The Emotional Movie Database (EMDB) emotional stimuli elicited the expected subjective and autonomic responses, confirming that the task engaged emotional-reactivity processes. Participants also showed a typical habituation pattern in physiological measures across blocks. However, neither in-phase nor anti-phase alpha-tACS was associated with measurable changes in subjective emotional ratings or autonomic responses relative to sham under the experimental conditions.

Conclusion: This study provides the first evaluation of phase-specific alpha-tACS during cognitive reappraisal using film-based stimuli. Under the experimental conditions, no measurable effects of in-phase or anti-phase stimulation on subjective or autonomic measures of ER were observed. Future studies incorporating individualized stimulation frequencies, multi-session protocols, closed-loop stimulation, and concurrent electrophysiological recordings may help clarify the conditions under which phase-specific tACS influences ER.

一项假对照交叉研究表明,dlPFC上的阶段性α - tACS不会增强认知重评价或自主神经反应。
背景:认知重评价(CR)依赖于前额叶自上而下对边缘系统的控制,背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)起着核心的调节作用。α频经颅交流电刺激(α-tACS)可调节皮层振荡;然而,它对情绪调节(ER)的因果关系仍不清楚。目的:在本研究中,我们探讨了在负性情绪刺激的认知重评过程中,同相或反相α - tacs是否会影响主观和生理反应。方法:42名健康的年轻人在单盲、假对照交叉设计中完成了三个平衡实验(同阶段、反阶段、假)。在α-tACS或假期间,参与者在观看消极和中性的电影片段时采用了三种CR策略(积极、虚构、疏远)。记录价、觉醒、心率(HR)、皮肤电导(SC)、呼吸频率(RR)和治疗前/治疗后影响(PANAS)。结果:情绪电影数据库(EMDB)情绪刺激诱发了预期的主观反应和自主反应,证实了任务参与了情绪反应过程。参与者在跨街区的生理测量中也表现出典型的习惯模式。然而,在实验条件下,与假手术相比,同期和反期α - tacs都没有与主观情绪评分或自主反应的可测量变化相关。结论:本研究首次提供了基于电影刺激的认知重评中阶段性α - tacs的评估。在实验条件下,未观察到同相或反相刺激对内质网主观或自主测量的可测量影响。未来的研究包括个体化刺激频率、多会话方案、闭环刺激和并发电生理记录,可能有助于阐明特定阶段的tACS影响ER的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AIMS Neuroscience
AIMS Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: AIMS Neuroscience is an international Open Access journal devoted to publishing peer-reviewed, high quality, original papers from all areas in the field of neuroscience. The primary focus is to provide a forum in which to expedite the speed with which theoretical neuroscience progresses toward generating testable hypotheses. In the presence of current and developing technology that offers unprecedented access to functions of the nervous system at all levels, the journal is designed to serve the role of providing the widest variety of the best theoretical views leading to suggested studies. Single blind peer review is provided for all articles and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书