Moxibustion Regulates the Imbalance of Cartilage Degradation and Repair in Knee Osteoarthritis Rabbits via the SDF-1/CXCR4 Axis: Is Stimulating Heat-Sensitized Acupoints More Efficacious?
{"title":"Moxibustion Regulates the Imbalance of Cartilage Degradation and Repair in Knee Osteoarthritis Rabbits via the SDF-1/CXCR4 Axis: Is Stimulating Heat-Sensitized Acupoints More Efficacious?","authors":"Linhui Li, Rong Chen, Ying Zhang, Ling Hu, Yun Qiu, Chunchuan Yan, Leixiang Xia, Xu Zhou","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S625390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study investigated whether moxibustion, particularly at heat-sensitized acupoints, exerts therapeutic effects on knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and whether these effects are associated with the modulation of the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling axis, a key regulator of cartilage metabolism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A KOA model was induced in rabbits, which were then randomized into control (n=6), model (n=6), and moxibustion groups. Following a 14-day moxibustion intervention, the moxibustion group was further classified into heat-sensitive moxibustion (HSM, n=6) and non-heat-sensitive moxibustion (NSM, n=6) subgroups based on thermal response measured by infrared thermal imaging. Heat-sensitization was defined as a sustained distal skin temperature elevation ≥ 1°C during treatment, while non-heat-sensitive was defined as an elevation < 1°C. After a 14-day intervention, outcomes were assessed via the Lequesne MG index, histopathology, RT-qPCR, Western blot, and Micro-CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the model group (Lequesne score: 9.667±1.633), both HSM (3.167±0.753, p<0.01) and NSM (5.000±0.894, p<0.01) significantly improved joint function. HSM significantly outperformed NSM (p<0.05). At the molecular level, HSM significantly downregulated SDF-1 (1.570±0.131 vs 1.957±0.301, p<0.05), CXCR4 (1.902±0.318 vs 2.313±0.277, p<0.05), and MMP-13 (2.166±0.312 vs 2.608±0.340, p<0.05) mRNA expression, while significantly upregulating SOX9 (0.774±0.086 vs 0.638±0.089, p<0.05) and Col2a1 (0.728±0.091 vs 0.601±0.078, p<0.05) compared to NSM. In terms of subchondral bone, although both moxibustion groups showed significant improvements over the model group (all p<0.05), no statistically significant differences were observed between HSM and NSM for BMD, BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, or Tb.Sp (all p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moxibustion ameliorates KOA, and this effect is accompanied by the suppression of the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling axis and restoration of the balance between cartilage catabolism and anabolism. Stimulation of heat-sensitized acupoints offers superior benefits for functional recovery and molecular markers of cartilage repair compared to non-heat-sensitive acupoints, although this advantage was not observed in subchondral bone parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"19 ","pages":"625390"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13651731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S625390","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study investigated whether moxibustion, particularly at heat-sensitized acupoints, exerts therapeutic effects on knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and whether these effects are associated with the modulation of the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling axis, a key regulator of cartilage metabolism.
Methods: A KOA model was induced in rabbits, which were then randomized into control (n=6), model (n=6), and moxibustion groups. Following a 14-day moxibustion intervention, the moxibustion group was further classified into heat-sensitive moxibustion (HSM, n=6) and non-heat-sensitive moxibustion (NSM, n=6) subgroups based on thermal response measured by infrared thermal imaging. Heat-sensitization was defined as a sustained distal skin temperature elevation ≥ 1°C during treatment, while non-heat-sensitive was defined as an elevation < 1°C. After a 14-day intervention, outcomes were assessed via the Lequesne MG index, histopathology, RT-qPCR, Western blot, and Micro-CT.
Results: Compared to the model group (Lequesne score: 9.667±1.633), both HSM (3.167±0.753, p<0.01) and NSM (5.000±0.894, p<0.01) significantly improved joint function. HSM significantly outperformed NSM (p<0.05). At the molecular level, HSM significantly downregulated SDF-1 (1.570±0.131 vs 1.957±0.301, p<0.05), CXCR4 (1.902±0.318 vs 2.313±0.277, p<0.05), and MMP-13 (2.166±0.312 vs 2.608±0.340, p<0.05) mRNA expression, while significantly upregulating SOX9 (0.774±0.086 vs 0.638±0.089, p<0.05) and Col2a1 (0.728±0.091 vs 0.601±0.078, p<0.05) compared to NSM. In terms of subchondral bone, although both moxibustion groups showed significant improvements over the model group (all p<0.05), no statistically significant differences were observed between HSM and NSM for BMD, BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th, or Tb.Sp (all p>0.05).
Conclusion: Moxibustion ameliorates KOA, and this effect is accompanied by the suppression of the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling axis and restoration of the balance between cartilage catabolism and anabolism. Stimulation of heat-sensitized acupoints offers superior benefits for functional recovery and molecular markers of cartilage repair compared to non-heat-sensitive acupoints, although this advantage was not observed in subchondral bone parameters.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.