Ex-Situ CO2 Mineralization: Bridging Laboratory Science and Industrial Reality. Part II: Techno-Economics, Life-Cycle Assessment, and Market-Driven Deployment Strategies
{"title":"Ex-Situ CO2 Mineralization: Bridging Laboratory Science and Industrial Reality. Part II: Techno-Economics, Life-Cycle Assessment, and Market-Driven Deployment Strategies","authors":"Babak Fayyaz-Najafi, Cesar Ovalles","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c02947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><em>Ex-situ</em> CO<sub>2</sub> mineralization\r\nis moving\r\nfrom laboratory demonstration toward early commercial deployment,\r\nbut gigaton-scale implementation requires credible economics, favorable\r\nlife-cycle performance, real product markets, and standards-based\r\nverification. This second part of a two-part review examines the techno-economic,\r\nenvironmental, market, policy, and certification dimensions of the\r\ntechnology. Processing costs for industrial-residue systems are approximately\r\n\\$30 to \\$80 per ton of CO<sub>2</sub> on a cradle-to-gate basis for\r\nfacilities colocated with the CO<sub>2</sub> source, excluding CO<sub>2</sub> capture and product credits, at a nominal 100 ktCO<sub>2</sub>/year scale and \\$0.08/kWh electricity; costs outside these boundary\r\nconditions differ substantially and are reported separately throughout.\r\nRevenue from carbonated aggregates, supplementary cementitious materials,\r\nprecipitated calcium carbonate, and carbon-removal credits can offset\r\na significant portion of these costs. Net carbon-removal efficiencies\r\nrange from approximately 50% to 95% across pathways, a spread driven\r\nprincipally by feedstock activation demand and grid carbon intensity\r\nrather than by carbonation chemistry; residue-based systems integrating\r\nrenewable energy typically achieve 75% to 95%, whereas activation-intensive\r\nnatural silicate routes remain more energy sensitive. Commercial operators\r\n(CarbonFree, Fortera, Neustark, Greenore) stand at TRL 7–9\r\nalongside earlier-stage ventures, with combined <em>nameplate</em> capacity of approximately 70–90 ktCO<sub>2</sub>/year and\r\nindependently verified delivered volumes that are substantially lower.\r\nConstruction materials are the primary near-term market, with demand\r\nfor low-carbon aggregates and cement additives growing rapidly. A\r\nbottom-up buildup of operational and publicly announced projects places\r\n2030 capacity at approximately 0.4–5 MtCO<sub>2</sub>/year.\r\nReaching the 1–2 GtCO<sub>2</sub>/year that IPCC-consistent\r\ncarbon-removal portfolios would assign to mineralization by 2050 requires\r\nsustained capacity growth of 38–43% per year for two decades\r\nand a cumulative capital of approximately \\$0.2–0.7 trillion\r\nfor the mineralization system. Gigaton-scale deployment is therefore\r\npresented as a conditional scenario with explicitly stated preconditions,\r\nnot as a forecast. Policy mechanisms, including enhanced 45Q credits,\r\nEU Innovation Fund support, and emerging carbon-removal procurement\r\nprograms, are catalyzing investment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"40 41","pages":"22359–22388"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c02947","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ex-situ CO2 mineralization
is moving
from laboratory demonstration toward early commercial deployment,
but gigaton-scale implementation requires credible economics, favorable
life-cycle performance, real product markets, and standards-based
verification. This second part of a two-part review examines the techno-economic,
environmental, market, policy, and certification dimensions of the
technology. Processing costs for industrial-residue systems are approximately
\$30 to \$80 per ton of CO2 on a cradle-to-gate basis for
facilities colocated with the CO2 source, excluding CO2 capture and product credits, at a nominal 100 ktCO2/year scale and \$0.08/kWh electricity; costs outside these boundary
conditions differ substantially and are reported separately throughout.
Revenue from carbonated aggregates, supplementary cementitious materials,
precipitated calcium carbonate, and carbon-removal credits can offset
a significant portion of these costs. Net carbon-removal efficiencies
range from approximately 50% to 95% across pathways, a spread driven
principally by feedstock activation demand and grid carbon intensity
rather than by carbonation chemistry; residue-based systems integrating
renewable energy typically achieve 75% to 95%, whereas activation-intensive
natural silicate routes remain more energy sensitive. Commercial operators
(CarbonFree, Fortera, Neustark, Greenore) stand at TRL 7–9
alongside earlier-stage ventures, with combined nameplate capacity of approximately 70–90 ktCO2/year and
independently verified delivered volumes that are substantially lower.
Construction materials are the primary near-term market, with demand
for low-carbon aggregates and cement additives growing rapidly. A
bottom-up buildup of operational and publicly announced projects places
2030 capacity at approximately 0.4–5 MtCO2/year.
Reaching the 1–2 GtCO2/year that IPCC-consistent
carbon-removal portfolios would assign to mineralization by 2050 requires
sustained capacity growth of 38–43% per year for two decades
and a cumulative capital of approximately \$0.2–0.7 trillion
for the mineralization system. Gigaton-scale deployment is therefore
presented as a conditional scenario with explicitly stated preconditions,
not as a forecast. Policy mechanisms, including enhanced 45Q credits,
EU Innovation Fund support, and emerging carbon-removal procurement
programs, are catalyzing investment.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.