Exploring Maximality Criteria of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Practical Clinical Framework.
{"title":"Exploring Maximality Criteria of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Practical Clinical Framework.","authors":"Michaël Staes, Iwein Gyselinck, Maud Lormans, Marieke Wuyts, Thierry Troosters, Maarten De Vos, Wim Janssens","doi":"10.1159/res/aepag004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used to assess exercise capacity and identify mechanisms of exercise limitation. Identification of test maximality is essential for correct interpretation, yet no consensus exists on the defining criteria. This study evaluated the performance of different <mml:math id=\"m1\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> plateau definitions and the contribution of secondary maximality criteria in patients with chronic respiratory disease and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 395 CPETs (84 healthy, 135 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 99 interstitial lung disease, 77 pulmonary hypertension), comparing consensus-based visual identification of a <mml:math id=\"m2\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> plateau by three pulmonologists with three commonly used plateau definitions. Additionally, five secondary maximality criteria were evaluated, using strict and liberal thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative <mml:math id=\"m3\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> plateau definition showed strong agreement with visual assessment (κ = 0.75-0.93), while absolute thresholds were discordant (κ = 0.02-0.31). Overlap between maximality criteria was high in healthy individuals but low in disease groups, suggesting that evaluating multiple criteria in parallel is necessary. However, combining more than 2 secondary criteria in healthy subjects and more than 3 in patients on top of <mml:math id=\"m4\" xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent=\"true\"><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">V</mml:mi><mml:mo>˙</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant=\"normal\">O</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> plateau provided minimal additive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPET maximality assessment depends strongly on the criteria applied, potentially altering CPET interpretation and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13688374/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/res/aepag004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used to assess exercise capacity and identify mechanisms of exercise limitation. Identification of test maximality is essential for correct interpretation, yet no consensus exists on the defining criteria. This study evaluated the performance of different V˙O2 plateau definitions and the contribution of secondary maximality criteria in patients with chronic respiratory disease and healthy controls.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 395 CPETs (84 healthy, 135 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 99 interstitial lung disease, 77 pulmonary hypertension), comparing consensus-based visual identification of a V˙O2 plateau by three pulmonologists with three commonly used plateau definitions. Additionally, five secondary maximality criteria were evaluated, using strict and liberal thresholds.
Results: The relative V˙O2 plateau definition showed strong agreement with visual assessment (κ = 0.75-0.93), while absolute thresholds were discordant (κ = 0.02-0.31). Overlap between maximality criteria was high in healthy individuals but low in disease groups, suggesting that evaluating multiple criteria in parallel is necessary. However, combining more than 2 secondary criteria in healthy subjects and more than 3 in patients on top of V˙O2 plateau provided minimal additive value.
Conclusion: CPET maximality assessment depends strongly on the criteria applied, potentially altering CPET interpretation and clinical decision-making.
期刊介绍:
''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.