Participation of Patients With Gynecologic Cancer in Phase I Clinical Trials: Experience From Two National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers.

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Anusha Adkoli, Charlotte Hadjadj, Krystle Vera, Patrick Glennan, Viswanathan Shankar, Meng-Shiou Shieh, Kevin Yeung, Demmie Aguilar, Mohammad Ghalib, Imran Chaudhary, Radhashree Maitra, Eugenia Girda, Sanjay Goel
{"title":"Participation of Patients With Gynecologic Cancer in Phase I Clinical Trials: Experience From Two National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers.","authors":"Anusha Adkoli, Charlotte Hadjadj, Krystle Vera, Patrick Glennan, Viswanathan Shankar, Meng-Shiou Shieh, Kevin Yeung, Demmie Aguilar, Mohammad Ghalib, Imran Chaudhary, Radhashree Maitra, Eugenia Girda, Sanjay Goel","doi":"10.1200/OP-26-00217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Phase I trials are intended to define the safety of novel therapeutics, yet they offer alternative options long before they are approved. Limited data exist regarding access to and participation in phase I trials among gynecologic oncology patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, toxicities, and prognostic factors of phase I trials in advanced gynecologic malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with gynecologic malignancies enrolled in phase I clinical trials at two National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers between 2000 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and toxicity data were collected via chart review. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate prognostic factors, with multiple imputations for missing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 58.8 years (standard deviation, 11.5). Most were heavily pretreated with a median of three prior lines of therapy. The clinical benefit rate among response-evaluable patients was 56.2%, primarily driven by stable disease. The median OS was 1.16 years, with a significant improvement over time, favoring patients enrolled between 2015 and 2022, who had a median OS of 2.17 years (<i>P</i> < .0001). Non-Hispanic Black patients experienced a higher risk of mortality compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with only 3.9% experiencing dose-limiting toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phase I clinical trial participation in gynecologic cancers may provide clinically meaningful benefits, favorable toxicity profiles, and improved median OS over time. These findings support careful consideration of integrating phase I trials into treatment paradigms and highlight the ongoing necessity to address persistent disparities in trial enrollment and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2600217"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-26-00217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Phase I trials are intended to define the safety of novel therapeutics, yet they offer alternative options long before they are approved. Limited data exist regarding access to and participation in phase I trials among gynecologic oncology patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, toxicities, and prognostic factors of phase I trials in advanced gynecologic malignancies.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with gynecologic malignancies enrolled in phase I clinical trials at two National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers between 2000 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and toxicity data were collected via chart review. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate prognostic factors, with multiple imputations for missing data.

Results: Three hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 58.8 years (standard deviation, 11.5). Most were heavily pretreated with a median of three prior lines of therapy. The clinical benefit rate among response-evaluable patients was 56.2%, primarily driven by stable disease. The median OS was 1.16 years, with a significant improvement over time, favoring patients enrolled between 2015 and 2022, who had a median OS of 2.17 years (P < .0001). Non-Hispanic Black patients experienced a higher risk of mortality compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with only 3.9% experiencing dose-limiting toxicities.

Conclusion: Phase I clinical trial participation in gynecologic cancers may provide clinically meaningful benefits, favorable toxicity profiles, and improved median OS over time. These findings support careful consideration of integrating phase I trials into treatment paradigms and highlight the ongoing necessity to address persistent disparities in trial enrollment and outcomes.

妇科癌症患者参与一期临床试验:来自两个国家癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
518
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书