Validation of a Low-Cost Surgical Simulation Model for Cleft Lip Repair Training: A Multicentre Trainer-Trainee Workshop Study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Madhubari Vathulya, Smruti Srinivasan, Hemanth Kumar K, Deviprasad Mohapatra, Konstanze Scheller, Peter Kessler
{"title":"Validation of a Low-Cost Surgical Simulation Model for Cleft Lip Repair Training: A Multicentre Trainer-Trainee Workshop Study.","authors":"Madhubari Vathulya, Smruti Srinivasan, Hemanth Kumar K, Deviprasad Mohapatra, Konstanze Scheller, Peter Kessler","doi":"10.1177/10556656261495084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the face, content and construct validity of a low-cost unilateral cleft lip trainer through a multicentre trainee-trainer workshop.DesignProspective multicentre validation study.SettingThree accredited plastic surgery training centres.Patients/ParticipantsSixty-two plastic surgery residents participated in standardised simulation workshops.InterventionsParticipants underwent lectures, video demonstrations and supervised practice of unilateral cleft lip repair using the low-cost simulator. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires assessed self-reported knowledge and procedural understanding. Participants rated the model for face and content validity using a 5-point Likert scale. Faculty assessed simulator-based performance using a 10-point checklist.Main Outcome Measure(s)Face validity, content validity, construct validity, pre- and post-workshop knowledge scores, repair time, suture-line integrity and lip-height symmetry.ResultsKnowledge scores increased from 55% to 87%, with significant improvement in chronological recall of repair steps (P < .001). Face validity exceeded 90% across anatomical and procedural domains, with teaching usefulness rated highest (98%). Content validity was strongly supported, with 99% of participants recommending curriculum integration. Construct validity demonstrated significant discrimination between first-, second- and third-year residents, with mean performance scores of 7.1, 8.4 and 9.6, respectively (P < .001). Repair times decreased with increasing training level, while senior trainees achieved superior repair quality.ConclusionsThe low-cost unilateral cleft lip trainer demonstrated favourable face, content and construct validity within a structured workshop setting. Its affordability and reproducibility support its use as an adjunct for procedural rehearsal and assessment in plastic surgery training.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656261495084"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261495084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the face, content and construct validity of a low-cost unilateral cleft lip trainer through a multicentre trainee-trainer workshop.DesignProspective multicentre validation study.SettingThree accredited plastic surgery training centres.Patients/ParticipantsSixty-two plastic surgery residents participated in standardised simulation workshops.InterventionsParticipants underwent lectures, video demonstrations and supervised practice of unilateral cleft lip repair using the low-cost simulator. Pre- and post-workshop questionnaires assessed self-reported knowledge and procedural understanding. Participants rated the model for face and content validity using a 5-point Likert scale. Faculty assessed simulator-based performance using a 10-point checklist.Main Outcome Measure(s)Face validity, content validity, construct validity, pre- and post-workshop knowledge scores, repair time, suture-line integrity and lip-height symmetry.ResultsKnowledge scores increased from 55% to 87%, with significant improvement in chronological recall of repair steps (P < .001). Face validity exceeded 90% across anatomical and procedural domains, with teaching usefulness rated highest (98%). Content validity was strongly supported, with 99% of participants recommending curriculum integration. Construct validity demonstrated significant discrimination between first-, second- and third-year residents, with mean performance scores of 7.1, 8.4 and 9.6, respectively (P < .001). Repair times decreased with increasing training level, while senior trainees achieved superior repair quality.ConclusionsThe low-cost unilateral cleft lip trainer demonstrated favourable face, content and construct validity within a structured workshop setting. Its affordability and reproducibility support its use as an adjunct for procedural rehearsal and assessment in plastic surgery training.

唇裂修复训练低成本手术模拟模型的验证:一项多中心培训师-学员工作坊研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书