The Burning Question: Frequencies of Tobacco Consumption in Postmedieval (16th–19th c. ce) England and the Netherlands

IF 0.9 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology Pub Date : 2026-10-14 Epub Date: 2026-08-07 DOI:10.1002/oa.70157
Anna M. Davies-Barrett, Sarah A. Inskip
{"title":"The Burning Question: Frequencies of Tobacco Consumption in Postmedieval (16th–19th c. ce) England and the Netherlands","authors":"Anna M. Davies-Barrett,&nbsp;Sarah A. Inskip","doi":"10.1002/oa.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The frequency of tobacco use during the postmedieval period is widely underexplored; this has repercussions for our understanding of the intoxicant's health impacts during this time. Our study assesses the frequency rates of tobacco consumption in different social groups in England and the Netherlands, two countries in which tobacco use became quickly incorporated into the sociocultural fabric after its introduction to Europe in the 16th century. We assessed frequencies of evidence for tobacco use in 380 English and 318 Dutch individuals, using osteoarchaeological and biomolecular analyses. We examined use-rates in individuals from three different socioeconomic backgrounds: rural agricultural (Barton-upon-Humber; Middenbeemster), urban high-middle (St James's Gardens Burial Ground; Zwolle), and urban low-middle (St James's Gardens Burial Ground; Arnhem) status. Our results indicate high usage rates in Dutch men (63.6%–98.1%), who overwhelmingly demonstrate evidence for pipe-usage, and similar rates among English men and women (39.6%–64.2%), regardless of socioeconomic status. Women from both countries were highly unlikely to present with evidence for pipe-usage, indicating a preference for an alternative means of consumption, and were also far more likely to present with evidence for tobacco-usage in older age. Our results directly contradict the historical notion that women, particularly well-to-do women in the 19th century, were not consuming tobacco, but identify that its use perhaps became more socially acceptable as women aged. Further, we identify differences in the presence of pipe notches in different groups, which could indicate the preference for different ways of consuming tobacco according to gender, socioeconomic background, occupation, and differing norms between countries. This analysis provides nuance to historical concepts of who was, and was not, smoking during the postmedieval period, and paves the way for understanding the long-term health implications of a drug that has had vast and enduring repercussions for European society.</p>","PeriodicalId":14179,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","volume":"36 5","pages":"1184-1198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/oa.70157","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteoarchaeology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.70157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The frequency of tobacco use during the postmedieval period is widely underexplored; this has repercussions for our understanding of the intoxicant's health impacts during this time. Our study assesses the frequency rates of tobacco consumption in different social groups in England and the Netherlands, two countries in which tobacco use became quickly incorporated into the sociocultural fabric after its introduction to Europe in the 16th century. We assessed frequencies of evidence for tobacco use in 380 English and 318 Dutch individuals, using osteoarchaeological and biomolecular analyses. We examined use-rates in individuals from three different socioeconomic backgrounds: rural agricultural (Barton-upon-Humber; Middenbeemster), urban high-middle (St James's Gardens Burial Ground; Zwolle), and urban low-middle (St James's Gardens Burial Ground; Arnhem) status. Our results indicate high usage rates in Dutch men (63.6%–98.1%), who overwhelmingly demonstrate evidence for pipe-usage, and similar rates among English men and women (39.6%–64.2%), regardless of socioeconomic status. Women from both countries were highly unlikely to present with evidence for pipe-usage, indicating a preference for an alternative means of consumption, and were also far more likely to present with evidence for tobacco-usage in older age. Our results directly contradict the historical notion that women, particularly well-to-do women in the 19th century, were not consuming tobacco, but identify that its use perhaps became more socially acceptable as women aged. Further, we identify differences in the presence of pipe notches in different groups, which could indicate the preference for different ways of consuming tobacco according to gender, socioeconomic background, occupation, and differing norms between countries. This analysis provides nuance to historical concepts of who was, and was not, smoking during the postmedieval period, and paves the way for understanding the long-term health implications of a drug that has had vast and enduring repercussions for European society.

迫切的问题:烟草消费的频率在中世纪后(16 - 19世纪)英国和荷兰
中世纪后时期烟草使用的频率广泛未得到充分研究;这影响了我们对这段时间内麻醉品对健康影响的理解。我们的研究评估了英国和荷兰不同社会群体的烟草消费频率,这两个国家的烟草使用在16世纪被引入欧洲后迅速融入了社会文化结构。我们使用骨考古学和生物分子分析评估了380名英国人和318名荷兰人的烟草使用证据频率。我们研究了来自三种不同社会经济背景的个体的使用率:农村农业(巴顿-亨伯;米登比姆斯特),城市中高(圣詹姆斯花园墓地;兹沃勒)和城市中低(圣詹姆斯花园墓地;阿纳姆)地位。我们的研究结果表明,荷兰男性的使用率很高(63.6%-98.1%),他们压倒性地证明了管道使用的证据,而英国男性和女性的使用率相似(39.6%-64.2%),无论社会经济地位如何。这两个国家的妇女极不可能提供使用烟斗的证据,这表明她们更倾向于另一种消费方式,而且更有可能提供老年吸烟的证据。我们的研究结果直接反驳了女性,特别是19世纪富裕女性不吸烟的历史观念,但我们发现,随着女性年龄的增长,吸烟可能变得更容易被社会接受。此外,我们确定了不同群体中烟叶缺口存在的差异,这可能表明根据性别、社会经济背景、职业和不同国家之间的不同规范,人们对不同的烟草消费方式有不同的偏好。这一分析为中世纪后时期谁吸烟、谁不吸烟的历史概念提供了细微差别,并为理解这种对欧洲社会产生了巨大而持久影响的药物对健康的长期影响铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: The aim of the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology is to provide a forum for the publication of papers dealing with all aspects of the study of human and animal bones from archaeological contexts. The journal will publish original papers dealing with human or animal bone research from any area of the world. It will also publish short papers which give important preliminary observations from work in progress and it will publish book reviews. All papers will be subject to peer review. The journal will be aimed principally towards all those with a professional interest in the study of human and animal bones. This includes archaeologists, anthropologists, human and animal bone specialists, palaeopathologists and medical historians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书