{"title":"The Infected Homo Sacer: The (Auto)Immunity and Biopolitics of Haitian Zombies in Junot Díaz's \"Monstro\".","authors":"Faezeh Mohajeri","doi":"10.1007/s11673-026-10629-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reconsiders the figure of the zombie in Junot Díaz's \"Monstro\" by shifting attention to its role as a biopolitical mechanism that determines who is protected, abandoned, and left to die. While existing scholarship has tended to read the zombie as an allegory of colonial trauma and racial violence, this study argues that zombification operates as a material technology of governance through which populations are classified, regulated, and exposed to varying degrees of precarity within neoliberal regimes. Drawing on Agamben's concept of homo sacer and Mbembe's necropolitics, the article shows how relocation camps function as spaces of exception in which bare life is produced through the suspension of legal and political protections. It further examines how racialized and gendered objectification operates across both micro and macro scales, revealing the logic of inclusive exclusion that structures these regimes of life management. Finally, through Derrida's theory of autoimmunity and Esposito's concept of immunity, the article argues that the violence in the narrative emerges from a system that destroys its own protective mechanisms in the pursuit of security. In doing so, \"Monstro\" exposes zombification as a site where neoliberal sovereignty, necropolitical governance, and autoimmune logic converge in the production of disposable life.</p>","PeriodicalId":50252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bioethical Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-026-10629-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article reconsiders the figure of the zombie in Junot Díaz's "Monstro" by shifting attention to its role as a biopolitical mechanism that determines who is protected, abandoned, and left to die. While existing scholarship has tended to read the zombie as an allegory of colonial trauma and racial violence, this study argues that zombification operates as a material technology of governance through which populations are classified, regulated, and exposed to varying degrees of precarity within neoliberal regimes. Drawing on Agamben's concept of homo sacer and Mbembe's necropolitics, the article shows how relocation camps function as spaces of exception in which bare life is produced through the suspension of legal and political protections. It further examines how racialized and gendered objectification operates across both micro and macro scales, revealing the logic of inclusive exclusion that structures these regimes of life management. Finally, through Derrida's theory of autoimmunity and Esposito's concept of immunity, the article argues that the violence in the narrative emerges from a system that destroys its own protective mechanisms in the pursuit of security. In doing so, "Monstro" exposes zombification as a site where neoliberal sovereignty, necropolitical governance, and autoimmune logic converge in the production of disposable life.
期刊介绍:
The JBI welcomes both reports of empirical research and articles that increase theoretical understanding of medicine and health care, the health professions and the biological sciences. The JBI is also open to critical reflections on medicine and conventional bioethics, the nature of health, illness and disability, the sources of ethics, the nature of ethical communities, and possible implications of new developments in science and technology for social and cultural life and human identity. We welcome contributions from perspectives that are less commonly published in existing journals in the field and reports of empirical research studies using both qualitative and quantitative methodologies.
The JBI accepts contributions from authors working in or across disciplines including – but not limited to – the following:
-philosophy-
bioethics-
economics-
social theory-
law-
public health and epidemiology-
anthropology-
psychology-
feminism-
gay and lesbian studies-
linguistics and discourse analysis-
cultural studies-
disability studies-
history-
literature and literary studies-
environmental sciences-
theology and religious studies