Multidimensional vulnerabilities of informal settlements in the Urban South.

IF 9.5 1区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Mingxing Chen, Wenming Song, Dadao Lu, Yu Deng, Chenglong Wang, Huiping Jiang, Yuyu Zhou, Murray W Scown, Liangkan Chen, Jing Ma, Heran Zheng, Xuemei Bai
{"title":"Multidimensional vulnerabilities of informal settlements in the Urban South.","authors":"Mingxing Chen, Wenming Song, Dadao Lu, Yu Deng, Chenglong Wang, Huiping Jiang, Yuyu Zhou, Murray W Scown, Liangkan Chen, Jing Ma, Heran Zheng, Xuemei Bai","doi":"10.1073/pnas.2523034123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Informal settlements are widespread and rapidly growing, often associated with high vulnerabilities. However, global-scale understanding on their spatial distribution and complexity of vulnerability is limited. Here, we delineate the informal settlements across a sample of 1,914 cities of the Global South by integrating Sentinel-2 imagery with deep learning models, and we explore the heterogeneity of vulnerability using Urban Informal Settlement Vulnerability Index that encompasses living conditions, social infrastructure, and environmental risk. We found that Urban Informal Settlements cover 12.94 ± 2.52% of their total urban areas (approximately 34.04 × 10<sup>3</sup> km<sup>2</sup>), especially in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Middle Asia. Sub-Saharan African cities have the highest vulnerability of informal settlements, with 31.75 ± 6.20% of total urban areas being occupied by informal settlements, while East Asian cities exhibit relatively low vulnerability across all dimensions. We also find that urban informal settlements with high environmental exposure are widespread in the Global South, and there is a significantly polarized distribution between \"low\" and \"high\" vulnerability categories. The findings highlight the disparate distribution of multidimensional vulnerability in informal settlements across the Urban South, providing a comparative evidence base for further local assessment and context-specific policy discussions related to SDG 11.</p>","PeriodicalId":20548,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","volume":"123 42","pages":"e2523034123"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13684284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2523034123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Informal settlements are widespread and rapidly growing, often associated with high vulnerabilities. However, global-scale understanding on their spatial distribution and complexity of vulnerability is limited. Here, we delineate the informal settlements across a sample of 1,914 cities of the Global South by integrating Sentinel-2 imagery with deep learning models, and we explore the heterogeneity of vulnerability using Urban Informal Settlement Vulnerability Index that encompasses living conditions, social infrastructure, and environmental risk. We found that Urban Informal Settlements cover 12.94 ± 2.52% of their total urban areas (approximately 34.04 × 103 km2), especially in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Middle Asia. Sub-Saharan African cities have the highest vulnerability of informal settlements, with 31.75 ± 6.20% of total urban areas being occupied by informal settlements, while East Asian cities exhibit relatively low vulnerability across all dimensions. We also find that urban informal settlements with high environmental exposure are widespread in the Global South, and there is a significantly polarized distribution between "low" and "high" vulnerability categories. The findings highlight the disparate distribution of multidimensional vulnerability in informal settlements across the Urban South, providing a comparative evidence base for further local assessment and context-specific policy discussions related to SDG 11.

南方城市非正规住区的多维脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
3575
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer-reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), serves as an authoritative source for high-impact, original research across the biological, physical, and social sciences. With a global scope, the journal welcomes submissions from researchers worldwide, making it an inclusive platform for advancing scientific knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书