An improved FMEA model based on EDAS method within fermatean fuzzy linguistic environment.

IF 2.6 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Science Progress Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-10-10 DOI:10.1177/00368504261491168
Ran Liu, Tian-Yu Liu, Qiang Li, Chun-Liu Tao
{"title":"An improved FMEA model based on EDAS method within fermatean fuzzy linguistic environment.","authors":"Ran Liu, Tian-Yu Liu, Qiang Li, Chun-Liu Tao","doi":"10.1177/00368504261491168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a systematic and proactive risk prevention and management tool used to identify and assess risks of potential or known failure modes within a system, product or service. However, the traditional FMEA has been criticized for a variety of drawbacks, which limit its efficiency and potential of applications. Although numerous approaches have been proposed to address these drawbacks, most of them fail to accommodate complex and uncertain decision-making environments, and neglect the conflicting criteria of failure modes. To address these issues, this study proposes an improved FMEA model that integrates Fermatean fuzzy linguistic sets (FFLSs) with the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method to assess and rank the risk of failure modes. First, the FFLSs are employed to represent the complex and uncertain risk assessments from experts. Then, a modified EDAS method is adopted to derive the risk ranking of failure modes. Additionally, the entropy weight method is improved to determine the weights of risk factors. Finally, a practical case is presented to illustrate the feasibility and reliability of the proposed FMEA model. The findings show that the proposed FMEA model can not only addresses most of the limitations in the traditional FMEA, but also yield reliable risk ranking of failure modes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"109 4","pages":"368504261491168"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504261491168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a systematic and proactive risk prevention and management tool used to identify and assess risks of potential or known failure modes within a system, product or service. However, the traditional FMEA has been criticized for a variety of drawbacks, which limit its efficiency and potential of applications. Although numerous approaches have been proposed to address these drawbacks, most of them fail to accommodate complex and uncertain decision-making environments, and neglect the conflicting criteria of failure modes. To address these issues, this study proposes an improved FMEA model that integrates Fermatean fuzzy linguistic sets (FFLSs) with the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method to assess and rank the risk of failure modes. First, the FFLSs are employed to represent the complex and uncertain risk assessments from experts. Then, a modified EDAS method is adopted to derive the risk ranking of failure modes. Additionally, the entropy weight method is improved to determine the weights of risk factors. Finally, a practical case is presented to illustrate the feasibility and reliability of the proposed FMEA model. The findings show that the proposed FMEA model can not only addresses most of the limitations in the traditional FMEA, but also yield reliable risk ranking of failure modes.

fermatan模糊语言环境下基于EDAS方法的改进FMEA模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science Progress
Science Progress Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书