Jannik Ketschau, Jonathan Mohr, Yannik Leonhardt, Alex Grabenhorst, Hannes Singer, Helena Kram, Nils Krautkremer, Minli Niu, Katharina Pippich, Klaus-Dietrich Wolff, Lucas M Ritschl
{"title":"Selective preoperative lower extremity computed tomography angiography before mandibular reconstruction: Identifying patients unlikely to require fibula free flap reconstruction.","authors":"Jannik Ketschau, Jonathan Mohr, Yannik Leonhardt, Alex Grabenhorst, Hannes Singer, Helena Kram, Nils Krautkremer, Minli Niu, Katharina Pippich, Klaus-Dietrich Wolff, Lucas M Ritschl","doi":"10.1007/s10006-026-01646-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Not every patient undergoing mandibular continuity resection requires free fibula flap (FFF) reconstruction. Whether clinical judgment reliably identifies patients unlikely to benefit from preoperative lower-extremity computed tomography angiography (CTA) remains unknown, despite the relevance of this question for cost-conscious and resource-efficient imaging strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective outcome-based validation was conducted in patients undergoing mandibular continuity resection between July 2012 and June 2023. The primary outcome was secondary FFF reconstruction among patients not initially selected for CTA. Factors associated with CTA utilization were assessed by multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>316 consecutively operated patients were included. Prior radiotherapy (OR 2.67, p = 0.005) and smoking history (OR 1.98, p = 0.032) were independently associated with CTA utilization. Among 111 patients without primary FFF reconstruction, four (3.6%) required secondary FFF reconstruction, all of whom had undergone CTA. No patient managed without CTA subsequently required FFF reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this cohort, clinical judgment was associated with successful identification of patients who did not subsequently require fibular reconstruction. Omission of CTA in carefully selected patients was not associated with subsequent reconstructive deficiency, though larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658326/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-026-01646-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Not every patient undergoing mandibular continuity resection requires free fibula flap (FFF) reconstruction. Whether clinical judgment reliably identifies patients unlikely to benefit from preoperative lower-extremity computed tomography angiography (CTA) remains unknown, despite the relevance of this question for cost-conscious and resource-efficient imaging strategies.
Methods: A retrospective outcome-based validation was conducted in patients undergoing mandibular continuity resection between July 2012 and June 2023. The primary outcome was secondary FFF reconstruction among patients not initially selected for CTA. Factors associated with CTA utilization were assessed by multivariable logistic regression.
Results: 316 consecutively operated patients were included. Prior radiotherapy (OR 2.67, p = 0.005) and smoking history (OR 1.98, p = 0.032) were independently associated with CTA utilization. Among 111 patients without primary FFF reconstruction, four (3.6%) required secondary FFF reconstruction, all of whom had undergone CTA. No patient managed without CTA subsequently required FFF reconstruction.
Conclusions: In this cohort, clinical judgment was associated with successful identification of patients who did not subsequently require fibular reconstruction. Omission of CTA in carefully selected patients was not associated with subsequent reconstructive deficiency, though larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
目的:并非所有接受下颌骨连续性切除术的患者都需要游离腓骨瓣(FFF)重建。临床判断是否可靠地识别不可能从术前下肢计算机断层血管造影(CTA)中获益的患者仍然未知,尽管这个问题与成本意识和资源效率成像策略相关。方法:对2012年7月至2023年6月接受下颌连续性切除术的患者进行回顾性结果验证。主要结果是在最初没有选择CTA的患者中继发性FFF重建。采用多变量logistic回归评估与CTA使用相关的因素。结果:共纳入316例连续手术患者。既往放疗(OR 2.67, p = 0.005)和吸烟史(OR 1.98, p = 0.032)与CTA使用独立相关。在111例无原发性FFF重建的患者中,4例(3.6%)需要二次FFF重建,所有患者均接受了CTA。在没有CTA的情况下,没有患者随后需要FFF重建。结论:在该队列中,临床判断与成功识别随后不需要腓骨重建的患者相关。在精心挑选的患者中,遗漏CTA与随后的重建缺陷无关,尽管需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。