Establishing stone composition from pure dust: feasibility and analytic yield of FTIR spectroscopy during suction-assisted flexible ureteroscopy.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sarwar Noori Mahmood, Ahmed Sarwar Noori, Arya Sarwar Noori, Hanisk Mohammed Othman
{"title":"Establishing stone composition from pure dust: feasibility and analytic yield of FTIR spectroscopy during suction-assisted flexible ureteroscopy.","authors":"Sarwar Noori Mahmood, Ahmed Sarwar Noori, Arya Sarwar Noori, Hanisk Mohammed Othman","doi":"10.1007/s00240-026-02076-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The shift toward dust-only flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) prevents routine metabolic stone analysis due to a lack of retrievable fragments. We evaluated the technical success, analytical yield, and composition profile of Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy performed on stone dust collected via flexible navigable suction access sheaths (FANS). This prospective single-center study included 109 patients undergoing FURS with FANS for upper tract stone disease. The surgeon aspirated the stone dust slurry into a container. Then, the fluid samples collected were sent to the lab to be centrifuged, washed with distilled water to remove any blood/protein artifacts, incubated until dried, and analyzed using FTIR spectroscopy. Dust aspiration reached a 100% analytical yield (109/109 cases), with all samples giving an interpretable FTIR reading. Calcium-based stones were the most common (64.2%, n = 70), consisting of Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate (51.4%, n = 56) and Calcium Oxalate Dihydrate (12.8%, n = 14). Uric Acid was identified in 26 cases (23.9%), followed by Carbonate-Apatite (6.4%, n = 7), Cystine (3.7%, n = 4), and Struvite (1.8%, n = 2). There was a strong relation between pre-operative CT density and the primary dust component (p < 0.001), with Uric Acid stones displaying significantly lower density (611.8 ± 263.2 HU) than Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate (1146.7 ± 335.7 HU). Aspirating stone dust during FURS provides a viable sample for FTIR spectroscopy, challenging the assumption that dust-only lithotripsy is inadequate for stone analysis and demonstrating a feasible, high-yield alternative when solid fragments are unretrievable.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-026-02076-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The shift toward dust-only flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) prevents routine metabolic stone analysis due to a lack of retrievable fragments. We evaluated the technical success, analytical yield, and composition profile of Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy performed on stone dust collected via flexible navigable suction access sheaths (FANS). This prospective single-center study included 109 patients undergoing FURS with FANS for upper tract stone disease. The surgeon aspirated the stone dust slurry into a container. Then, the fluid samples collected were sent to the lab to be centrifuged, washed with distilled water to remove any blood/protein artifacts, incubated until dried, and analyzed using FTIR spectroscopy. Dust aspiration reached a 100% analytical yield (109/109 cases), with all samples giving an interpretable FTIR reading. Calcium-based stones were the most common (64.2%, n = 70), consisting of Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate (51.4%, n = 56) and Calcium Oxalate Dihydrate (12.8%, n = 14). Uric Acid was identified in 26 cases (23.9%), followed by Carbonate-Apatite (6.4%, n = 7), Cystine (3.7%, n = 4), and Struvite (1.8%, n = 2). There was a strong relation between pre-operative CT density and the primary dust component (p < 0.001), with Uric Acid stones displaying significantly lower density (611.8 ± 263.2 HU) than Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate (1146.7 ± 335.7 HU). Aspirating stone dust during FURS provides a viable sample for FTIR spectroscopy, challenging the assumption that dust-only lithotripsy is inadequate for stone analysis and demonstrating a feasible, high-yield alternative when solid fragments are unretrievable.

从纯粉尘中建立结石成分:吸力辅助输尿管软镜FTIR光谱分析的可行性和分析结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书