Translational Readiness of Dental Pulp Stem Cell and Extracellular-Vesicle Products: Manufacturing, Delivery, Safety, and Clinical Development.

IF 2
Madina A Kurmanalina, Amin Tamadon, Elnara K Ismagulova, Aruzhan M Aitmukhanbetova, Ramazon Safarzoda Sharoffidin
{"title":"Translational Readiness of Dental Pulp Stem Cell and Extracellular-Vesicle Products: Manufacturing, Delivery, Safety, and Clinical Development.","authors":"Madina A Kurmanalina, Amin Tamadon, Elnara K Ismagulova, Aruzhan M Aitmukhanbetova, Ramazon Safarzoda Sharoffidin","doi":"10.1177/15473287261496095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED), and extracellular vesicles (EVs) show regenerative potential, but clinical translation depends on a reproducible product-process-procedure system. This systematic scoping review mapped how DPSC- and EV-containing dental products are defined, manufactured, formulated, dosed, delivered, monitored, and regulated. Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance (JBI) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), an umbrella-assisted strategy combined two recent high-coverage reviews with a targeted update through July 15, 2026. Data were charted for source, characterization, carrier, dose, delivery, visualization, safety, outcomes, and manufacturing readiness; a nine-domain review-level framework (Translational Readiness Appraisal for Dental cell and EV products) summarized relative maturity without serving as a validated clinical score. The map comprised 52 unique primary reports and nine methodological or secondary sources. Scaffold-based DPSC/SHED studies generally favored cell-containing constructs, but most were heterogeneous short-term animal experiments. Small human studies of autologous DPSC or SHED products reported encouraging feasibility and few serious safety signals, yet were underpowered for effectiveness or uncommon harms. Dental EV evidence remained predominantly preclinical; isolation, particle-normalized dosing, potency, storage, biodistribution, and batch comparability were frequently incomplete. Magnification was not consistently standardized as a delivery variable. Relative readiness was highest for autologous DPSC pulp products, intermediate for DPSC-scaffold bone or periodontal products, and low for dental EV products. Translation now requires indication-specific potency assays, carrier-product codevelopment, dose-response and biodistribution studies, documented delivery fidelity, standardized outcomes, long-term safety follow-up, and explicit good manufacturing practice (GMP) and regulatory strategies before confirmatory trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94214,"journal":{"name":"Stem cells and development","volume":" ","pages":"15473287261496095"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem cells and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15473287261496095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs), stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED), and extracellular vesicles (EVs) show regenerative potential, but clinical translation depends on a reproducible product-process-procedure system. This systematic scoping review mapped how DPSC- and EV-containing dental products are defined, manufactured, formulated, dosed, delivered, monitored, and regulated. Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance (JBI) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), an umbrella-assisted strategy combined two recent high-coverage reviews with a targeted update through July 15, 2026. Data were charted for source, characterization, carrier, dose, delivery, visualization, safety, outcomes, and manufacturing readiness; a nine-domain review-level framework (Translational Readiness Appraisal for Dental cell and EV products) summarized relative maturity without serving as a validated clinical score. The map comprised 52 unique primary reports and nine methodological or secondary sources. Scaffold-based DPSC/SHED studies generally favored cell-containing constructs, but most were heterogeneous short-term animal experiments. Small human studies of autologous DPSC or SHED products reported encouraging feasibility and few serious safety signals, yet were underpowered for effectiveness or uncommon harms. Dental EV evidence remained predominantly preclinical; isolation, particle-normalized dosing, potency, storage, biodistribution, and batch comparability were frequently incomplete. Magnification was not consistently standardized as a delivery variable. Relative readiness was highest for autologous DPSC pulp products, intermediate for DPSC-scaffold bone or periodontal products, and low for dental EV products. Translation now requires indication-specific potency assays, carrier-product codevelopment, dose-response and biodistribution studies, documented delivery fidelity, standardized outcomes, long-term safety follow-up, and explicit good manufacturing practice (GMP) and regulatory strategies before confirmatory trials.

牙髓干细胞和细胞外囊泡产品的转化准备:制造、交付、安全性和临床发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书