Demonstrating the Critical Role of Band-Edge Potential Alignment in Photocatalytic Cu(II) Reduction by ZnO and TiO2

IF 2.3 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
ChemistrySelect Pub Date : 2026-10-15 DOI:10.1002/slct.74853
Paramjit Singh, Sapana Jadoun, Minarul I. Sarkar, Chandra S. Bhatt, Eduardo Schott, Jorge Yáñez
{"title":"Demonstrating the Critical Role of Band-Edge Potential Alignment in Photocatalytic Cu(II) Reduction by ZnO and TiO2","authors":"Paramjit Singh,&nbsp;Sapana Jadoun,&nbsp;Minarul I. Sarkar,&nbsp;Chandra S. Bhatt,&nbsp;Eduardo Schott,&nbsp;Jorge Yáñez","doi":"10.1002/slct.74853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Photocatalytic reduction of Cu(II) offers a sustainable approach for recovery of metallic copper from aqueous solution under mild reaction conditions. However, the factors governing the thermodynamics feasibility of Cu(II) reduction remain insufficiently understood, and photocatalytic performance is frequently interpreted primarily in terms of semiconductor bandgap energy. Although zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO<sub>2</sub>) possess similar optical bandgaps (∼3.2 eV), they exhibit markedly different Cu(II) reduction behaviors. This discrepancy arises not from their optical bandgap, but from differences in their band-edge potentials, which control the thermodynamic feasibility of electron transfer between the photocatalyst and the media. For the Cu<sup>2</sup><sup>+</sup>/Cu<sup>0</sup> couple (+0.34 V vs. normal hydrogen electrode (NHE)), a photocatalyst must exhibit a conduction band minimum (CBM) more negative than the redox potential to achieve reduction. This manuscript theoretically and experimentally demonstrates that ZnO, with a CBM (−4.84 eV), effectively reduces Cu(II) to Cu(0), whereas TiO<sub>2</sub> (−4.48 eV), despite its comparable bandgap, showed predominantly adsorption with only limited evidence of Cu reduction under the investigated conditions. The results confirm that band-edge alignment, rather than bandgap energy alone, is the key predictive parameter for selecting suitable photocatalysts for redox reactions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":146,"journal":{"name":"ChemistrySelect","volume":"11 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemistrySelect","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/slct.74853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photocatalytic reduction of Cu(II) offers a sustainable approach for recovery of metallic copper from aqueous solution under mild reaction conditions. However, the factors governing the thermodynamics feasibility of Cu(II) reduction remain insufficiently understood, and photocatalytic performance is frequently interpreted primarily in terms of semiconductor bandgap energy. Although zinc oxide (ZnO) and titanium dioxide (TiO2) possess similar optical bandgaps (∼3.2 eV), they exhibit markedly different Cu(II) reduction behaviors. This discrepancy arises not from their optical bandgap, but from differences in their band-edge potentials, which control the thermodynamic feasibility of electron transfer between the photocatalyst and the media. For the Cu2+/Cu0 couple (+0.34 V vs. normal hydrogen electrode (NHE)), a photocatalyst must exhibit a conduction band minimum (CBM) more negative than the redox potential to achieve reduction. This manuscript theoretically and experimentally demonstrates that ZnO, with a CBM (−4.84 eV), effectively reduces Cu(II) to Cu(0), whereas TiO2 (−4.48 eV), despite its comparable bandgap, showed predominantly adsorption with only limited evidence of Cu reduction under the investigated conditions. The results confirm that band-edge alignment, rather than bandgap energy alone, is the key predictive parameter for selecting suitable photocatalysts for redox reactions.

ZnO和TiO2光催化还原Cu(II)过程中带边电位排列的关键作用
光催化还原Cu(II)为在温和反应条件下从水溶液中回收金属铜提供了一种可持续的方法。然而,控制Cu(II)还原热力学可行性的因素仍然没有得到充分的了解,光催化性能通常主要用半导体带隙能量来解释。虽然氧化锌(ZnO)和二氧化钛(TiO2)具有相似的光学带隙(~ 3.2 eV),但它们表现出明显不同的Cu(II)还原行为。这种差异不是来自它们的光学带隙,而是来自它们的带边电位的差异,这控制了光催化剂和介质之间电子转移的热力学可行性。对于Cu2+/Cu0对(+0.34 V vs普通氢电极(NHE)),光催化剂必须表现出比氧化还原电位更负的传导带最小值(CBM)才能实现还原。本文从理论和实验两方面证明,具有- 4.84 eV的CBM的ZnO可以有效地将Cu(II)还原为Cu(0),而TiO2 (- 4.48 eV)尽管具有类似的带隙,但在所研究的条件下,主要表现为吸附,只有有限的Cu还原证据。结果证实,带边对准,而不是单独的带隙能量,是选择适合氧化还原反应的光催化剂的关键预测参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ChemistrySelect
ChemistrySelect Chemistry-General Chemistry
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1809
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: ChemistrySelect is the latest journal from ChemPubSoc Europe and Wiley-VCH. It offers researchers a quality society-owned journal in which to publish their work in all areas of chemistry. Manuscripts are evaluated by active researchers to ensure they add meaningfully to the scientific literature, and those accepted are processed quickly to ensure rapid online publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书