Chronic pain in narcolepsy reflects interacting neurobiological and psychological mechanisms: a mini-review.

IF 2
Frontiers in sleep Pub Date : 2026-09-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frsle.2026.1930803
Maria Munch-Menzer, Birgitte Rahbek Kornum
{"title":"Chronic pain in narcolepsy reflects interacting neurobiological and psychological mechanisms: a mini-review.","authors":"Maria Munch-Menzer, Birgitte Rahbek Kornum","doi":"10.3389/frsle.2026.1930803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain prevalence is increased in the sleep disorder narcolepsy, but the underlying reason for this remains debated. This mini review summarizes and discusses current evidence on links between narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and type 2 (NT2) and chronic pain, exploring whether pain is best understood as a consequence of the pathophysiology or secondary to its manifestations and comorbidities. Registry-based and self-reported data indicate a high prevalence of chronic pain in NT1, while objective pain tests show inconsistent differences between NT1 and healthy individuals. This discrepancy suggests involvement of secondary mechanisms not readily captured by experimental pain testing. Comparable pain prevalence in NT1 and NT2 also speaks against orexin deficiency as a sole driver of chronic pain in NT1. Alternatively, altered dopaminergic signaling downstream of orexin could be a shared contributor to pain in NT1 and other fatigue-related conditions. Finally, the presence of activating autoantibodies in NT1 suggests a possible immune-mediated component for some patients. Overall, chronic pain is highly prevalent in both NT1 and NT2. It likely arises from a combination of neurobiological and psychological factors, with immune mechanisms as a possible additional contributor, rather than, in NT1, orexin dysfunction alone. This perspective highlights the clinical need for more holistic treatment approaches and for future studies with improved case-control matching, larger NT1 samples, especially among patients with chronic pain, and more detailed comparisons with NT2.</p>","PeriodicalId":73106,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in sleep","volume":"5 ","pages":"1930803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13650916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2026.1930803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic pain prevalence is increased in the sleep disorder narcolepsy, but the underlying reason for this remains debated. This mini review summarizes and discusses current evidence on links between narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and type 2 (NT2) and chronic pain, exploring whether pain is best understood as a consequence of the pathophysiology or secondary to its manifestations and comorbidities. Registry-based and self-reported data indicate a high prevalence of chronic pain in NT1, while objective pain tests show inconsistent differences between NT1 and healthy individuals. This discrepancy suggests involvement of secondary mechanisms not readily captured by experimental pain testing. Comparable pain prevalence in NT1 and NT2 also speaks against orexin deficiency as a sole driver of chronic pain in NT1. Alternatively, altered dopaminergic signaling downstream of orexin could be a shared contributor to pain in NT1 and other fatigue-related conditions. Finally, the presence of activating autoantibodies in NT1 suggests a possible immune-mediated component for some patients. Overall, chronic pain is highly prevalent in both NT1 and NT2. It likely arises from a combination of neurobiological and psychological factors, with immune mechanisms as a possible additional contributor, rather than, in NT1, orexin dysfunction alone. This perspective highlights the clinical need for more holistic treatment approaches and for future studies with improved case-control matching, larger NT1 samples, especially among patients with chronic pain, and more detailed comparisons with NT2.

发作性睡病的慢性疼痛反映了相互作用的神经生物学和心理机制:一个小回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书