The Association Between the Vaccine Equity Initiative's Get Boosted Campaign and COVID-19 Vaccination in Massachusetts, 2022-2023.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Victoria M Nielsen, Khafayat Kadiri, Angela Fowler
{"title":"The Association Between the Vaccine Equity Initiative's Get Boosted Campaign and COVID-19 Vaccination in Massachusetts, 2022-2023.","authors":"Victoria M Nielsen, Khafayat Kadiri, Angela Fowler","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether the Vaccine Equity Initiative's (VEI) Get Boosted (GB) financial incentive increased rates of COVID-19 vaccination.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using an interrupted time series design.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The Massachusetts Department of Public Health selected municipalities for participation in VEI based on elevated scores on the Social Vulnerability Index and high COVID-19 cases. Using baseline data, we matched the 43 vaccine sites within the VEI municipalities offering the GB incentive to comparison vaccine sites on vaccine capacity and service population.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We extracted COVID-19 vaccination data from a statewide registry spanning May 31, 2022-May 30, 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The GB campaign offered a $75 gift card for receiving the COVID-19 vaccine in select vaccine sites within the VEI municipalities between October 24, 2022 and March 26, 2023.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Our outcome was rates of COVID-19 vaccination per 100 000 population. We created a binary variable indicating the GB sites during the incentive period to examine whether the incentive was associated with statistically significantly higher rates of vaccination. We generated weekly conditional rates of COVID-19 vaccination per 100 000 population accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to examine impact among subpopulations. Finally, we conducted sensitivity analyses to determine whether missing data, comparison site selection, or shifts in vaccine site traffic affected study conclusions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparison and GB sites had similar baseline socio-demographic characteristics and vaccination trends. The GB incentive period variable indicated that vaccination rates were statistically significantly higher during the GB campaign period at GB sites (IRR 2.29, 95% CI 2.12-2.48). In addition, COVID-19 vaccination rates at GB sites were statistically significantly higher than comparison sites during the campaign among all subpopulations. Sensitivity analyses agreed with our main findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Moderately sized, guaranteed incentives can increase COVID-19 vaccination. Our findings can be leveraged by public health practitioners to increase vaccine uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether the Vaccine Equity Initiative's (VEI) Get Boosted (GB) financial incentive increased rates of COVID-19 vaccination.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using an interrupted time series design.

Participants: The Massachusetts Department of Public Health selected municipalities for participation in VEI based on elevated scores on the Social Vulnerability Index and high COVID-19 cases. Using baseline data, we matched the 43 vaccine sites within the VEI municipalities offering the GB incentive to comparison vaccine sites on vaccine capacity and service population.

Setting: We extracted COVID-19 vaccination data from a statewide registry spanning May 31, 2022-May 30, 2023.

Intervention: The GB campaign offered a $75 gift card for receiving the COVID-19 vaccine in select vaccine sites within the VEI municipalities between October 24, 2022 and March 26, 2023.

Main outcome measures: Our outcome was rates of COVID-19 vaccination per 100 000 population. We created a binary variable indicating the GB sites during the incentive period to examine whether the incentive was associated with statistically significantly higher rates of vaccination. We generated weekly conditional rates of COVID-19 vaccination per 100 000 population accompanied by 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to examine impact among subpopulations. Finally, we conducted sensitivity analyses to determine whether missing data, comparison site selection, or shifts in vaccine site traffic affected study conclusions.

Results: Comparison and GB sites had similar baseline socio-demographic characteristics and vaccination trends. The GB incentive period variable indicated that vaccination rates were statistically significantly higher during the GB campaign period at GB sites (IRR 2.29, 95% CI 2.12-2.48). In addition, COVID-19 vaccination rates at GB sites were statistically significantly higher than comparison sites during the campaign among all subpopulations. Sensitivity analyses agreed with our main findings.

Conclusions: Moderately sized, guaranteed incentives can increase COVID-19 vaccination. Our findings can be leveraged by public health practitioners to increase vaccine uptake.

2022-2023年,马萨诸塞州疫苗公平倡议的促进运动与COVID-19疫苗接种之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书