Initial treatment strategies and outcomes across haemodynamic thresholds and risk stratification in incident systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: a EUSTAR analysis.
Hilde Jenssen Bjørkekjær, Cosimo Bruni, Kaspar Broch, Cathrine Brunborg, Patricia E Carreira, Paolo Airò, Carmen Pilar Simeón-Aznar, Marie-Elise Truchetet, Alessandro Giollo, Alexandra Balbir-Gurman, Mickael Martin, Christopher P Denton, Armando Gabrielli, Francesco Del Galdo, Madelon C Vonk, Håvard Fretheim, Helle Bitter, Øyvind Midtvedt, Arne K Andreassen, Sverre Høie, Yoshiya Tanaka, Gabriela Riemekasten, Ulf Müller-Ladner, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Ivan Castellví, Elise Siegert, Eric Hachulla, Øyvind Molberg, Oliver Distler, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold
{"title":"Initial treatment strategies and outcomes across haemodynamic thresholds and risk stratification in incident systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: a EUSTAR analysis.","authors":"Hilde Jenssen Bjørkekjær, Cosimo Bruni, Kaspar Broch, Cathrine Brunborg, Patricia E Carreira, Paolo Airò, Carmen Pilar Simeón-Aznar, Marie-Elise Truchetet, Alessandro Giollo, Alexandra Balbir-Gurman, Mickael Martin, Christopher P Denton, Armando Gabrielli, Francesco Del Galdo, Madelon C Vonk, Håvard Fretheim, Helle Bitter, Øyvind Midtvedt, Arne K Andreassen, Sverre Høie, Yoshiya Tanaka, Gabriela Riemekasten, Ulf Müller-Ladner, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Ivan Castellví, Elise Siegert, Eric Hachulla, Øyvind Molberg, Oliver Distler, Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold","doi":"10.1002/art.70372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Real-world initial treatment strategies in SSc-PAH remain incompletely described. We aimed to characterise these strategies across haemodynamic thresholds and risk strata and evaluate outcome associations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed treatment-naïve SSc-PAH patients in EUSTAR (2000-2021) fulfilling the 2022 haemodynamic definition. Initial therapy comprised treatment initiated within 4 months of RHC. As-treated (AT) analyses were primary and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses supportive. Outcomes were all-cause mortality and 36-month PAH progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 301 patients, 198 (66%) initiated therapy and 170 maintained therapy for ≥3 months. Therapy was initiated in 31% with milder haemodynamic impairment (mPAP 21-24 mmHg and/or PVR 2-3 WU) versus 79% fulfilling the previous haemodynamic definition; combination therapy increased from 14% to 67% across low- to high-risk strata. Over a median 3.9 years, 125 (42%) died and 85/227 (37%) progressed. Adjusted ITT analyses showed no association with either outcome, whereas adjusted AT analyses showed lower mortality risk with sustained monotherapy and combination therapy (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.92 and HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.88, respectively) and lower PAH progression risk with sustained initial therapy (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.76). In the milder haemodynamic subgroup, the mortality estimate was directionally consistent but imprecise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initial treatment strategies reflected haemodynamic severity and baseline risk, while variation suggested potential implementation gaps. Sustained initial therapy was associated with lower risks of mortality and PAH progression. Contrasting ITT and AT estimates highlight challenges in observational treatment-outcome comparisons. Findings in the milder haemodynamic subgroup support dedicated prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.70372","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Real-world initial treatment strategies in SSc-PAH remain incompletely described. We aimed to characterise these strategies across haemodynamic thresholds and risk strata and evaluate outcome associations.
Methods: We analysed treatment-naïve SSc-PAH patients in EUSTAR (2000-2021) fulfilling the 2022 haemodynamic definition. Initial therapy comprised treatment initiated within 4 months of RHC. As-treated (AT) analyses were primary and intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses supportive. Outcomes were all-cause mortality and 36-month PAH progression.
Results: Among 301 patients, 198 (66%) initiated therapy and 170 maintained therapy for ≥3 months. Therapy was initiated in 31% with milder haemodynamic impairment (mPAP 21-24 mmHg and/or PVR 2-3 WU) versus 79% fulfilling the previous haemodynamic definition; combination therapy increased from 14% to 67% across low- to high-risk strata. Over a median 3.9 years, 125 (42%) died and 85/227 (37%) progressed. Adjusted ITT analyses showed no association with either outcome, whereas adjusted AT analyses showed lower mortality risk with sustained monotherapy and combination therapy (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.27-0.92 and HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.88, respectively) and lower PAH progression risk with sustained initial therapy (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18-0.76). In the milder haemodynamic subgroup, the mortality estimate was directionally consistent but imprecise.
Conclusion: Initial treatment strategies reflected haemodynamic severity and baseline risk, while variation suggested potential implementation gaps. Sustained initial therapy was associated with lower risks of mortality and PAH progression. Contrasting ITT and AT estimates highlight challenges in observational treatment-outcome comparisons. Findings in the milder haemodynamic subgroup support dedicated prospective studies.
期刊介绍:
Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.