Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Chronic Stroke: An Agreement Study Between the IPAQ-SF and ActiGraph Measures.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Teresa L Dias, Fernando Ribeiro, Carla M Pereira
{"title":"Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Chronic Stroke: An Agreement Study Between the IPAQ-SF and ActiGraph Measures.","authors":"Teresa L Dias, Fernando Ribeiro, Carla M Pereira","doi":"10.1177/10538135261491937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and ActiGraph accelerometers are widely used and internationally recommended to assess physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST). However, their agreement in individuals with chronic stroke remains unclear.ObjectivesTo quantify the magnitude of agreement between IPAQ-SF and ActiGraph-derived weekly moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), total PA, and ST in chronic stroke survivors.MethodsFifty community-dwelling adults with chronic stroke who walked independently were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Participants wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+) on the non-paretic side of the waist for seven consecutive days. The IPAQ-SF was completed via interview on the following day.ResultsIPAQ-SF and ActiGraph-derived estimates showed substantial individual-level discrepancies, with wide limits of agreement (LoA) across outcomes. For MVPA, the mean ratio was 1.02 (95%CI: 0.49 to 2.11; ratio LoA: 0.01 to 154.62). For total PA, the median ratio was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.14; non-parametric ratio LoA: 0.00 to 1.33). For ST, the mean ratio was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.78 to 0.92; ratio LoA: 0.47 to 1.53).ConclusionFindings indicate poor individual-level agreement between the IPAQ-SF and ActiGraph-derived estimates, with wide LoA and evidence of heteroscedasticity. At the group level, the IPAQ-SF underestimated total PA and ST, whereas MVPA showed no evidence of fixed bias. Although the IPAQ-SF may provide a broad descriptive assessment of PA and ST at the group level, it should not be used interchangeably with ActiGraph for individual-level estimation in individuals with chronic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538135261491937"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135261491937","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and ActiGraph accelerometers are widely used and internationally recommended to assess physical activity (PA) and sedentary time (ST). However, their agreement in individuals with chronic stroke remains unclear.ObjectivesTo quantify the magnitude of agreement between IPAQ-SF and ActiGraph-derived weekly moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), total PA, and ST in chronic stroke survivors.MethodsFifty community-dwelling adults with chronic stroke who walked independently were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Participants wore an accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X+) on the non-paretic side of the waist for seven consecutive days. The IPAQ-SF was completed via interview on the following day.ResultsIPAQ-SF and ActiGraph-derived estimates showed substantial individual-level discrepancies, with wide limits of agreement (LoA) across outcomes. For MVPA, the mean ratio was 1.02 (95%CI: 0.49 to 2.11; ratio LoA: 0.01 to 154.62). For total PA, the median ratio was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.14; non-parametric ratio LoA: 0.00 to 1.33). For ST, the mean ratio was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.78 to 0.92; ratio LoA: 0.47 to 1.53).ConclusionFindings indicate poor individual-level agreement between the IPAQ-SF and ActiGraph-derived estimates, with wide LoA and evidence of heteroscedasticity. At the group level, the IPAQ-SF underestimated total PA and ST, whereas MVPA showed no evidence of fixed bias. Although the IPAQ-SF may provide a broad descriptive assessment of PA and ST at the group level, it should not be used interchangeably with ActiGraph for individual-level estimation in individuals with chronic stroke.

慢性脑卒中的身体活动和久坐时间:IPAQ-SF和ActiGraph测量的一致性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书