Comparative toxicity and efficacy of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy after first-line chemoimmunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: real-world retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Bing Bai, Yuhua Jiang, Hanqing Meng, Lei Song, Kai Wu, Jun Wei, Na Si
{"title":"Comparative toxicity and efficacy of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy after first-line chemoimmunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: real-world retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Bing Bai, Yuhua Jiang, Hanqing Meng, Lei Song, Kai Wu, Jun Wei, Na Si","doi":"10.1007/s00066-026-02583-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-line chemoimmunotherapy (CT-IT) is the standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), while consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) may improve local control and survival. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cTRT after first-line CT-IT in patients with ES-SCLC in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 199 patients with ES-SCLC who received first-line CT-IT. Patients were divided into a CT-IT + cTRT group (n = 97) and a CT-IT alone group (n = 102). Survival outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment-related adverse events were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups were generally comparable at baseline, although the CT-IT + cTRT group had fewer brain metastases and more favorable response-related features after induction treatment. Median PFS and OS were significantly longer in the CT-IT + cTRT group (both P < 0.001). cTRT (P < 0.001) and a longer duration of maintenance immunotherapy (P = 0.031) were independently associated with a better PFS. For OS, cTRT was associated with better survival status (P = 0.003) and liver metastasis with poorer survival status (P = 0.015). Regarding safety, grade 1-2 dermatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity were more frequent in the CT-IT + cTRT group, whereas rates of pneumonitis, esophagitis, immune-related adverse events, and grade 3-4 toxicities were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world retrospective cohort, the addition of cTRT to first-line CT-IT was associated with significantly improved PFS and OS in patients with ES-SCLC, without an apparent increase in severe treatment-related toxicity. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and refine patient selection for cTRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":21998,"journal":{"name":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strahlentherapie und Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-026-02583-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: First-line chemoimmunotherapy (CT-IT) is the standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), while consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) may improve local control and survival. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cTRT after first-line CT-IT in patients with ES-SCLC in a real-world setting.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 199 patients with ES-SCLC who received first-line CT-IT. Patients were divided into a CT-IT + cTRT group (n = 97) and a CT-IT alone group (n = 102). Survival outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Treatment-related adverse events were assessed.

Results: The two groups were generally comparable at baseline, although the CT-IT + cTRT group had fewer brain metastases and more favorable response-related features after induction treatment. Median PFS and OS were significantly longer in the CT-IT + cTRT group (both P < 0.001). cTRT (P < 0.001) and a longer duration of maintenance immunotherapy (P = 0.031) were independently associated with a better PFS. For OS, cTRT was associated with better survival status (P = 0.003) and liver metastasis with poorer survival status (P = 0.015). Regarding safety, grade 1-2 dermatitis and gastrointestinal toxicity were more frequent in the CT-IT + cTRT group, whereas rates of pneumonitis, esophagitis, immune-related adverse events, and grade 3-4 toxicities were comparable between groups.

Conclusion: In this real-world retrospective cohort, the addition of cTRT to first-line CT-IT was associated with significantly improved PFS and OS in patients with ES-SCLC, without an apparent increase in severe treatment-related toxicity. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and refine patient selection for cTRT.

广泛期小细胞肺癌一线化疗免疫治疗后胸部巩固放疗的比较毒性和疗效:现实世界回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.90%
发文量
141
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, published monthly, is a scientific journal that covers all aspects of oncology with focus on radiooncology, radiation biology and radiation physics. The articles are not only of interest to radiooncologists but to all physicians interested in oncology, to radiation biologists and radiation physicists. The journal publishes original articles, review articles and case studies that are peer-reviewed. It includes scientific short communications as well as a literature review with annotated articles that inform the reader on new developments in the various disciplines concerned and hence allow for a sound overview on the latest results in radiooncology research. Founded in 1912, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie is the oldest oncological journal in the world. Today, contributions are published in English and German. All articles have English summaries and legends. The journal is the official publication of several scientific radiooncological societies and publishes the relevant communications of these societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书