Molecular prevalence and diagnostic gene targets of Anaplasma, Babesia, Theileria, and Trypanosoma in cattle and buffaloes across Southeast Asia (2015-2025): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Veterinary World Pub Date : 2026-09-30 Epub Date: 2026-09-14 DOI:10.14202/vetworld.2026.4054-4068
Nitipon Srionrod, Tran Nhat Thang, Pornchai Pornpanom, Noppason Pangprasit
{"title":"Molecular prevalence and diagnostic gene targets of Anaplasma, Babesia, Theileria, and Trypanosoma in cattle and buffaloes across Southeast Asia (2015-2025): A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Nitipon Srionrod, Tran Nhat Thang, Pornchai Pornpanom, Noppason Pangprasit","doi":"10.14202/vetworld.2026.4054-4068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Hemoparasitic infections caused by <i>Anaplasma</i>, <i>Babesia</i>, <i>Theileria</i>, and <i>Trypanosoma</i> adversely affect cattle and buffalo health, resulting in economic losses and reduced livestock productivity in Southeast Asia. Although numerous molecular epidemiological studies have been conducted in individual countries, a comprehensive regional synthesis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed prevalence and molecular diagnostic targets has been lacking. This study aimed to estimate the pooled molecular prevalence of major hemoparasites in cattle and buffaloes across Southeast Asia, summarize the PCR target genes used for their detection, and investigate the effects of geographical region and host species on prevalence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were searched for studies published between 2015 and December 31, 2025. Cross-sectional studies conducted in Southeast Asia that used PCR-based methods and reported extractable prevalence data were included. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the I² statistic, whereas meta-regression was performed to evaluate the influence of geographical region (mainland versus maritime Southeast Asia) and host species. Publication bias was assessed for <i>Babesia</i> spp.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two cross-sectional studies involving 5,789 cattle and 901 buffaloes met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3%-38%) for <i>Anaplasma</i> spp., 18% (95% CI: 11%-28%) for <i>Babesia</i> spp., 11% (95% CI: 3%-35%) for <i>Theileria</i> spp., and 11% (95% CI: 4%-28%) for <i>Trypanosoma</i> <i>evansi</i>. Species-specific pooled prevalences were 5% for <i>Anaplasma marginale</i>, 10% for <i>Babesia</i> <i>bigemina</i>, 9% for <i>Babesia</i> <i>bovis</i>, and 10% for <i>Theileria</i> <i>orientalis</i>. Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed across all analyses. Meta-regression identified a significantly higher prevalence of <i>B.</i> <i>bovis</i> in maritime than mainland Southeast Asia (p = 0.0048), whereas no significant regional or host species effects were detected for the remaining hemoparasites. The review also compiled the principal PCR target genes used for molecular diagnosis, including <i>16S rRNA</i>, <i>groEL</i>, <i>MSP4</i>, <i>RAP-1a</i>, <i>AMA-1</i>, <i>SBP-2</i>, <i>SBP-4</i>, <i>MSA</i>, <i>MPSP</i>, <i>RoTat</i> 1.2 <i>VSG</i>, <i>ITS1</i>, <i>ITS2</i>, and satellite DNA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Major bovine hemoparasites remain widely distributed across Southeast Asia, highlighting the need for strengthened molecular surveillance and standardized diagnostic approaches. This study provides the first comprehensive regional synthesis of PCR-confirmed prevalence and molecular diagnostic targets for major hemoparasites in cattle and buffaloes, offering valuable evidence to support veterinary diagnostics, surveillance programs, and disease control strategies based on a One Health approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":23587,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary World","volume":"19 9","pages":"4054-4068"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13650288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2026.4054-4068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Hemoparasitic infections caused by Anaplasma, Babesia, Theileria, and Trypanosoma adversely affect cattle and buffalo health, resulting in economic losses and reduced livestock productivity in Southeast Asia. Although numerous molecular epidemiological studies have been conducted in individual countries, a comprehensive regional synthesis of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-confirmed prevalence and molecular diagnostic targets has been lacking. This study aimed to estimate the pooled molecular prevalence of major hemoparasites in cattle and buffaloes across Southeast Asia, summarize the PCR target genes used for their detection, and investigate the effects of geographical region and host species on prevalence.

Materials and methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were searched for studies published between 2015 and December 31, 2025. Cross-sectional studies conducted in Southeast Asia that used PCR-based methods and reported extractable prevalence data were included. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and the I² statistic, whereas meta-regression was performed to evaluate the influence of geographical region (mainland versus maritime Southeast Asia) and host species. Publication bias was assessed for Babesia spp.

