{"title":"Elk in Medieval Towns of Rus': Meat, Hides, and Antler Economies","authors":"A. V. Zinoviev","doi":"10.1002/oa.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Elk (<i>Alces alces</i>) was the largest wild ungulate available to the forest-zone towns of medieval Rus', yet it rarely forms more than a trace component of urban faunal assemblages. Here I synthesize published zooarchaeological evidence from key towns (Novgorod and Tver) and comparative datasets from other Rus' urban sites to reassess elk's economic role. In medieval Novgorod, elk remains typically constitute ~0.2% of identified mammal bones, but they are frequently modified: one-third of elk specimens bear butchery marks, and cranial elements show deliberate splitting and antler pedicle removal. Hinterland sites display complementary patterns, including strong biases toward foot bones and skinning marks, consistent with the import of hides rather than whole carcasses. Together, these signatures indicate that elk entered towns mainly through targeted product flows—antler for craft production and hides for processing—while contributing only marginally to routine urban meat supply. I argue that elk is best understood as an ‘invisible commodity’ of medieval urban economies: materially significant in craft and exchange networks but weakly represented in food waste deposits.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14179,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","volume":"36 5","pages":"1121-1129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.70158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Elk (Alces alces) was the largest wild ungulate available to the forest-zone towns of medieval Rus', yet it rarely forms more than a trace component of urban faunal assemblages. Here I synthesize published zooarchaeological evidence from key towns (Novgorod and Tver) and comparative datasets from other Rus' urban sites to reassess elk's economic role. In medieval Novgorod, elk remains typically constitute ~0.2% of identified mammal bones, but they are frequently modified: one-third of elk specimens bear butchery marks, and cranial elements show deliberate splitting and antler pedicle removal. Hinterland sites display complementary patterns, including strong biases toward foot bones and skinning marks, consistent with the import of hides rather than whole carcasses. Together, these signatures indicate that elk entered towns mainly through targeted product flows—antler for craft production and hides for processing—while contributing only marginally to routine urban meat supply. I argue that elk is best understood as an ‘invisible commodity’ of medieval urban economies: materially significant in craft and exchange networks but weakly represented in food waste deposits.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology is to provide a forum for the publication of papers dealing with all aspects of the study of human and animal bones from archaeological contexts. The journal will publish original papers dealing with human or animal bone research from any area of the world. It will also publish short papers which give important preliminary observations from work in progress and it will publish book reviews. All papers will be subject to peer review. The journal will be aimed principally towards all those with a professional interest in the study of human and animal bones. This includes archaeologists, anthropologists, human and animal bone specialists, palaeopathologists and medical historians.