Heterogeneous Response Patterns to Multispecies Probiotics in Patients With Constipation During Pregnancy: An Exploratory Analysis of a Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Xu Zhiyue, Zhou Le, Ding Shengjie, Feng Ling, Wang Zhengping, Liu Guocheng, Cai Qinghua, Chen Hongbo, Zhao Xinling, Liu Yan, Gao Lili, Hou Xiaohua, Bai Tao, Liu Xinghui
{"title":"Heterogeneous Response Patterns to Multispecies Probiotics in Patients With Constipation During Pregnancy: An Exploratory Analysis of a Phase 2 Clinical Trial.","authors":"Xu Zhiyue, Zhou Le, Ding Shengjie, Feng Ling, Wang Zhengping, Liu Guocheng, Cai Qinghua, Chen Hongbo, Zhao Xinling, Liu Yan, Gao Lili, Hou Xiaohua, Bai Tao, Liu Xinghui","doi":"10.1111/jgh.70746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multispecies probiotics in patients with constipation during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted across 10 hospitals in China. One hundred and twenty-two pregnant females with constipation were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either multispecies probiotics or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a mean CSBM frequency of ≥ 3 per week across the entire 8-week treatment period, together with an increase of ≥ 1 CSBM per week from the baseline weekly average.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall response rate did not differ significantly between probiotics (22.78%) and placebo groups (20.51%) (p = 0.779). Weekly response rates showed different temporal patterns between groups (P for interaction = 0.024); however, this did not result in a significant between-group difference at Week 8. In post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses, for patients with baseline SBM < 3/week, baseline straining score ≤ 2, baseline stool consistency score ≤ 2 (Type 1 or 2), and gestational weeks > 20 weeks, the weekly response rate in probiotics increased faster during the treatment period. The probiotic treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multispecies probiotics were safe and well tolerated during pregnancy but did not significantly improve the prespecified primary endpoint within an 8-week treatment period. Post hoc subgroup analyses suggested potentially heterogeneous response trajectories according to baseline bowel frequency, straining severity, stool consistency, and gestational age; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.70746","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multispecies probiotics in patients with constipation during pregnancy.

Methods: This Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted across 10 hospitals in China. One hundred and twenty-two pregnant females with constipation were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either multispecies probiotics or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a mean CSBM frequency of ≥ 3 per week across the entire 8-week treatment period, together with an increase of ≥ 1 CSBM per week from the baseline weekly average.

Results: The overall response rate did not differ significantly between probiotics (22.78%) and placebo groups (20.51%) (p = 0.779). Weekly response rates showed different temporal patterns between groups (P for interaction = 0.024); however, this did not result in a significant between-group difference at Week 8. In post hoc exploratory subgroup analyses, for patients with baseline SBM < 3/week, baseline straining score ≤ 2, baseline stool consistency score ≤ 2 (Type 1 or 2), and gestational weeks > 20 weeks, the weekly response rate in probiotics increased faster during the treatment period. The probiotic treatment was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events observed.

Conclusions: Multispecies probiotics were safe and well tolerated during pregnancy but did not significantly improve the prespecified primary endpoint within an 8-week treatment period. Post hoc subgroup analyses suggested potentially heterogeneous response trajectories according to baseline bowel frequency, straining severity, stool consistency, and gestational age; however, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

妊娠期便秘患者对多种益生菌的异质反应模式:一项2期临床试验的探索性分析
目的:本研究旨在评价多种益生菌对妊娠期便秘患者的疗效和安全性。方法:该二期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验在中国10家医院进行。122名患有便秘的孕妇按2:1的比例随机分配,接受多物种益生菌或安慰剂8周。主要疗效终点是在整个8周治疗期间达到每周平均CSBM频率≥3次的患者比例,以及每周基线平均增加≥1次CSBM的患者比例。结果:益生菌组(22.78%)和安慰剂组(20.51%)的总有效率无显著差异(p = 0.779)。周反应率在两组间表现出不同的时间模式(交互作用P = 0.024);然而,在第8周,这并没有导致组间的显著差异。在事后的探索性亚组分析中,对于基线SBM为20周的患者,益生菌的周反应率在治疗期间增加得更快。益生菌治疗耐受性良好,未观察到严重不良事件。结论:多种类益生菌在妊娠期间是安全且耐受性良好的,但在8周的治疗期间没有显著改善预定的主要终点。事后亚组分析表明,根据基线排便频率、紧张程度、粪便一致性和胎龄,可能存在异质性反应轨迹;然而,这些发现应该谨慎解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书