Predicting PANSS symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders using speech only: an international, multi-centre, computational secondary analysis across multiple languages.
Rui He, Maryia Kirdun, Claudio Palominos, Lara Navarrete Orejudo, Sophie Barthelemy, Simran Bhola, Silvia Ciampelli, Amandine Decker, Cemal Demirlek, Riccardo Fusaroli, José Tomás García-Molina, Guy Gimenez, Roya Hüppi, Katja Koelkebeck, Amandine Lecomte, Renxiang Qiu, Arndis Simonsen, Vincent Tourneur, Burcu Verim, Huiling Wang, Berna Yalincetin, Sandy Yin, Yuan Zhou, Maxime Amblard, Rosa Ayesa Arriola, Emre Bora, Janna de Boer, Alicia I Figueroa-Barra, Sanne Koops, Michel Musiol, Lena Palaniyappan, Alberto Parola, Filip Spaniel, Sunny X Tang, Iris E Sommer, Philipp Homan, Wolfram Hinzen
{"title":"Predicting PANSS symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders using speech only: an international, multi-centre, computational secondary analysis across multiple languages.","authors":"Rui He, Maryia Kirdun, Claudio Palominos, Lara Navarrete Orejudo, Sophie Barthelemy, Simran Bhola, Silvia Ciampelli, Amandine Decker, Cemal Demirlek, Riccardo Fusaroli, José Tomás García-Molina, Guy Gimenez, Roya Hüppi, Katja Koelkebeck, Amandine Lecomte, Renxiang Qiu, Arndis Simonsen, Vincent Tourneur, Burcu Verim, Huiling Wang, Berna Yalincetin, Sandy Yin, Yuan Zhou, Maxime Amblard, Rosa Ayesa Arriola, Emre Bora, Janna de Boer, Alicia I Figueroa-Barra, Sanne Koops, Michel Musiol, Lena Palaniyappan, Alberto Parola, Filip Spaniel, Sunny X Tang, Iris E Sommer, Philipp Homan, Wolfram Hinzen","doi":"10.64898/2026.02.20.26345632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Speech carries cues to variation in mental state in schizophrenia, typically indexed with clinician-rated scales such as Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). In this study, we aggregate multi-centre recordings to assemble a large corpus and assess symptom-prediction models at scale, to enable rater-independent, efficient, and reproducible assessments for early detection of relapse-related signals from speech.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this computational secondary analysis, we compiled data from 453 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, recruited between 2005 and 2026 from ten global sites in the Czech Republic, United States, Spain, Chile, France, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Türkiye, Germany, and China, and clipped their speech recordings into 6,664 segments. Across three featuresets, acoustic-prosodic profile, pretrained multilingual embeddings, and their concatenation, we compared 16 algorithms in separate item-specific models to predict eight relapse-related PANSS items, including three positive (P1, P2, P3), three negative (N1, N4, N6), and two general (G5, G9) items, on speaker-disjoint splits. Performance was assessed by root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) at both segment and participant (median-aggregation) levels. Best model per item underwent bias checks for age, sex, education, and symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Best-performing models predicted symptoms with prediction errors of 1·5 or lower: P1 1·544/1·527, P2 1·318/1·107, P3 1·487/1·542, N1 1·071/1·030, N4 1·521/1·430, N6 0·869/0·855, G5 0·951/0·882, G9 1·298/1·282 (segment/participant). Performance of pretrained embeddings surpassed acoustic-prosodic features and concatenation. Results were comparable in languages or language variants with fewer available speech and language computational resources. We found no bias by age, sex, or education, aside from reduced N4 accuracy in males; but performance degraded with higher symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Speech can support automatic assessment of schizophrenia symptoms using pretrained embeddings, even without transcripts. Such models show promise as clinically meaningful, efficient, and low-burden tools for real-time monitoring of symptom trajectories. Future work should validate these models prospectively in higher-severity samples and improve clinical interpretability.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13648677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.20.26345632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Speech carries cues to variation in mental state in schizophrenia, typically indexed with clinician-rated scales such as Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). In this study, we aggregate multi-centre recordings to assemble a large corpus and assess symptom-prediction models at scale, to enable rater-independent, efficient, and reproducible assessments for early detection of relapse-related signals from speech.
Methods: In this computational secondary analysis, we compiled data from 453 patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, recruited between 2005 and 2026 from ten global sites in the Czech Republic, United States, Spain, Chile, France, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Türkiye, Germany, and China, and clipped their speech recordings into 6,664 segments. Across three featuresets, acoustic-prosodic profile, pretrained multilingual embeddings, and their concatenation, we compared 16 algorithms in separate item-specific models to predict eight relapse-related PANSS items, including three positive (P1, P2, P3), three negative (N1, N4, N6), and two general (G5, G9) items, on speaker-disjoint splits. Performance was assessed by root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) at both segment and participant (median-aggregation) levels. Best model per item underwent bias checks for age, sex, education, and symptom severity.
Findings: Best-performing models predicted symptoms with prediction errors of 1·5 or lower: P1 1·544/1·527, P2 1·318/1·107, P3 1·487/1·542, N1 1·071/1·030, N4 1·521/1·430, N6 0·869/0·855, G5 0·951/0·882, G9 1·298/1·282 (segment/participant). Performance of pretrained embeddings surpassed acoustic-prosodic features and concatenation. Results were comparable in languages or language variants with fewer available speech and language computational resources. We found no bias by age, sex, or education, aside from reduced N4 accuracy in males; but performance degraded with higher symptom severity.
Interpretation: Speech can support automatic assessment of schizophrenia symptoms using pretrained embeddings, even without transcripts. Such models show promise as clinically meaningful, efficient, and low-burden tools for real-time monitoring of symptom trajectories. Future work should validate these models prospectively in higher-severity samples and improve clinical interpretability.