E. J. Milner-Gulland, Éilish Farrelly, Talitha Bromwich, Cecil Haverkamp, Stefania A. Karlsdottir, Noelle F. Kumpel, Lain E. Pardo, Rebecca Shaw, Thomas B. White, Guido Broekhoven, Sarah K. Jones, Michael Obersteiner, Piero Visconti, Kotone Yamamoto, Mike Barrett
{"title":"A Critical Year for Nature: Now Is the Time to Accelerate Action on the Global Biodiversity Framework","authors":"E. J. Milner-Gulland, Éilish Farrelly, Talitha Bromwich, Cecil Haverkamp, Stefania A. Karlsdottir, Noelle F. Kumpel, Lain E. Pardo, Rebecca Shaw, Thomas B. White, Guido Broekhoven, Sarah K. Jones, Michael Obersteiner, Piero Visconti, Kotone Yamamoto, Mike Barrett","doi":"10.1111/con4.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In October 2026, Parties to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) will convene for COP17 to review progress against the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) adopted in 2022. A global report provides a summary of collective progress, primarily drawing from government self-reporting at the halfway mark to 2030, the target year for taking urgent action to halt and reverse nature loss. Data suggest that action on the KMGBF to date remains highly insufficient. Simultaneously, the decline of biodiversity is continuing, with a real danger of reaching irreversible tipping points. We highlight four key needs to help turn this around: (i) an independent mechanism to track national and local efforts on nature to complement formal government reporting; (ii) an approach for prioritizing the most impactful potential country actions, incorporating principles of fairness and ability to act; (iii) broader whole-of-society dialogue in and across countries on what works and what is needed; and (iv) a platform to facilitate context-specific scientific insights to support country-level and global action. To turn these needs into opportunities, we propose specific tools already under development which could complement existing CBD mechanisms to reinforce and account for collective action during these critical next few years.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"19 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/con4.70089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/con4.70089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In October 2026, Parties to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) will convene for COP17 to review progress against the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) adopted in 2022. A global report provides a summary of collective progress, primarily drawing from government self-reporting at the halfway mark to 2030, the target year for taking urgent action to halt and reverse nature loss. Data suggest that action on the KMGBF to date remains highly insufficient. Simultaneously, the decline of biodiversity is continuing, with a real danger of reaching irreversible tipping points. We highlight four key needs to help turn this around: (i) an independent mechanism to track national and local efforts on nature to complement formal government reporting; (ii) an approach for prioritizing the most impactful potential country actions, incorporating principles of fairness and ability to act; (iii) broader whole-of-society dialogue in and across countries on what works and what is needed; and (iv) a platform to facilitate context-specific scientific insights to support country-level and global action. To turn these needs into opportunities, we propose specific tools already under development which could complement existing CBD mechanisms to reinforce and account for collective action during these critical next few years.
期刊介绍:
Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.