A Scoping Review of Reproductive Coercion and Abuse During Pregnancy.

IF 6.7 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Elaheh Ghaemi Mahdavi, Amanda Taylor, Clemence Due, Leah S Sharman
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Reproductive Coercion and Abuse During Pregnancy.","authors":"Elaheh Ghaemi Mahdavi, Amanda Taylor, Clemence Due, Leah S Sharman","doi":"10.1177/15248380261480149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) during pregnancy encompasses behaviours that pressure, manipulate, or force decisions about continuing or terminating a pregnancy. Despite its serious consequences, RCA during pregnancy remains under-examined. This scoping review aimed to synthesise existing evidence on RCA during pregnancy, including prevalence, forms, and other related factors. In addition, the review aimed to identify gaps in existing literature to inform future research. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Scoping Review guidelines, four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO) were searched up to March 2025. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed and reported primary data on RCA during pregnancy. Data were charted for study design, population, type of RCA, perpetrator, and findings. Qualitative data were explored thematically, while quantitative findings were summarised descriptively. Seventy-six studies were included in the final review. Reported prevalence ranged from <1% to 68%, reflecting inconsistent definitions and measures. Qualitative studies described varied forms of RCA during pregnancy, including threats, pressure, deception, and systemic control by partners, family, or cultural structures. Quantitative studies largely focussed on RCA towards abortion by male partners, under-capturing RCA towards pregnancy continuation. Evidence suggests coercion towards pregnancy continuation may be equally or more common but less often recognised, partly due to stigma, societal ideals of motherhood, and provider discomfort discussing abortion. RCA during pregnancy was associated with emotional and health impacts, particularly among women facing intersecting vulnerabilities. Improved measurement tools, inclusion of diverse populations and men, and evaluations of interventions are urgently needed in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"15248380261480149"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380261480149","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reproductive coercion and abuse (RCA) during pregnancy encompasses behaviours that pressure, manipulate, or force decisions about continuing or terminating a pregnancy. Despite its serious consequences, RCA during pregnancy remains under-examined. This scoping review aimed to synthesise existing evidence on RCA during pregnancy, including prevalence, forms, and other related factors. In addition, the review aimed to identify gaps in existing literature to inform future research. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses - Scoping Review guidelines, four databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and PsycINFO) were searched up to March 2025. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed and reported primary data on RCA during pregnancy. Data were charted for study design, population, type of RCA, perpetrator, and findings. Qualitative data were explored thematically, while quantitative findings were summarised descriptively. Seventy-six studies were included in the final review. Reported prevalence ranged from <1% to 68%, reflecting inconsistent definitions and measures. Qualitative studies described varied forms of RCA during pregnancy, including threats, pressure, deception, and systemic control by partners, family, or cultural structures. Quantitative studies largely focussed on RCA towards abortion by male partners, under-capturing RCA towards pregnancy continuation. Evidence suggests coercion towards pregnancy continuation may be equally or more common but less often recognised, partly due to stigma, societal ideals of motherhood, and provider discomfort discussing abortion. RCA during pregnancy was associated with emotional and health impacts, particularly among women facing intersecting vulnerabilities. Improved measurement tools, inclusion of diverse populations and men, and evaluations of interventions are urgently needed in future research.

怀孕期间生殖强迫和虐待的范围审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书