Long-term Survival of Endodontically Treated Cracked Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Chenglu Ruan, Lin Wang
{"title":"Long-term Survival of Endodontically Treated Cracked Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Chenglu Ruan, Lin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2026.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous meta-analyses of endodontically treated cracked teeth emphasized 1- to 5-year cohorts. New long-term data permit a time-anchored reassessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/Europe PMC, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception through October 3, 2026. Longitudinal cohorts of endodontically treated permanent cracked teeth with at least 1 year of follow-up were eligible. Tooth survival was the primary outcome. Two authors independently screened records, assessed full texts, and verified study-level data. Published 4- to 5-year proportions were synthesized on the logit scale using restricted maximum likelihood random effects and modified Knapp-Hartung inference. Longer horizons and prognostic factors were synthesized narratively. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-E-informed domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were included; 9 contributed to time-anchored quantitative synthesis. The pooled 4- to 5-year survival estimate was 82.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.7%-91.1%; I<sup>2</sup>=89.5%; 7 cohorts). Two independent cohorts reported 10-year survival of 54% and 66%; the latter Singapore cohort reported 55% at 15 years. Deep crack-associated probing was an established adverse marker across multiple cohorts. In the longest cohort, adjusted extraction hazards were 2.48 for 4- to 5-mm probing and 3.19 for probing of at least 6 mm. Radicular extension, periapical disease, multiple cracks, older age, and lack of definitive cuspal coverage were additional risk indicators. All studies were at serious risk of bias; certainty was very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selected endodontically treated cracked teeth frequently remain functional for 4 to 5 years, but survival declines thereafter and varies by setting. Prognosis should be time-dependent and individualized. Deep crack-associated probing is not a newly identified factor; this review quantifies its persistent long-term association with extraction and integrates it with radicular extension and restorative status.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2026.10.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Previous meta-analyses of endodontically treated cracked teeth emphasized 1- to 5-year cohorts. New long-term data permit a time-anchored reassessment.

Methods: PubMed/Europe PMC, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception through October 3, 2026. Longitudinal cohorts of endodontically treated permanent cracked teeth with at least 1 year of follow-up were eligible. Tooth survival was the primary outcome. Two authors independently screened records, assessed full texts, and verified study-level data. Published 4- to 5-year proportions were synthesized on the logit scale using restricted maximum likelihood random effects and modified Knapp-Hartung inference. Longer horizons and prognostic factors were synthesized narratively. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-E-informed domains.

Results: Fifteen studies were included; 9 contributed to time-anchored quantitative synthesis. The pooled 4- to 5-year survival estimate was 82.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.7%-91.1%; I2=89.5%; 7 cohorts). Two independent cohorts reported 10-year survival of 54% and 66%; the latter Singapore cohort reported 55% at 15 years. Deep crack-associated probing was an established adverse marker across multiple cohorts. In the longest cohort, adjusted extraction hazards were 2.48 for 4- to 5-mm probing and 3.19 for probing of at least 6 mm. Radicular extension, periapical disease, multiple cracks, older age, and lack of definitive cuspal coverage were additional risk indicators. All studies were at serious risk of bias; certainty was very low.

Conclusions: Selected endodontically treated cracked teeth frequently remain functional for 4 to 5 years, but survival declines thereafter and varies by setting. Prognosis should be time-dependent and individualized. Deep crack-associated probing is not a newly identified factor; this review quantifies its persistent long-term association with extraction and integrates it with radicular extension and restorative status.

牙髓治疗后裂牙的长期存活:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endodontics
Journal of endodontics 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书