The Infected Homo Sacer: The (Auto)Immunity and Biopolitics of Haitian Zombies in Junot Díaz's "Monstro".

IF 2.1 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Faezeh Mohajeri
{"title":"The Infected Homo Sacer: The (Auto)Immunity and Biopolitics of Haitian Zombies in Junot Díaz's \"Monstro\".","authors":"Faezeh Mohajeri","doi":"10.1007/s11673-026-10629-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reconsiders the figure of the zombie in Junot Díaz's \"Monstro\" by shifting attention to its role as a biopolitical mechanism that determines who is protected, abandoned, and left to die. While existing scholarship has tended to read the zombie as an allegory of colonial trauma and racial violence, this study argues that zombification operates as a material technology of governance through which populations are classified, regulated, and exposed to varying degrees of precarity within neoliberal regimes. Drawing on Agamben's concept of homo sacer and Mbembe's necropolitics, the article shows how relocation camps function as spaces of exception in which bare life is produced through the suspension of legal and political protections. It further examines how racialized and gendered objectification operates across both micro and macro scales, revealing the logic of inclusive exclusion that structures these regimes of life management. Finally, through Derrida's theory of autoimmunity and Esposito's concept of immunity, the article argues that the violence in the narrative emerges from a system that destroys its own protective mechanisms in the pursuit of security. In doing so, \"Monstro\" exposes zombification as a site where neoliberal sovereignty, necropolitical governance, and autoimmune logic converge in the production of disposable life.</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-026-10629-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reconsiders the figure of the zombie in Junot Díaz's "Monstro" by shifting attention to its role as a biopolitical mechanism that determines who is protected, abandoned, and left to die. While existing scholarship has tended to read the zombie as an allegory of colonial trauma and racial violence, this study argues that zombification operates as a material technology of governance through which populations are classified, regulated, and exposed to varying degrees of precarity within neoliberal regimes. Drawing on Agamben's concept of homo sacer and Mbembe's necropolitics, the article shows how relocation camps function as spaces of exception in which bare life is produced through the suspension of legal and political protections. It further examines how racialized and gendered objectification operates across both micro and macro scales, revealing the logic of inclusive exclusion that structures these regimes of life management. Finally, through Derrida's theory of autoimmunity and Esposito's concept of immunity, the article argues that the violence in the narrative emerges from a system that destroys its own protective mechanisms in the pursuit of security. In doing so, "Monstro" exposes zombification as a site where neoliberal sovereignty, necropolitical governance, and autoimmune logic converge in the production of disposable life.

受感染的人:(自动)免疫和海地僵尸的生命政治在朱诺Díaz的“怪物”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following: -philosophy- bioethics- economics- social theory- law- public health and epidemiology- anthropology- psychology- feminism- gay and lesbian studies- linguistics and discourse analysis- cultural studies- disability studies- history- literature and literary studies- environmental sciences- theology and religious studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书