Participation of Patients With Gynecologic Cancer in Phase I Clinical Trials: Experience From Two National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers.
Anusha Adkoli, Charlotte Hadjadj, Krystle Vera, Patrick Glennan, Viswanathan Shankar, Meng-Shiou Shieh, Kevin Yeung, Demmie Aguilar, Mohammad Ghalib, Imran Chaudhary, Radhashree Maitra, Eugenia Girda, Sanjay Goel
{"title":"Participation of Patients With Gynecologic Cancer in Phase I Clinical Trials: Experience From Two National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers.","authors":"Anusha Adkoli, Charlotte Hadjadj, Krystle Vera, Patrick Glennan, Viswanathan Shankar, Meng-Shiou Shieh, Kevin Yeung, Demmie Aguilar, Mohammad Ghalib, Imran Chaudhary, Radhashree Maitra, Eugenia Girda, Sanjay Goel","doi":"10.1200/OP-26-00217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Phase I trials are intended to define the safety of novel therapeutics, yet they offer alternative options long before they are approved. Limited data exist regarding access to and participation in phase I trials among gynecologic oncology patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, toxicities, and prognostic factors of phase I trials in advanced gynecologic malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with gynecologic malignancies enrolled in phase I clinical trials at two National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers between 2000 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and toxicity data were collected via chart review. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate prognostic factors, with multiple imputations for missing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 58.8 years (standard deviation, 11.5). Most were heavily pretreated with a median of three prior lines of therapy. The clinical benefit rate among response-evaluable patients was 56.2%, primarily driven by stable disease. The median OS was 1.16 years, with a significant improvement over time, favoring patients enrolled between 2015 and 2022, who had a median OS of 2.17 years (<i>P</i> < .0001). Non-Hispanic Black patients experienced a higher risk of mortality compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with only 3.9% experiencing dose-limiting toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phase I clinical trial participation in gynecologic cancers may provide clinically meaningful benefits, favorable toxicity profiles, and improved median OS over time. These findings support careful consideration of integrating phase I trials into treatment paradigms and highlight the ongoing necessity to address persistent disparities in trial enrollment and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14612,"journal":{"name":"JCO oncology practice","volume":" ","pages":"OP2600217"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/OP-26-00217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Phase I trials are intended to define the safety of novel therapeutics, yet they offer alternative options long before they are approved. Limited data exist regarding access to and participation in phase I trials among gynecologic oncology patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, toxicities, and prognostic factors of phase I trials in advanced gynecologic malignancies.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with gynecologic malignancies enrolled in phase I clinical trials at two National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers between 2000 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and toxicity data were collected via chart review. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate prognostic factors, with multiple imputations for missing data.
Results: Three hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 58.8 years (standard deviation, 11.5). Most were heavily pretreated with a median of three prior lines of therapy. The clinical benefit rate among response-evaluable patients was 56.2%, primarily driven by stable disease. The median OS was 1.16 years, with a significant improvement over time, favoring patients enrolled between 2015 and 2022, who had a median OS of 2.17 years (P < .0001). Non-Hispanic Black patients experienced a higher risk of mortality compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with only 3.9% experiencing dose-limiting toxicities.
Conclusion: Phase I clinical trial participation in gynecologic cancers may provide clinically meaningful benefits, favorable toxicity profiles, and improved median OS over time. These findings support careful consideration of integrating phase I trials into treatment paradigms and highlight the ongoing necessity to address persistent disparities in trial enrollment and outcomes.