{"title":"Multidimensional vulnerabilities of informal settlements in the Urban South.","authors":"Mingxing Chen, Wenming Song, Dadao Lu, Yu Deng, Chenglong Wang, Huiping Jiang, Yuyu Zhou, Murray W Scown, Liangkan Chen, Jing Ma, Heran Zheng, Xuemei Bai","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2523034123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Informal settlements are widespread and rapidly growing, often associated with high vulnerabilities. However, global-scale understanding on their spatial distribution and complexity of vulnerability is limited. Here, we delineate the informal settlements across a sample of 1,914 cities of the Global South by integrating Sentinel-2 imagery with deep learning models, and we explore the heterogeneity of vulnerability using Urban Informal Settlement Vulnerability Index that encompasses living conditions, social infrastructure, and environmental risk. We found that Urban Informal Settlements cover 12.94 ± 2.52% of their total urban areas (approximately 34.04 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup>), especially in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Middle Asia. Sub-Saharan African cities have the highest vulnerability of informal settlements, with 31.75 ± 6.20% of total urban areas being occupied by informal settlements, while East Asian cities exhibit relatively low vulnerability across all dimensions. We also find that urban informal settlements with high environmental exposure are widespread in the Global South, and there is a significantly polarized distribution between \"low\" and \"high\" vulnerability categories. The findings highlight the disparate distribution of multidimensional vulnerability in informal settlements across the Urban South, providing a comparative evidence base for further local assessment and context-specific policy discussions related to SDG 11.</p>","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"123 42","pages":"e2523034123"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13684284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2523034123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Informal settlements are widespread and rapidly growing, often associated with high vulnerabilities. However, global-scale understanding on their spatial distribution and complexity of vulnerability is limited. Here, we delineate the informal settlements across a sample of 1,914 cities of the Global South by integrating Sentinel-2 imagery with deep learning models, and we explore the heterogeneity of vulnerability using Urban Informal Settlement Vulnerability Index that encompasses living conditions, social infrastructure, and environmental risk. We found that Urban Informal Settlements cover 12.94 ± 2.52% of their total urban areas (approximately 34.04 × 103 km2), especially in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Middle Asia. Sub-Saharan African cities have the highest vulnerability of informal settlements, with 31.75 ± 6.20% of total urban areas being occupied by informal settlements, while East Asian cities exhibit relatively low vulnerability across all dimensions. We also find that urban informal settlements with high environmental exposure are widespread in the Global South, and there is a significantly polarized distribution between "low" and "high" vulnerability categories. The findings highlight the disparate distribution of multidimensional vulnerability in informal settlements across the Urban South, providing a comparative evidence base for further local assessment and context-specific policy discussions related to SDG 11.
期刊介绍:
The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.