{"title":"Antifibrotics with Cross-Indication Potential: Challenges and Progress Towards a Universal Fibrosis-Modifying Therapy.","authors":"Claudia Gyimah, Timothy Dempsey, Andrew H Limper","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S566334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Organ fibrosis is a chronic, progressive condition that frequently results in organ dysfunction and failure. Despite its high morbidity and mortality, substantial therapeutic gaps persist for fibrosis across all organ systems. The compartmentalization of fibrosis research by organ system has impeded the development of antifibrotic therapies with cross-organ applicability. However, the shared pathobiology of fibrosis involves convergent signaling through the TGF-β/SMAD axis, receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated fibroblast activation, Wnt/β-catenin-driven myofibroblast differentiation, and amplification of oxidative stress. These conserved mechanisms support the emerging concept of fibrotic endotypes and justify the pursuit of cross-indication antifibrotic drug development, specifically for fibrotic processes in lung, liver, kidney and heart. This review examines the cross-indication potential of currently approved antifibrotics (nintedanib, pirfenidone, nerandomilast) and emerging agents by evaluating their mechanisms of action, preclinical and clinical evidence, translational potential in non-pulmonary fibrosis, and insights from recent clinical trials. Recent data from Phase 3 trials underscore the necessity of multi-target rather than single-target strategies. Key barriers to universal antifibrotic therapy, such as target redundancy, gaps in preclinical-to-clinical translation, biological heterogeneity, and suboptimal trial design, are also discussed. We propose that an endotype guided, precision-medicine strategy using multi-omics profiling and cross-organ adaptive trial designs may help bridge this gap and remains the most promising path toward a universal fibrosis-modifying therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"20 ","pages":"566334"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13654254/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S566334","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Organ fibrosis is a chronic, progressive condition that frequently results in organ dysfunction and failure. Despite its high morbidity and mortality, substantial therapeutic gaps persist for fibrosis across all organ systems. The compartmentalization of fibrosis research by organ system has impeded the development of antifibrotic therapies with cross-organ applicability. However, the shared pathobiology of fibrosis involves convergent signaling through the TGF-β/SMAD axis, receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated fibroblast activation, Wnt/β-catenin-driven myofibroblast differentiation, and amplification of oxidative stress. These conserved mechanisms support the emerging concept of fibrotic endotypes and justify the pursuit of cross-indication antifibrotic drug development, specifically for fibrotic processes in lung, liver, kidney and heart. This review examines the cross-indication potential of currently approved antifibrotics (nintedanib, pirfenidone, nerandomilast) and emerging agents by evaluating their mechanisms of action, preclinical and clinical evidence, translational potential in non-pulmonary fibrosis, and insights from recent clinical trials. Recent data from Phase 3 trials underscore the necessity of multi-target rather than single-target strategies. Key barriers to universal antifibrotic therapy, such as target redundancy, gaps in preclinical-to-clinical translation, biological heterogeneity, and suboptimal trial design, are also discussed. We propose that an endotype guided, precision-medicine strategy using multi-omics profiling and cross-organ adaptive trial designs may help bridge this gap and remains the most promising path toward a universal fibrosis-modifying therapy.
期刊介绍:
Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications.
The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas.
Specific topics covered by the journal include:
Drug target identification and validation
Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution
Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways
New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery*
Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes)
Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes
Fragment-based drug discovery
Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology
Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products**
Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development
Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing)
Preclinical development studies
Translational animal models
Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways
Toxicology
Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy
Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics
Clinical drug evaluation
Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.