Edge-Disjoint Spanning Trees, Eigenvalues, and Size of Graphs

IF 1 3区 数学 Q2 MATHEMATICS
Journal of Graph Theory Pub Date : 2026-10-12 Epub Date: 2026-06-21 DOI:10.1002/jgt.70087
Liu Chang, Shuchao Li, Minjie Zhang
{"title":"Edge-Disjoint Spanning Trees, Eigenvalues, and Size of Graphs","authors":"Liu Chang,&nbsp;Shuchao Li,&nbsp;Minjie Zhang","doi":"10.1002/jgt.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The spanning tree packing number of a graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, written by <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>, is defined as the maximum number of edge-disjoint spanning trees. The study of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is a classic problem in graph theory, and this parameter has important application in analyzing network robustness, routing optimization, and fault tolerance. Paul Seymour motivated the academia to establish the relationship between <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and eigenvalues of a connected graph. Let <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>δ</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> be the class of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>-vertex graphs with minimum degree <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>δ</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and let <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>m</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> denote the set of graphs of order <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and size <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>m</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> admitting exactly <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> edge-disjoint spanning trees. Fan, Gu, and Lin [J. Graph Theory, 104 (2023) 697-711] gave a sufficient size condition, together with its spectral analogue, to ensure that a graph <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>∈</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>δ</mi>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> satisfies <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>τ</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>⩾</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> under the condition <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>δ</mi>\n \n <mo>⩾</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. It is interesting to see that these problems are still open under the condition <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>⩽</mo>\n \n <mi>δ</mi>\n \n <mo>⩽</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. In this paper, we fill this gap. Then we address an open problem posed by Fan, Gu, and Lin [J. Graph Theory, 104 (2023) 697-711]: Determine the graphs among <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> having maximum spectral radius. Furthermore, they conjectured that <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </msub>\n \n <mo>∇</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </msub>\n \n <mo>∪</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is the unique graph among <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> attaining maximum spectral radius for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>⩾</mo>\n \n <mn>4</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>⩾</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math>. We show that, for <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>⩾</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>⩾</mo>\n \n <mn>5</mn>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </msub>\n \n <mo>∇</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mn>1</mn>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n \n <mo>∪</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mfrac>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mo>+</mo>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mn>2</mn>\n </mfrac>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <msub>\n <mi>K</mi>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> is the unique graph among <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>G</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n \n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n \n <mrow>\n <mi>n</mi>\n \n <mo>−</mo>\n \n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>,</mo>\n \n <mi>k</mi>\n </mrow>\n \n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> having maximum spectral radius. This resolves their open problem, and consequently disproves their conjecture.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Graph Theory","volume":"113 4","pages":"677-702"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Graph Theory","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgt.70087","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The spanning tree packing number of a graph G , written by τ ( G ) , is defined as the maximum number of edge-disjoint spanning trees. The study of τ ( G ) is a classic problem in graph theory, and this parameter has important application in analyzing network robustness, routing optimization, and fault tolerance. Paul Seymour motivated the academia to establish the relationship between τ ( G ) and eigenvalues of a connected graph. Let G n , δ be the class of n -vertex graphs with minimum degree δ and let G ( n , m , k ) denote the set of graphs of order n and size m admitting exactly k edge-disjoint spanning trees. Fan, Gu, and Lin [J. Graph Theory, 104 (2023) 697-711] gave a sufficient size condition, together with its spectral analogue, to ensure that a graph G ∈ G n , δ satisfies τ ( G ) ⩾ k under the condition δ ⩾ 2 k . It is interesting to see that these problems are still open under the condition k ⩽ δ ⩽ 2 k − 1 . In this paper, we fill this gap. Then we address an open problem posed by Fan, Gu, and Lin [J. Graph Theory, 104 (2023) 697-711]: Determine the graphs among G ( n , k ( n − 1 ) , k ) having maximum spectral radius. Furthermore, they conjectured that K k ∇ ( K k ∪ ( n − 2 k ) K 1 ) is the unique graph among G ( n , k ( n − 1 ) , k ) attaining maximum spectral radius for n ⩾ 4 and k ⩾ 2 . We show that, for n ⩾ k 2 + k + 2 2 with k ⩾ 5 , K k ∇ ( K 1 , k ( k − 1 ) 2 ∪ ( n − k 2 + k + 2 2 ) K 1 ) is the unique graph among G ( n , k ( n − 1 ) , k ) having maximum spectral radius. This resolves their open problem, and consequently disproves their conjecture.

边不相交生成树,特征值和图的大小
图G的生成树填充数,用τ (G)表示,定义为边不相交生成树的最大数目。研究τ (G)是图论中的一个经典问题,该参数在分析网络鲁棒性、路由优化和容错性等方面有着重要的应用。Paul Seymour促使学术界建立了连通图的τ (G)和特征值之间的关系。设G n,δ是具有最小度δ的n顶点图的类,并设G (n, m,K)表示n阶、大小为m的图的集合有k棵不相交的生成树。范,顾,林[J]。图论,104(2023)697-711]给出了一个足够的大小条件,以及它的谱模拟,以保证图G∈gn,δ满足τ (G)小于在δ大于或等于2 K的条件下。 我们证明,对于n大于或等于k2 + kk大于或等于5,K K∇k1,K (K−)1) 2∪(n−k)2 + k + 22K(1)是其中唯一的图G (n);K (n−1), k)具有最大的谱半径。 这就解决了他们的公开问题,从而推翻了他们的猜想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Graph Theory
Journal of Graph Theory 数学-数学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Graph Theory is devoted to a variety of topics in graph theory, such as structural results about graphs, graph algorithms with theoretical emphasis, and discrete optimization on graphs. The scope of the journal also includes related areas in combinatorics and the interaction of graph theory with other mathematical sciences. A subscription to the Journal of Graph Theory includes a subscription to the Journal of Combinatorial Designs .
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书