Delayed Cord Clamping Practice in the Delivery Rooms of a Regional Referral Hospital and Two Lower Health Centres in Uganda: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.8 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics Pub Date : 2026-10-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PHMT.S619406
Winfred Mutaki, Vivian Mutaki, Francis Mbolwa, Jacob Otile, Patrick James Kalanga, Moses Mawanda, James Ditai
{"title":"Delayed Cord Clamping Practice in the Delivery Rooms of a Regional Referral Hospital and Two Lower Health Centres in Uganda: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Winfred Mutaki, Vivian Mutaki, Francis Mbolwa, Jacob Otile, Patrick James Kalanga, Moses Mawanda, James Ditai","doi":"10.2147/PHMT.S619406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>World Health Organization (WHO) recommends delayed umbilical cord clamping (DCC) by 1-3 minutes to improve infant iron status and reduce anaemia. Few countries have adopted policies on this practice. We assessed the practice of DCC among skilled birth attendants in resource-limited delivery rooms at three levels of the health care system in Mbale district, Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This facility-based, analytical cross-sectional study directly observed 379 births and their skilled birth attendants at Mbale Regional Referral, Namatala Health Centre IV, and Nakaloke Health Centre III in Mbale, eastern Uganda. Research assistants used a stopwatch to record the delivery-to-cord-clamping interval. Timing was compared overall and by birth attendant category (Doctors, midwives, and students) and mode of delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, half (52.0%, 197/379) (95% CI: 46.9% - 57.0%) of newborns had their cords clamped after at least 60seconds, a practice of delayed cord clamping (DCC). The remaining half (182/379; 48.0%) were clamped before 60s, and about a quarter (26.1%; 99/379) were clamped before 30s. The median (5<sup>th</sup>, 95<sup>th</sup> percentile) cord clamping time was 65seconds (8.35, 393.79) overall, but varied within the birth attendant category: 124.0 (22, 408.7) s for midwives, 22.45 (5.5, 80) s for doctors, and 56.8 (11.8, 471.7) s for students. The prevalence of DCC was far higher among midwives (crude PR 9.2; 95% CI:4.7-18.0) and students (crude PR 5.7; 95% CI:2.8-11.7) than doctors; this attenuated to non-significance after adjusting for mode of delivery (adjusted PR 2.1 for both, p=0.061).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only about half of newborns received DCC in these delivery rooms. The large crude difference between doctors and midwives reflected doctors performing nearly all caesarean sections, where ICC predominated, rather than provider practice alone. This study describes the timing of cord clamping among skilled birth attendants in resource-limited delivery rooms.</p>","PeriodicalId":74410,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics","volume":"17 ","pages":"619406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13653525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PHMT.S619406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: World Health Organization (WHO) recommends delayed umbilical cord clamping (DCC) by 1-3 minutes to improve infant iron status and reduce anaemia. Few countries have adopted policies on this practice. We assessed the practice of DCC among skilled birth attendants in resource-limited delivery rooms at three levels of the health care system in Mbale district, Uganda.

Methods: This facility-based, analytical cross-sectional study directly observed 379 births and their skilled birth attendants at Mbale Regional Referral, Namatala Health Centre IV, and Nakaloke Health Centre III in Mbale, eastern Uganda. Research assistants used a stopwatch to record the delivery-to-cord-clamping interval. Timing was compared overall and by birth attendant category (Doctors, midwives, and students) and mode of delivery.

Results: Overall, half (52.0%, 197/379) (95% CI: 46.9% - 57.0%) of newborns had their cords clamped after at least 60seconds, a practice of delayed cord clamping (DCC). The remaining half (182/379; 48.0%) were clamped before 60s, and about a quarter (26.1%; 99/379) were clamped before 30s. The median (5th, 95th percentile) cord clamping time was 65seconds (8.35, 393.79) overall, but varied within the birth attendant category: 124.0 (22, 408.7) s for midwives, 22.45 (5.5, 80) s for doctors, and 56.8 (11.8, 471.7) s for students. The prevalence of DCC was far higher among midwives (crude PR 9.2; 95% CI:4.7-18.0) and students (crude PR 5.7; 95% CI:2.8-11.7) than doctors; this attenuated to non-significance after adjusting for mode of delivery (adjusted PR 2.1 for both, p=0.061).

Conclusion: Only about half of newborns received DCC in these delivery rooms. The large crude difference between doctors and midwives reflected doctors performing nearly all caesarean sections, where ICC predominated, rather than provider practice alone. This study describes the timing of cord clamping among skilled birth attendants in resource-limited delivery rooms.

乌干达一家地区转诊医院和两家低级保健中心产房的延迟脐带夹紧做法:一项基于设施的横断面研究。
背景:世界卫生组织(WHO)建议延迟1-3分钟脐带夹紧(DCC)以改善婴儿铁状态并减少贫血。很少有国家对这种做法采取政策。我们评估了乌干达Mbale地区三级卫生保健系统中资源有限的产房中熟练助产士的DCC实践。方法:这项以设施为基础的分析性横断面研究直接观察了乌干达东部姆巴莱地区转诊中心、纳玛塔拉第四保健中心和Nakaloke第三保健中心的379名新生儿及其熟练助产士。研究助理用一个秒表记录从送货到夹紧脐带的时间间隔。对分娩时间进行总体比较,并按助产士类别(医生、助产士和学生)和分娩方式进行比较。结果:总体而言,半数(52.0%,199 /379)(95% CI: 46.9% - 57.0%)新生儿在至少60秒后夹住脐带,采用延迟夹住脐带(DCC)。其余一半(182/379,48.0%)在60岁前夹紧,约四分之一(26.1%,99/379)在30岁前夹紧。脐带夹紧时间的中位数(第5,第95个百分点)为65秒(8.35,393.79),但在助产士类别中存在差异:助产士124.0(22,408.7)秒,医生22.45(5.5,80)秒,学生56.8(11.8,471.7)秒。助产士(粗PR 9.2, 95% CI:4.7-18.0)和学生(粗PR 5.7, 95% CI:2.8-11.7)的DCC患病率远高于医生;在调整分娩方式后,这种差异减弱为无显著性(两者的调整PR均为2.1,p=0.061)。结论:在这些产房中,只有约一半的新生儿接受了DCC。医生和助产士之间的巨大差异反映了医生几乎执行了所有剖腹产手术,而不是单独的提供者实践,其中ICC占主导地位。本研究描述了在资源有限的产房熟练助产士脐带夹夹的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书