Research on transformer-Kolmogorov–Arnold neural network open-pit mine slope deformation prediction model based on temporal interferometric synthetic aperture radar

IF 2.1 4区 地球科学
Yufan Li, Chengyu Jiang, Chen Wang, Ting Lu, Shan Jiang, Shunyu Yang, Na Zhao
{"title":"Research on transformer-Kolmogorov–Arnold neural network open-pit mine slope deformation prediction model based on temporal interferometric synthetic aperture radar","authors":"Yufan Li,&nbsp;Chengyu Jiang,&nbsp;Chen Wang,&nbsp;Ting Lu,&nbsp;Shan Jiang,&nbsp;Shunyu Yang,&nbsp;Na Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s11600-026-02057-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Slope stability is critical to ensuring safe mining operations; yet, traditional monitoring techniques often suffer from insufficient spatial resolution, limited coverage, and inadequate predictive accuracy. To address these limitations, this study proposes a collaborative monitoring and prediction framework that integrates temporal interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) with deep learning, using an open-pit mine in Guizhou as a case study. Small baseline subset InSAR (SBAS-InSAR) results reveal maximum subsidence rates of − 40 mm·yr<sup>−1</sup> in the phosphate quarry and − 70 mm·yr<sup>−1</sup> in the waste dump, with cumulative settlements of 106 and 236 mm, respectively. Comparison with ground-based leveling measurements from 22 monitoring benchmarks across two field campaigns yielded a correlation coefficient <i>R</i> of 0.92 between the SBAS-InSAR and leveling datasets. Based on the SBAS-InSAR-derived deformation time series, four predictive models—Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Transformer, LSTM–Kolmogorov–Arnold Neural Network (KAN), and Transformer–KAN—were constructed and evaluated. Among them, the Transformer–KAN model exhibited the best performance. On average across the six evaluated feature points, the Transformer–KAN model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.12 (± 0.42) mm and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.98 (± 0.37) mm. At the best-performing point (Point F), the MAE and RMSE were 5.26 (± 0.27) mm and 6.81 (± 0.33) mm, respectively, representing a 42% improvement over the LSTM model at that location. The KAN module was used as a predictive component in the present study; its interpretability was not quantitatively evaluated. Further validation across additional sites is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":"74 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11600-026-02057-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Slope stability is critical to ensuring safe mining operations; yet, traditional monitoring techniques often suffer from insufficient spatial resolution, limited coverage, and inadequate predictive accuracy. To address these limitations, this study proposes a collaborative monitoring and prediction framework that integrates temporal interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) with deep learning, using an open-pit mine in Guizhou as a case study. Small baseline subset InSAR (SBAS-InSAR) results reveal maximum subsidence rates of − 40 mm·yr−1 in the phosphate quarry and − 70 mm·yr−1 in the waste dump, with cumulative settlements of 106 and 236 mm, respectively. Comparison with ground-based leveling measurements from 22 monitoring benchmarks across two field campaigns yielded a correlation coefficient R of 0.92 between the SBAS-InSAR and leveling datasets. Based on the SBAS-InSAR-derived deformation time series, four predictive models—Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Transformer, LSTM–Kolmogorov–Arnold Neural Network (KAN), and Transformer–KAN—were constructed and evaluated. Among them, the Transformer–KAN model exhibited the best performance. On average across the six evaluated feature points, the Transformer–KAN model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.12 (± 0.42) mm and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 7.98 (± 0.37) mm. At the best-performing point (Point F), the MAE and RMSE were 5.26 (± 0.27) mm and 6.81 (± 0.33) mm, respectively, representing a 42% improvement over the LSTM model at that location. The KAN module was used as a predictive component in the present study; its interpretability was not quantitatively evaluated. Further validation across additional sites is needed.

基于时序干涉合成孔径雷达的变压器- kolmogorov - arnold神经网络露天矿边坡变形预测模型研究
边坡稳定是保证矿山安全生产的关键;然而,传统的监测技术往往存在空间分辨率不足、覆盖范围有限和预测精度不足的问题。为了解决这些局限性,本研究提出了一个将时间干涉合成孔径雷达(InSAR)与深度学习相结合的协同监测和预测框架,并以贵州某露天矿为例进行了研究。小基线子集InSAR (SBAS-InSAR)结果显示,磷酸盐采石场的最大沉降速率为- 40 mm·yr - 1,排土场的最大沉降速率为- 70 mm·yr - 1,累积沉降量分别为106和236 mm。与来自22个野外监测基准的地面水准测量结果进行比较,SBAS-InSAR与水准数据集之间的相关系数R为0.92。基于sbas - insar导出的变形时间序列,构建了长短期记忆(LSTM)、Transformer、LSTM - kolmogorov - arnold神经网络(KAN)和Transformer - KAN 4个预测模型并进行了评估。其中,Transformer-KAN模型表现出最好的性能。在六个评估的特征点中,Transformer-KAN模型的平均绝对误差(MAE)为6.12(±0.42)mm,均方根误差(RMSE)为7.98(±0.37)mm。在最佳表现点(F点),MAE和RMSE分别为5.26(±0.27)mm和6.81(±0.33)mm,比LSTM模型在该位置提高了42%。本研究采用KAN模块作为预测成分;其可解释性没有定量评价。需要跨其他站点进行进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Geophysica
Acta Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
251
期刊介绍: Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书