Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Sensory Arousal Nursing for Post-Stroke Dysphagia.

IF 1.2 4区 综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Chunling Hu, Ling Liu, Shanhua Mao, Meihong Ming, Min Chen, Zhuang Yue
{"title":"Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Sensory Arousal Nursing for Post-Stroke Dysphagia.","authors":"Chunling Hu, Ling Liu, Shanhua Mao, Meihong Ming, Min Chen, Zhuang Yue","doi":"10.3791/72231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-stroke dysphagia can compromise airway protection, nutrition, and functional recovery. This article describes a clinical protocol combining low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with a structured sensory arousal nursing package for patients with acute ischemic stroke and dysphagia accompanied by feeding-related upper-limb dysfunction. Dysphagia is the primary treatment focus; upper-limb activities address associated limitations in self-feeding. The protocol integrates screening, stimulation safety review, motor-threshold determination, contralesional swallowing-motor targeting, 1 Hz rTMS, sequenced sensory input, feeding-related task practice, and outcome assessment. Representative results come from a single-center, randomized, assessor-blinded study of 160 patients (80 per group) comparing the combined intervention with routine nursing for swallowing rehabilitation over 2 weeks. The between-group difference in Standardized Swallowing Assessment change was -3.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.8 to -2.0; p < 0.001). The between-group change-score differences were 0.8 levels for the Functional Oral Intake Scale (95% CI, 0.4 to 1.2; p < 0.001) and -0.9 points for the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (95% CI, -1.5 to -0.3; p = 0.004), the latter restricted to participants with paired instrumental assessments (48 versus 46). Aspiration pneumonia occurred in 5/80 versus 11/80 participants (p = 0.118); no serious rTMS-related adverse events were reported. These findings indicate short-term differences in scale scores but do not establish a clinically important benefit in swallowing or a reduced risk of pneumonia. The protocol coordinates established rehabilitation components. Further studies are needed to determine their individual effects and identify patients who may benefit from contralesional inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":48787,"journal":{"name":"Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments","volume":" 236","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3791/72231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-stroke dysphagia can compromise airway protection, nutrition, and functional recovery. This article describes a clinical protocol combining low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with a structured sensory arousal nursing package for patients with acute ischemic stroke and dysphagia accompanied by feeding-related upper-limb dysfunction. Dysphagia is the primary treatment focus; upper-limb activities address associated limitations in self-feeding. The protocol integrates screening, stimulation safety review, motor-threshold determination, contralesional swallowing-motor targeting, 1 Hz rTMS, sequenced sensory input, feeding-related task practice, and outcome assessment. Representative results come from a single-center, randomized, assessor-blinded study of 160 patients (80 per group) comparing the combined intervention with routine nursing for swallowing rehabilitation over 2 weeks. The between-group difference in Standardized Swallowing Assessment change was -3.9 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.8 to -2.0; p < 0.001). The between-group change-score differences were 0.8 levels for the Functional Oral Intake Scale (95% CI, 0.4 to 1.2; p < 0.001) and -0.9 points for the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (95% CI, -1.5 to -0.3; p = 0.004), the latter restricted to participants with paired instrumental assessments (48 versus 46). Aspiration pneumonia occurred in 5/80 versus 11/80 participants (p = 0.118); no serious rTMS-related adverse events were reported. These findings indicate short-term differences in scale scores but do not establish a clinically important benefit in swallowing or a reduced risk of pneumonia. The protocol coordinates established rehabilitation components. Further studies are needed to determine their individual effects and identify patients who may benefit from contralesional inhibition.

低频重复经颅磁刺激加感觉唤醒对脑卒中后吞咽困难的护理。
卒中后吞咽困难会损害气道保护、营养和功能恢复。本文介绍了一种将低频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)与结构化感觉唤醒护理包相结合的临床方案,用于急性缺血性卒中和吞咽困难伴进食相关上肢功能障碍患者。吞咽困难是主要的治疗重点;上肢活动解决了自我进食的相关限制。该方案整合了筛选、刺激安全性审查、运动阈值确定、对照吞咽运动靶向、1hz rTMS、顺序感觉输入、喂食相关任务实践和结果评估。代表性的结果来自一项单中心、随机、评估盲研究,160例患者(每组80例)在2周内比较了联合干预和常规护理对吞咽康复的影响。标准化吞咽评估变化组间差异为-3.9点(95%可信区间[CI], -5.8 ~ -2.0; p < 0.001)。功能性口服摄入量表的组间变化评分差异为0.8分(95% CI, 0.4 - 1.2; p < 0.001),穿透-吸入量表的组间变化评分差异为-0.9分(95% CI, -1.5 - -0.3; p = 0.004),后者仅限于使用配对工具评估的参与者(48对46)。吸入性肺炎发生率为5/80 vs 11/80 (p = 0.118);未见严重rtms相关不良事件的报道。这些发现表明了量表评分的短期差异,但没有在吞咽或降低肺炎风险方面建立临床重要的益处。该议定书协调了既定的康复组成部分。需要进一步的研究来确定它们的个体效应,并确定可能受益于对侧抑制的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments
Jove-Journal of Visualized Experiments MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
992
期刊介绍: JoVE, the Journal of Visualized Experiments, is the world''s first peer reviewed scientific video journal. Established in 2006, JoVE is devoted to publishing scientific research in a visual format to help researchers overcome two of the biggest challenges facing the scientific research community today; poor reproducibility and the time and labor intensive nature of learning new experimental techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书