Donor-aware integrative single-cell analysis distinguishes consistent memory B-cell programmes from donor-sensitive state boundaries in untreated rheumatoid arthritis

IF 4 4区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Cui Zhang, Huaping Xin, Qin Wen, Caige Li, Guitang Chen, Bihong Zhu
{"title":"Donor-aware integrative single-cell analysis distinguishes consistent memory B-cell programmes from donor-sensitive state boundaries in untreated rheumatoid arthritis","authors":"Cui Zhang,&nbsp;Huaping Xin,&nbsp;Qin Wen,&nbsp;Caige Li,&nbsp;Guitang Chen,&nbsp;Bihong Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s10142-026-02071-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Single-cell transcriptomics resolves immune-cell heterogeneity, but whether cluster boundaries or coordinated programmes are the more transferable unit across donors remains uncertain. We reanalyzed 14,414 circulating memory B cells from four untreated rheumatoid arthritis donors. Harmony increased mean local donor entropy from 0.506 to 0.912, while original labels showed only moderate agreement with uncorrected and Harmony reclustering (adjusted Rand indices 0.508 and 0.473). Conditional label permutations and analyses based on pan-B-centred residuals or state-marker genes supported donor-level consistency for most major states, but identified C3-PECAM1 and the rare C10-IFN state as weakly specific or quality-control-sensitive. In training-only donor-held-out transfer, accuracy was 66.0–70.5% and adjusted Rand index was 0.432–0.525, indicating partial transfer rather than independent state recovery. Removal of DoubletFinder-predicted doublets preserved 15–20 of each state’s top 20 pseudobulk markers and did not change programme rank order across states. Rank-based UCell scores agreed with AddModuleScore in both datasets. In an independent cohort of 5,725 memory B cells from 34 donors, adapted programme scores could be quantified, but no disease-activity or serological association remained significant after correction; treatment and unavailable disease-duration data limited clinical interpretation. These results distinguish recurrent donor-level transcriptional structure from analysis-sensitive state boundaries and support programme-level interpretation without claiming independent cell-state validation or biomarker utility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":574,"journal":{"name":"Functional & Integrative Genomics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functional & Integrative Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10142-026-02071-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single-cell transcriptomics resolves immune-cell heterogeneity, but whether cluster boundaries or coordinated programmes are the more transferable unit across donors remains uncertain. We reanalyzed 14,414 circulating memory B cells from four untreated rheumatoid arthritis donors. Harmony increased mean local donor entropy from 0.506 to 0.912, while original labels showed only moderate agreement with uncorrected and Harmony reclustering (adjusted Rand indices 0.508 and 0.473). Conditional label permutations and analyses based on pan-B-centred residuals or state-marker genes supported donor-level consistency for most major states, but identified C3-PECAM1 and the rare C10-IFN state as weakly specific or quality-control-sensitive. In training-only donor-held-out transfer, accuracy was 66.0–70.5% and adjusted Rand index was 0.432–0.525, indicating partial transfer rather than independent state recovery. Removal of DoubletFinder-predicted doublets preserved 15–20 of each state’s top 20 pseudobulk markers and did not change programme rank order across states. Rank-based UCell scores agreed with AddModuleScore in both datasets. In an independent cohort of 5,725 memory B cells from 34 donors, adapted programme scores could be quantified, but no disease-activity or serological association remained significant after correction; treatment and unavailable disease-duration data limited clinical interpretation. These results distinguish recurrent donor-level transcriptional structure from analysis-sensitive state boundaries and support programme-level interpretation without claiming independent cell-state validation or biomarker utility.

在未经治疗的类风湿关节炎中,供体感知的综合单细胞分析将一致记忆b细胞程序与供体敏感状态边界区分开来。
单细胞转录组学解决了免疫细胞的异质性,但集群边界或协调规划是否在供体之间更具可转移性仍然不确定。我们重新分析了来自四名未经治疗的类风湿关节炎供者的14414个循环记忆B细胞。Harmony将平均局部供体熵从0.506增加到0.912,而原始标签与未校正和Harmony重新聚类的一致性仅为中等(调整后的Rand指数为0.508和0.473)。基于泛b中心残差或状态标记基因的条件标签排列和分析支持大多数主要状态的供体水平一致性,但确定C3-PECAM1和罕见的C10-IFN状态为弱特异性或质量控制敏感。在仅培训的供者持有转移中,准确率为60.0 -70.5%,调整后的Rand指数为0.432-0.525,表明转移是部分转移,而不是独立状态恢复。删除doubletfinder预测的双重标记保留了每个州前20个伪散装标记中的15-20个,并且没有改变各州的程序排名顺序。基于排名的UCell分数在两个数据集中都与AddModuleScore一致。在来自34个供体的5,725个记忆B细胞的独立队列中,适应方案评分可以量化,但校正后没有疾病活动性或血清学关联仍然显着;治疗和无法获得的病程数据限制了临床解释。这些结果将复发供体水平的转录结构与分析敏感的状态边界区分开来,并支持项目水平的解释,而不要求独立的细胞状态验证或生物标志物效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
92
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Functional & Integrative Genomics is devoted to large-scale studies of genomes and their functions, including systems analyses of biological processes. The journal will provide the research community an integrated platform where researchers can share, review and discuss their findings on important biological questions that will ultimately enable us to answer the fundamental question: How do genomes work?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书