Results: Twenty-two cross-sectional studies involving 5,789 cattle and 901 buffaloes met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence was 12% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3%-38%) for Anaplasma spp., 18% (95% CI: 11%-28%) for Babesia spp., 11% (95% CI: 3%-35%) for Theileria spp., and 11% (95% CI: 4%-28%) for Trypanosoma evansi. Species-specific pooled prevalences were 5% for Anaplasma marginale, 10% for Babesia bigemina, 9% for Babesia bovis, and 10% for Theileria orientalis. Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed across all analyses. Meta-regression identified a significantly higher prevalence of B. bovis in maritime than mainland Southeast Asia (p = 0.0048), whereas no significant regional or host species effects were detected for the remaining hemoparasites. The review also compiled the principal PCR target genes used for molecular diagnosis, including 16S rRNA, groEL, MSP4, RAP-1a, AMA-1, SBP-2, SBP-4, MSA, MPSP, RoTat 1.2 VSG, ITS1, ITS2, and satellite DNA.

Conclusion: Major bovine hemoparasites remain widely distributed across Southeast Asia, highlighting the need for strengthened molecular surveillance and standardized diagnostic approaches. This study provides the first comprehensive regional synthesis of PCR-confirmed prevalence and molecular diagnostic targets for major hemoparasites in cattle and buffaloes, offering valuable evidence to support veterinary diagnostics, surveillance programs, and disease control strategies based on a One Health approach.

东南亚地区牛和水牛无形体、巴贝虫、泰氏杆菌和锥虫病的分子患病率和诊断基因靶点(2015-2025):系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景与目的:由无形体、巴贝虫、伊氏杆菌和锥虫引起的血液寄生虫感染对东南亚地区的牛和水牛健康造成不利影响,造成经济损失并降低牲畜生产力。虽然在个别国家进行了大量的分子流行病学研究,但缺乏聚合酶链反应(PCR)确认的患病率和分子诊断目标的综合区域合成。本研究旨在估计东南亚地区牛和水牛主要血液寄生虫的分子流行率,总结PCR检测的靶基因,并探讨地理区域和宿主物种对流行率的影响。材料和方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。PubMed, ScienceDirect和Scopus检索了2015年至2025年12月31日之间发表的研究。在东南亚进行的横断面研究使用基于聚合酶链反应的方法,并报告了可提取的患病率数据。使用随机效应荟萃分析计算合并患病率估计值。异质性采用Cochran’s Q检验和I²统计量进行评估,而元回归则评估地理区域(大陆与东南亚海洋)和宿主物种的影响。结果:涉及5,789头牛和901头水牛的22项横断面研究符合纳入标准。无形体虫的总患病率为12%(95%可信区间[CI]: 3%-38%),巴贝斯虫为18% (95% CI: 11%-28%),伊氏芽孢杆菌为11% (95% CI: 3%-35%),伊氏锥虫为11% (95% CI: 4%-28%)。物种特异性总患病率为边缘无形体5%,双卵巴贝斯虫10%,牛巴贝斯虫9%,东方巴贝斯虫10%。在所有分析中观察到显著的研究间异质性。meta回归发现,海洋地区的牛b虫流行率明显高于东南亚大陆地区(p = 0.0048),而其余的血液寄生虫没有发现显著的区域或宿主物种影响。本文还整理了用于分子诊断的主要PCR靶基因,包括16S rRNA、groEL、MSP4、RAP-1a、AMA-1、SBP-2、SBP-4、MSA、MPSP、RoTat 1.2 VSG、ITS1、ITS2和卫星DNA。结论:主要的牛血寄生虫在东南亚地区仍然广泛分布,这突出了加强分子监测和标准化诊断方法的必要性。本研究首次对牛和水牛中主要血液寄生虫的pcr确认流行率和分子诊断靶点进行了全面的区域综合,为支持基于“同一个健康”方法的兽医诊断、监测计划和疾病控制策略提供了有价值的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary World
Veterinary World Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
317
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary World publishes high quality papers focusing on Veterinary and Animal Science. The fields of study are bacteriology, parasitology, pathology, virology, immunology, mycology, public health, biotechnology, meat science, fish diseases, nutrition, gynecology, genetics, wildlife, laboratory animals, animal models of human infections, prion diseases and epidemiology. Studies on zoonotic and emerging infections are highly appreciated. Review articles are highly appreciated. All articles published by Veterinary World are made freely and permanently accessible online. All articles to Veterinary World are posted online immediately as they are ready for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书