[Varicocele: comparison of minimally invasive treatment options : Endovascular embolization, microsurgery, and patient-tailored treatment selection].

IF 0.6
Michael Christian Doppler, Michael Brönnimann, Matthias Jung, Wibke Uller, Elif Can
{"title":"[Varicocele: comparison of minimally invasive treatment options : Endovascular embolization, microsurgery, and patient-tailored treatment selection].","authors":"Michael Christian Doppler, Michael Brönnimann, Matthias Jung, Wibke Uller, Elif Can","doi":"10.1007/s00117-026-01673-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Varicocele is the most common potentially treatable cause of male subfertility. Endovascular embolization is an established minimally invasive alternative to microsurgical ligation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To place the indications, technique, outcomes, and limitations of varicocele embolization in context and to define its role relative to microsurgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Narrative, guideline- and evidence-based review of current WHO, EAU, AUA/ASRM, and CIRSE recommendations, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant cohort studies published through July 2026.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment is primarily indicated in men with a palpable varicocele, abnormal semen parameters, and otherwise unexplained infertility; subclinical varicoceles and normal semen analyses do not justify intervention. Technical success of embolization is usually above 90% in experienced centers. Pregnancy rates are broadly similar to those after surgery, while overall morbidity tends to be lower. Recurrence may, however, be more frequent than after high ligation. No embolic agent has proved consistently superior.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Varicocele embolization is an evidence-based alternative to surgery, particularly for recurrent disease, bilateral or complex venous anatomy, and when rapid recovery is a priority. Treatment should be selected through multidisciplinary, anatomy-based, and shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":74635,"journal":{"name":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-026-01673-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Varicocele is the most common potentially treatable cause of male subfertility. Endovascular embolization is an established minimally invasive alternative to microsurgical ligation.

Objective: To place the indications, technique, outcomes, and limitations of varicocele embolization in context and to define its role relative to microsurgery.

Materials and methods: Narrative, guideline- and evidence-based review of current WHO, EAU, AUA/ASRM, and CIRSE recommendations, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant cohort studies published through July 2026.

Results: Treatment is primarily indicated in men with a palpable varicocele, abnormal semen parameters, and otherwise unexplained infertility; subclinical varicoceles and normal semen analyses do not justify intervention. Technical success of embolization is usually above 90% in experienced centers. Pregnancy rates are broadly similar to those after surgery, while overall morbidity tends to be lower. Recurrence may, however, be more frequent than after high ligation. No embolic agent has proved consistently superior.

Conclusion: Varicocele embolization is an evidence-based alternative to surgery, particularly for recurrent disease, bilateral or complex venous anatomy, and when rapid recovery is a priority. Treatment should be selected through multidisciplinary, anatomy-based, and shared decision-making.

[精索静脉曲张:微创治疗方案的比较:血管内栓塞、显微手术和患者定制治疗选择]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书