{"title":"Long-term Survival of Endodontically Treated Cracked Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Chenglu Ruan, Lin Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.joen.2026.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous meta-analyses of endodontically treated cracked teeth emphasized 1- to 5-year cohorts. New long-term data permit a time-anchored reassessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed/Europe PMC, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception through October 3, 2026. Longitudinal cohorts of endodontically treated permanent cracked teeth with at least 1 year of follow-up were eligible. Tooth survival was the primary outcome. Two authors independently screened records, assessed full texts, and verified study-level data. Published 4- to 5-year proportions were synthesized on the logit scale using restricted maximum likelihood random effects and modified Knapp-Hartung inference. Longer horizons and prognostic factors were synthesized narratively. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-E-informed domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies were included; 9 contributed to time-anchored quantitative synthesis. The pooled 4- to 5-year survival estimate was 82.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.7%-91.1%; I<sup>2</sup>=89.5%; 7 cohorts). Two independent cohorts reported 10-year survival of 54% and 66%; the latter Singapore cohort reported 55% at 15 years. Deep crack-associated probing was an established adverse marker across multiple cohorts. In the longest cohort, adjusted extraction hazards were 2.48 for 4- to 5-mm probing and 3.19 for probing of at least 6 mm. Radicular extension, periapical disease, multiple cracks, older age, and lack of definitive cuspal coverage were additional risk indicators. All studies were at serious risk of bias; certainty was very low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Selected endodontically treated cracked teeth frequently remain functional for 4 to 5 years, but survival declines thereafter and varies by setting. Prognosis should be time-dependent and individualized. Deep crack-associated probing is not a newly identified factor; this review quantifies its persistent long-term association with extraction and integrates it with radicular extension and restorative status.</p>","PeriodicalId":15703,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endodontics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2026.10.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Previous meta-analyses of endodontically treated cracked teeth emphasized 1- to 5-year cohorts. New long-term data permit a time-anchored reassessment.
Methods: PubMed/Europe PMC, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception through October 3, 2026. Longitudinal cohorts of endodontically treated permanent cracked teeth with at least 1 year of follow-up were eligible. Tooth survival was the primary outcome. Two authors independently screened records, assessed full texts, and verified study-level data. Published 4- to 5-year proportions were synthesized on the logit scale using restricted maximum likelihood random effects and modified Knapp-Hartung inference. Longer horizons and prognostic factors were synthesized narratively. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-E-informed domains.
Results: Fifteen studies were included; 9 contributed to time-anchored quantitative synthesis. The pooled 4- to 5-year survival estimate was 82.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.7%-91.1%; I2=89.5%; 7 cohorts). Two independent cohorts reported 10-year survival of 54% and 66%; the latter Singapore cohort reported 55% at 15 years. Deep crack-associated probing was an established adverse marker across multiple cohorts. In the longest cohort, adjusted extraction hazards were 2.48 for 4- to 5-mm probing and 3.19 for probing of at least 6 mm. Radicular extension, periapical disease, multiple cracks, older age, and lack of definitive cuspal coverage were additional risk indicators. All studies were at serious risk of bias; certainty was very low.
Conclusions: Selected endodontically treated cracked teeth frequently remain functional for 4 to 5 years, but survival declines thereafter and varies by setting. Prognosis should be time-dependent and individualized. Deep crack-associated probing is not a newly identified factor; this review quantifies its persistent long-term association with extraction and integrates it with radicular extension and restorative status.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Endodontics, the official journal of the American Association of Endodontists, publishes scientific articles, case reports and comparison studies evaluating materials and methods of pulp conservation and endodontic treatment. Endodontists and general dentists can learn about new concepts in root canal treatment and the latest advances in techniques and instrumentation in the one journal that helps them keep pace with rapid changes in this field.