Diffusion and geographic variation in robot-assisted colon resection after reimbursement in Japan: a nationwide billing-based analysis, 2022-2024.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Takuya Omura, Takahiro Kamihara
{"title":"Diffusion and geographic variation in robot-assisted colon resection after reimbursement in Japan: a nationwide billing-based analysis, 2022-2024.","authors":"Takuya Omura, Takahiro Kamihara","doi":"10.1007/s11701-026-04039-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to quantify how rapidly robot-assisted colon resection billing diffused after reimbursement in Japan and whether geographic variation narrowed as uptake expanded. We analyzed National Database (NDB) Open Data for fiscal years (FYs) 2022-2024. The primary outcome was the robot-assisted share of two laparoscopic billing categories for malignant colon tumor resection (robot-assisted and conventional). Variation across treating-institution prefectures was summarized using the interquartile range (IQR) for absolute spread and the coefficient of variation (CV) and Gini coefficient for relative dispersion. Longitudinal analyses included prefectures with unmasked values in all relevant years; FY2024 permitted a complete 47-prefecture cross-section. The national robot-assisted share rose from 3.38% in FY2022 to 11.40% in FY2023 and 19.55% in FY2024. In the common 33-prefecture panel, the IQR widened from 5.73 to 6.61 and 11.79 percentage points, whereas the CV fell from 1.086 to 0.630 and 0.482 and the Gini coefficient from 0.565 to 0.347 and 0.269. Across all 47 prefectures in FY2024, shares ranged from 0.00% to 41.47%; the complete cross-section was more heterogeneous than the restricted longitudinal panel, and the 14 prefectures excluded because of earlier masking had a lower median share (6.83% versus 18.05%). Rapid national growth did not translate into geographically uniform billing-based uptake. Relative dispersion decreased while absolute percentage-point spread widened, so apparent geographic convergence depended on the scale used. Post-reimbursement surveillance should report both dimensions and account for selection introduced by disclosure-related masking.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-026-04039-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to quantify how rapidly robot-assisted colon resection billing diffused after reimbursement in Japan and whether geographic variation narrowed as uptake expanded. We analyzed National Database (NDB) Open Data for fiscal years (FYs) 2022-2024. The primary outcome was the robot-assisted share of two laparoscopic billing categories for malignant colon tumor resection (robot-assisted and conventional). Variation across treating-institution prefectures was summarized using the interquartile range (IQR) for absolute spread and the coefficient of variation (CV) and Gini coefficient for relative dispersion. Longitudinal analyses included prefectures with unmasked values in all relevant years; FY2024 permitted a complete 47-prefecture cross-section. The national robot-assisted share rose from 3.38% in FY2022 to 11.40% in FY2023 and 19.55% in FY2024. In the common 33-prefecture panel, the IQR widened from 5.73 to 6.61 and 11.79 percentage points, whereas the CV fell from 1.086 to 0.630 and 0.482 and the Gini coefficient from 0.565 to 0.347 and 0.269. Across all 47 prefectures in FY2024, shares ranged from 0.00% to 41.47%; the complete cross-section was more heterogeneous than the restricted longitudinal panel, and the 14 prefectures excluded because of earlier masking had a lower median share (6.83% versus 18.05%). Rapid national growth did not translate into geographically uniform billing-based uptake. Relative dispersion decreased while absolute percentage-point spread widened, so apparent geographic convergence depended on the scale used. Post-reimbursement surveillance should report both dimensions and account for selection introduced by disclosure-related masking.

日本机器人辅助结肠切除术报销后的扩散和地理差异:一项全国性的基于计费的分析,2022-2024
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书