Exploring Maximality Criteria of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Practical Clinical Framework.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respiration Pub Date : 2026-10-10 DOI:10.1159/res/aepag004
Michaël Staes, Iwein Gyselinck, Maud Lormans, Marieke Wuyts, Thierry Troosters, Maarten De Vos, Wim Janssens
{"title":"Exploring Maximality Criteria of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Practical Clinical Framework.","authors":"Michaël Staes, Iwein Gyselinck, Maud Lormans, Marieke Wuyts, Thierry Troosters, Maarten De Vos, Wim Janssens","doi":"10.1159/res/aepag004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used to assess exercise capacity and identify mechanisms of exercise limitation. Identification of test maximality is essential for correct interpretation, yet no consensus exists on the defining criteria. This study evaluated the performance of different <mml:math id=\"m1\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> plateau definitions and the contribution of secondary maximality criteria in patients with chronic respiratory disease and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 395 CPETs (84 healthy, 135 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 99 interstitial lung disease, 77 pulmonary hypertension), comparing consensus-based visual identification of a <mml:math id=\"m2\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> plateau by three pulmonologists with three commonly used plateau definitions. Additionally, five secondary maximality criteria were evaluated, using strict and liberal thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative <mml:math id=\"m3\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> plateau definition showed strong agreement with visual assessment (κ = 0.75-0.93), while absolute thresholds were discordant (κ = 0.02-0.31). Overlap between maximality criteria was high in healthy individuals but low in disease groups, suggesting that evaluating multiple criteria in parallel is necessary. However, combining more than 2 secondary criteria in healthy subjects and more than 3 in patients on top of <mml:math id=\"m4\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> plateau provided minimal additive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPET maximality assessment depends strongly on the criteria applied, potentially altering CPET interpretation and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13688374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/res/aepag004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used to assess exercise capacity and identify mechanisms of exercise limitation. Identification of test maximality is essential for correct interpretation, yet no consensus exists on the defining criteria. This study evaluated the performance of different V˙O2 plateau definitions and the contribution of secondary maximality criteria in patients with chronic respiratory disease and healthy controls.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 395 CPETs (84 healthy, 135 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 99 interstitial lung disease, 77 pulmonary hypertension), comparing consensus-based visual identification of a V˙O2 plateau by three pulmonologists with three commonly used plateau definitions. Additionally, five secondary maximality criteria were evaluated, using strict and liberal thresholds.

Results: The relative V˙O2 plateau definition showed strong agreement with visual assessment (κ = 0.75-0.93), while absolute thresholds were discordant (κ = 0.02-0.31). Overlap between maximality criteria was high in healthy individuals but low in disease groups, suggesting that evaluating multiple criteria in parallel is necessary. However, combining more than 2 secondary criteria in healthy subjects and more than 3 in patients on top of V˙O2 plateau provided minimal additive value.

Conclusion: CPET maximality assessment depends strongly on the criteria applied, potentially altering CPET interpretation and clinical decision-making.

探索健康受试者和慢性呼吸系统疾病患者心肺运动试验的最大值标准:一个实用的临床框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书