Physical Rehabilitation for Postpartum Perineal Morbidity After Episiotomy and Childbirth-Related Perineal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.6 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2026-10-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.171902
Ayesha Alnashwan, Yasmin Mibrad Alenezi, Hala Mesbah Alruwaili, Waad Alshamrani, Sadeem Talal S Alanazi, Thana Ali Alqarni, Renad Hamed Alazwari, Khalid Abdulbaqi Alghareeb, Shahad Enad E Alenezi, Fatimah Farhan S Alanazi, Alruwaili Noor Abdullah B, Raniyah Inad B Alanazi, Abdulrhman A Almazrou, Abdulelah F Alshehri
{"title":"Physical Rehabilitation for Postpartum Perineal Morbidity After Episiotomy and Childbirth-Related Perineal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Ayesha Alnashwan, Yasmin Mibrad Alenezi, Hala Mesbah Alruwaili, Waad Alshamrani, Sadeem Talal S Alanazi, Thana Ali Alqarni, Renad Hamed Alazwari, Khalid Abdulbaqi Alghareeb, Shahad Enad E Alenezi, Fatimah Farhan S Alanazi, Alruwaili Noor Abdullah B, Raniyah Inad B Alanazi, Abdulrhman A Almazrou, Abdulelah F Alshehri","doi":"10.52965/001c.171902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postpartum perineal trauma commonly causes pain and delayed maternal recovery, yet randomized evidence supporting rehabilitation interventions remains fragmented.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of physical and electrophysical rehabilitation modalities for postpartum perineal pain, wound healing, and oedema following episiotomy or childbirth-related perineal trauma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP were searched from inception to April 7, 2026. Randomized controlled trials evaluating rehabilitation modalities were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed where appropriate, and methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine randomized controlled trials were included, seven of which contributed to quantitative synthesis. TENS significantly reduced short-term postpartum perineal pain compared with control (SMD -1.19, 95% CI -1.83 to -0.55). LLLT showed no significant benefit (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.52 to 0.19), while therapeutic ultrasound demonstrated no significant reduction in persistent pain. Narrative evidence indicated favorable effects of cooling interventions on oedema, immediate pain relief, and maternal satisfaction. Two studies were judged at low risk of bias, five had some concerns, and two were at high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review provides the first comparative synthesis of randomized evidence evaluating physical and electrophysical rehabilitation modalities for postpartum perineal morbidity. The strongest evidence currently supports TENS for short-term pain relief, whereas cooling interventions appear beneficial for local symptom management. Larger, rigorously designed randomized trials are required to establish evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for postpartum perineal recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"18 ","pages":"171902"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13652543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.171902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postpartum perineal trauma commonly causes pain and delayed maternal recovery, yet randomized evidence supporting rehabilitation interventions remains fragmented.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of physical and electrophysical rehabilitation modalities for postpartum perineal pain, wound healing, and oedema following episiotomy or childbirth-related perineal trauma.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP were searched from inception to April 7, 2026. Randomized controlled trials evaluating rehabilitation modalities were included. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed where appropriate, and methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.

Results: Nine randomized controlled trials were included, seven of which contributed to quantitative synthesis. TENS significantly reduced short-term postpartum perineal pain compared with control (SMD -1.19, 95% CI -1.83 to -0.55). LLLT showed no significant benefit (SMD -0.16, 95% CI -0.52 to 0.19), while therapeutic ultrasound demonstrated no significant reduction in persistent pain. Narrative evidence indicated favorable effects of cooling interventions on oedema, immediate pain relief, and maternal satisfaction. Two studies were judged at low risk of bias, five had some concerns, and two were at high risk of bias.

Conclusions: This review provides the first comparative synthesis of randomized evidence evaluating physical and electrophysical rehabilitation modalities for postpartum perineal morbidity. The strongest evidence currently supports TENS for short-term pain relief, whereas cooling interventions appear beneficial for local symptom management. Larger, rigorously designed randomized trials are required to establish evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for postpartum perineal recovery.

会阴切开术和分娩相关会阴创伤后产后会阴发病的物理康复:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书