The 'R sign' as a potential risk factor for progression of uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection: a case series.

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European Heart Journal: Case Reports Pub Date : 2026-09-18 eCollection Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjcr/ytag707
Dan Rong, Shaofan Wang, Jianhan Yin, Yangyang Ge, Feng Liu, Wei Guo
{"title":"The 'R sign' as a potential risk factor for progression of uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection: a case series.","authors":"Dan Rong, Shaofan Wang, Jianhan Yin, Yangyang Ge, Feng Liu, Wei Guo","doi":"10.1093/ehjcr/ytag707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complicated and uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) need distinct therapeutic pathways. While TBAD is a complex and dynamic clinical entity, ∼75% of cases present as uncomplicated initially. However, up to half of these may progress to complicated TBAD, highlighting the need for better prognostic tools. In this case series, we report a novel potential radiological risk factor for progression, the 'R sign', to contribute to a deeper understanding of this disease's behaviour.</p><p><strong>Case summary: </strong>We present two male patients with TBAD. Both cases exhibited a localized dissection at the top of the aortic arch's greater curvature on computed tomography angiography (CTA), which we term the 'R sign'. Both patients were initially admitted with uncomplicated TBAD. Patient 1: a 46-year-old man was stable on medical therapy until experiencing sudden chest tightness, at which point CTA confirmed progression to Type A dissection. Patient 2: a 54-year-old man, also managed medically for uncomplicated TBAD, suffered a sudden recurrence of back pain, with CTA confirming progression to Type A dissection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This case series highlights a previously unrecognized subtype of aortic dissection. In both presented cases, this specific form of TBAD progressed to Type A during the acute phase. Early identification of this high-risk uncomplicated TBAD variant is critical for patient prognosis, as it may need urgent intervention as a complicated TBAD. We present this entity to raise awareness and call for further multi-centre studies to validate our observations in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11910,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Case Reports","volume":"10 10","pages":"ytag707"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13652012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal: Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytag707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complicated and uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) need distinct therapeutic pathways. While TBAD is a complex and dynamic clinical entity, ∼75% of cases present as uncomplicated initially. However, up to half of these may progress to complicated TBAD, highlighting the need for better prognostic tools. In this case series, we report a novel potential radiological risk factor for progression, the 'R sign', to contribute to a deeper understanding of this disease's behaviour.

Case summary: We present two male patients with TBAD. Both cases exhibited a localized dissection at the top of the aortic arch's greater curvature on computed tomography angiography (CTA), which we term the 'R sign'. Both patients were initially admitted with uncomplicated TBAD. Patient 1: a 46-year-old man was stable on medical therapy until experiencing sudden chest tightness, at which point CTA confirmed progression to Type A dissection. Patient 2: a 54-year-old man, also managed medically for uncomplicated TBAD, suffered a sudden recurrence of back pain, with CTA confirming progression to Type A dissection.

Conclusion: This case series highlights a previously unrecognized subtype of aortic dissection. In both presented cases, this specific form of TBAD progressed to Type A during the acute phase. Early identification of this high-risk uncomplicated TBAD variant is critical for patient prognosis, as it may need urgent intervention as a complicated TBAD. We present this entity to raise awareness and call for further multi-centre studies to validate our observations in larger cohorts.

“R标志”作为无并发症的B型主动脉夹层进展的潜在危险因素:一个病例系列
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Heart Journal: Case Reports
European Heart Journal: Case Reports Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
451
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书