Martina Pasqualetti, Jakob C. B. Schwenk, Andrea Alamia
{"title":"Neural Oscillatory Signatures of Predictive Processing in Visual Statistical Learning","authors":"Martina Pasqualetti, Jakob C. B. Schwenk, Andrea Alamia","doi":"10.1111/nyas.70424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several studies suggest that neural oscillations play a role in cognition, including predictive processing. Recent models propose that backward alpha-band traveling waves reflect top-down predictions, while forward waves may reflect bottom-up prediction errors. We tested this hypothesis using a visual statistical learning task in which participants (<i>N</i> = 31) detected target shapes presented with varying levels of predictability. Electrophysiological activity and pupillometry were recorded throughout the task. Behavioral results showed faster responses for predictable targets, and pupil dilation increased for unexpected shapes. Evoked response potential analyses revealed predictability effects on the P300 component across occipital and frontal electrodes, along with modulation of alpha oscillations. However, traveling wave analyses did not show a clear effect of predictability between conditions. Instead, wave patterns showed a modest association with individual differences in cognitive strategy, with stronger top-down alpha-band waves in participants who relied more on statistical regularities. Overall, these findings challenge the view that alpha-band traveling waves implement predictive coding during visual perception, suggesting instead that they may reflect more general cognitive strategies rather than specific predictive processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"1564 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/nyas.70424","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.70424","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several studies suggest that neural oscillations play a role in cognition, including predictive processing. Recent models propose that backward alpha-band traveling waves reflect top-down predictions, while forward waves may reflect bottom-up prediction errors. We tested this hypothesis using a visual statistical learning task in which participants (N = 31) detected target shapes presented with varying levels of predictability. Electrophysiological activity and pupillometry were recorded throughout the task. Behavioral results showed faster responses for predictable targets, and pupil dilation increased for unexpected shapes. Evoked response potential analyses revealed predictability effects on the P300 component across occipital and frontal electrodes, along with modulation of alpha oscillations. However, traveling wave analyses did not show a clear effect of predictability between conditions. Instead, wave patterns showed a modest association with individual differences in cognitive strategy, with stronger top-down alpha-band waves in participants who relied more on statistical regularities. Overall, these findings challenge the view that alpha-band traveling waves implement predictive coding during visual perception, suggesting instead that they may reflect more general cognitive strategies rather than specific predictive processes.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.