Comparing geospatial interpolation techniques for estimating ambient PM2.5 mass concentrations from sugarcane burning in South Florida.

Anne Mielnik, Olivia Sablan, Jeffrey R Pierce, Lilah M Besser, Juyoung Park, Diana Mitsova, Diane Cook, Sherry WeMott, Christine L Williams, Lisa A K Wiese, Sheryl Magzamen
{"title":"Comparing geospatial interpolation techniques for estimating ambient PM2.5 mass concentrations from sugarcane burning in South Florida.","authors":"Anne Mielnik, Olivia Sablan, Jeffrey R Pierce, Lilah M Besser, Juyoung Park, Diana Mitsova, Diane Cook, Sherry WeMott, Christine L Williams, Lisa A K Wiese, Sheryl Magzamen","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-10743669/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few studies quantify air pollutant exposures from agricultural burning - a potentially significant source of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in rural regions - due to sparse air quality monitoring outside of urban areas. Using a dense network of low-cost sensors, we evaluated several interpolation-based approaches (e.g., inverse distance weighting and kriging) to estimate 24-hour average PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposures from sugarcane burning in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) for future regional health studies. Measurements were taken at 46 unique locations from June 8th, 2024, to December 1st, 2025, capturing the EAA's burn and non-burn seasons. Model performance was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation and overall, varied by model and fit, meteorological season, and the presence of smoke, with R<sup>2</sup> values ranging from 0 to 0.99. Based on the placement of sensors and number of measurements each day, inverse distance weighting models performed best - maintaining the highest R<sup>2</sup> and the lowest root mean squared error and mean absolute error values for the most days. However, combining approaches, choosing the \"best\" model each day, provided the most robust exposure estimates for future studies. Independent of interpolation technique, estimated PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations were highest in the presence of sugarcane burning smoke, increasing 1.65 μg/m<sup>3</sup> (standard error = 0.13 μg/m<sup>3</sup>), and were localized inland, near sugarcane burning regions and the EAA. Notably, PM<sub>2.5</sub> was lowest along the coast - highlighting air quality disparities in South Florida.</p>","PeriodicalId":519972,"journal":{"name":"Research square","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13648834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10743669/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few studies quantify air pollutant exposures from agricultural burning - a potentially significant source of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in rural regions - due to sparse air quality monitoring outside of urban areas. Using a dense network of low-cost sensors, we evaluated several interpolation-based approaches (e.g., inverse distance weighting and kriging) to estimate 24-hour average PM2.5 exposures from sugarcane burning in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) for future regional health studies. Measurements were taken at 46 unique locations from June 8th, 2024, to December 1st, 2025, capturing the EAA's burn and non-burn seasons. Model performance was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation and overall, varied by model and fit, meteorological season, and the presence of smoke, with R2 values ranging from 0 to 0.99. Based on the placement of sensors and number of measurements each day, inverse distance weighting models performed best - maintaining the highest R2 and the lowest root mean squared error and mean absolute error values for the most days. However, combining approaches, choosing the "best" model each day, provided the most robust exposure estimates for future studies. Independent of interpolation technique, estimated PM2.5 mass concentrations were highest in the presence of sugarcane burning smoke, increasing 1.65 μg/m3 (standard error = 0.13 μg/m3), and were localized inland, near sugarcane burning regions and the EAA. Notably, PM2.5 was lowest along the coast - highlighting air quality disparities in South Florida.

比较估算南佛罗里达州甘蔗燃烧产生的环境PM2.5质量浓度的地理空间插值技术。
由于城市地区以外的空气质量监测较少,很少有研究对农业燃烧产生的空气污染物进行量化,而农业燃烧是农村地区细颗粒物(PM 2.5)的潜在重要来源。使用密集的低成本传感器网络,我们评估了几种基于插值的方法(例如,反向距离加权和克里格法),以估计Everglades农业区(EAA)甘蔗燃烧产生的24小时平均PM 2.5暴露量,用于未来的区域健康研究。从2024年6月8日到2025年12月1日,在46个不同的地点进行了测量,记录了EAA的燃烧季节和非燃烧季节。使用留一交叉验证对模型性能进行评估,总体而言,模型性能随模型和拟合、气象季节和烟雾的存在而变化,r2值范围为0至0.99。根据传感器的位置和每天的测量次数,反向距离加权模型表现最好——在大多数日子里保持最高的r2和最低的均方根误差和平均绝对误差值。然而,结合各种方法,每天选择“最佳”模型,为未来的研究提供了最可靠的暴露估计。与插值技术无关,估计的pm2.5质量浓度在甘蔗燃烧烟雾存在时最高,增加1.65µg/m 3(标准误差= 0.13µg/m 3),并且位于内陆,靠近甘蔗燃烧区域和EAA。值得注意的是,沿海地区的pm2.5最低,这凸显了南佛罗里达州的空气质量差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书