Private Media, Public Funds, and Democratic Allocation: Outlining the Civic Strategy in Media Policy.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Philosophy and Technology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s13347-026-01035-2
Rubén Marciel
{"title":"Private Media, Public Funds, and Democratic Allocation: Outlining the Civic Strategy in Media Policy.","authors":"Rubén Marciel","doi":"10.1007/s13347-026-01035-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After the digital revolution, quality journalism is more necessary than ever. And yet, journalism is undergoing an unprecedented economic crisis precisely because the digital revolution led its advertisement-based funding system to collapse. How can we save journalism as a key institution for upholding the quality of democratic deliberation? Most approaches to this question focus either on media literacy campaigns, restricting the dissemination of disinformation, or fostering public media. This article explores another, largely neglected approach: the civic strategy in media policy, which consists of distributing public funds among private news media through democratic allocation mechanisms. Civic media policies promise to create a more democratic media system, enhance media pluralism, and, crucially, secure robust funding for quality journalism. To examine how they might do so, I assess the four main proposals within this civic paradigm: Cagé's proposal to create 'nonprofit media organizations', Latham's 'voter-funded media' system, Ackerman's 'internet news voucher', and McChesney and Nichols' 'citizenship news voucher'. Drawing on a critical examination of these proposals, I extract some lessons for designing more effective civic media policies in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":39065,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Technology","volume":"39 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13649792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01035-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the digital revolution, quality journalism is more necessary than ever. And yet, journalism is undergoing an unprecedented economic crisis precisely because the digital revolution led its advertisement-based funding system to collapse. How can we save journalism as a key institution for upholding the quality of democratic deliberation? Most approaches to this question focus either on media literacy campaigns, restricting the dissemination of disinformation, or fostering public media. This article explores another, largely neglected approach: the civic strategy in media policy, which consists of distributing public funds among private news media through democratic allocation mechanisms. Civic media policies promise to create a more democratic media system, enhance media pluralism, and, crucially, secure robust funding for quality journalism. To examine how they might do so, I assess the four main proposals within this civic paradigm: Cagé's proposal to create 'nonprofit media organizations', Latham's 'voter-funded media' system, Ackerman's 'internet news voucher', and McChesney and Nichols' 'citizenship news voucher'. Drawing on a critical examination of these proposals, I extract some lessons for designing more effective civic media policies in the future.

私人媒体、公共资金与民主分配:媒体政策中的公民策略概述。
在数字革命之后,高质量的新闻比以往任何时候都更加必要。然而,新闻业正在经历一场前所未有的经济危机,正是因为数字革命导致其以广告为基础的资助体系崩溃。我们怎样才能挽救新闻业这个维护民主审议质量的关键机构?解决这个问题的大多数方法要么集中在媒体扫盲运动上,要么集中在限制虚假信息的传播上,要么集中在培养公共媒体上。本文探讨了另一种很大程度上被忽视的方法:媒体政策中的公民策略,它包括通过民主分配机制在私营新闻媒体之间分配公共资金。公民媒体政策承诺创建一个更民主的媒体体系,加强媒体多元化,最重要的是,为高质量的新闻提供充足的资金。为了研究他们是如何做到这一点的,我评估了这个公民范式中的四个主要建议:卡格雷提出的创建“非营利媒体组织”的建议,莱瑟姆的“选民资助的媒体”系统,阿克曼的“互联网新闻代金券”,以及麦克切斯尼和尼科尔斯的“公民新闻代金券”。通过对这些建议的批判性审查,我从中提取了一些经验教训,以便在未来设计更有效的公民媒体政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philosophy and Technology
Philosophy and Technology Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书