Elk in Medieval Towns of Rus': Meat, Hides, and Antler Economies

IF 0.9 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology Pub Date : 2026-10-14 Epub Date: 2026-07-30 DOI:10.1002/oa.70158
A. V. Zinoviev
{"title":"Elk in Medieval Towns of Rus': Meat, Hides, and Antler Economies","authors":"A. V. Zinoviev","doi":"10.1002/oa.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Elk (<i>Alces alces</i>) was the largest wild ungulate available to the forest-zone towns of medieval Rus', yet it rarely forms more than a trace component of urban faunal assemblages. Here I synthesize published zooarchaeological evidence from key towns (Novgorod and Tver) and comparative datasets from other Rus' urban sites to reassess elk's economic role. In medieval Novgorod, elk remains typically constitute ~0.2% of identified mammal bones, but they are frequently modified: one-third of elk specimens bear butchery marks, and cranial elements show deliberate splitting and antler pedicle removal. Hinterland sites display complementary patterns, including strong biases toward foot bones and skinning marks, consistent with the import of hides rather than whole carcasses. Together, these signatures indicate that elk entered towns mainly through targeted product flows—antler for craft production and hides for processing—while contributing only marginally to routine urban meat supply. I argue that elk is best understood as an ‘invisible commodity’ of medieval urban economies: materially significant in craft and exchange networks but weakly represented in food waste deposits.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14179,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","volume":"36 5","pages":"1121-1129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.70158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elk (Alces alces) was the largest wild ungulate available to the forest-zone towns of medieval Rus', yet it rarely forms more than a trace component of urban faunal assemblages. Here I synthesize published zooarchaeological evidence from key towns (Novgorod and Tver) and comparative datasets from other Rus' urban sites to reassess elk's economic role. In medieval Novgorod, elk remains typically constitute ~0.2% of identified mammal bones, but they are frequently modified: one-third of elk specimens bear butchery marks, and cranial elements show deliberate splitting and antler pedicle removal. Hinterland sites display complementary patterns, including strong biases toward foot bones and skinning marks, consistent with the import of hides rather than whole carcasses. Together, these signatures indicate that elk entered towns mainly through targeted product flows—antler for craft production and hides for processing—while contributing only marginally to routine urban meat supply. I argue that elk is best understood as an ‘invisible commodity’ of medieval urban economies: materially significant in craft and exchange networks but weakly represented in food waste deposits.

罗斯中世纪城镇的麋鹿:肉、兽皮和鹿角经济
麋鹿(Alces Alces)是中世纪罗斯森林地带城镇中最大的野生有蹄类动物,但它很少形成城市动物群落的一个微量组成部分。在这里,我综合了来自主要城镇(诺夫哥罗德和特维尔)的已发表的动物考古证据,以及来自俄罗斯其他城市遗址的比较数据集,以重新评估麋鹿的经济作用。在中世纪的诺夫哥罗德,麋鹿遗骸通常占已识别哺乳动物骨骼的0.2%,但它们经常被修改:三分之一的麋鹿标本带有屠宰痕迹,头骨元素显示故意分裂和鹿角蒂被移除。内陆地区的遗址显示出互补的模式,包括对脚骨和皮肤痕迹的强烈偏爱,这与进口兽皮而不是整个尸体相一致。总之,这些特征表明,麋鹿进入城镇主要是通过有针对性的产品流动——用于工艺品生产的鹿角和用于加工的兽皮——而对城市日常肉类供应的贡献很小。我认为,最好将麋鹿理解为中世纪城市经济的“无形商品”:在工艺和交换网络中具有重要意义,但在食物垃圾沉积物中却没有多大代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: The aim of the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology is to provide a forum for the publication of papers dealing with all aspects of the study of human and animal bones from archaeological contexts. The journal will publish original papers dealing with human or animal bone research from any area of the world. It will also publish short papers which give important preliminary observations from work in progress and it will publish book reviews. All papers will be subject to peer review. The journal will be aimed principally towards all those with a professional interest in the study of human and animal bones. This includes archaeologists, anthropologists, human and animal bone specialists, palaeopathologists and medical historians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书