Evaluating Postoperative Radiotherapy Pathways for Head and Neck Cancer Patients in a Regional Hospital in Australia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yu-Hsien Lin, Shannon Robards, Joel Abraham, Geordie Meekin, James Nightingale, Simon Liebenberg, Pedro Picco, Shivanshan Pathmanathan, Timothy Squire, Tao Daniel Xing
{"title":"Evaluating Postoperative Radiotherapy Pathways for Head and Neck Cancer Patients in a Regional Hospital in Australia.","authors":"Yu-Hsien Lin, Shannon Robards, Joel Abraham, Geordie Meekin, James Nightingale, Simon Liebenberg, Pedro Picco, Shivanshan Pathmanathan, Timothy Squire, Tao Daniel Xing","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.70188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Timely initiation of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is critical in head and neck cancer, with delays exceeding 42 days associated with inferior outcomes. However, delays remain common, particularly in regional settings. This study aimed to evaluate targeted quality improvement (QI) interventions on PORT timeliness in a regional Australian tertiary hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre QI study was conducted at Townsville University Hospital. Five interventions targeting referrals, multidisciplinary coordination, and radiotherapy workflow were implemented. Serial audits were performed six-monthly for three cycles and compared with pre-intervention. The primary outcome was time from surgery to PORT and the proportion of patients exceeding 42 days. Secondary outcomes included key interval analyses across the treatment pathway.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 78 patients were included (28 pre-intervention and 50 post-intervention). The QI interventions were associated with a 23 percentage-point absolute risk reduction in PORT delay (95% CI 2-42; p = 0.046). Median time to PORT decreased from 50 days pre-intervention to 42 days. Improvements were driven by reductions in early pathway delays, with surgery to radiation oncology (RO) consultation decreasing from 27 to 20.5 days. Timeliness of RO referrals for externally operated patients also improved (31 to 10 days). However, the interval from RO consult to PORT remained largely unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This QI project improved early pathway efficiency and reduced extreme delays in PORT. However, the persisting interval between RO consult and PORT likely reflects underlying radiotherapy delivery capacity constraints. Future work should focus on scheduling, resource allocation, and workforce capacity to further improve timeliness to PORT.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.70188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Timely initiation of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is critical in head and neck cancer, with delays exceeding 42 days associated with inferior outcomes. However, delays remain common, particularly in regional settings. This study aimed to evaluate targeted quality improvement (QI) interventions on PORT timeliness in a regional Australian tertiary hospital.

Methods: A single-centre QI study was conducted at Townsville University Hospital. Five interventions targeting referrals, multidisciplinary coordination, and radiotherapy workflow were implemented. Serial audits were performed six-monthly for three cycles and compared with pre-intervention. The primary outcome was time from surgery to PORT and the proportion of patients exceeding 42 days. Secondary outcomes included key interval analyses across the treatment pathway.

Results: A total of 78 patients were included (28 pre-intervention and 50 post-intervention). The QI interventions were associated with a 23 percentage-point absolute risk reduction in PORT delay (95% CI 2-42; p = 0.046). Median time to PORT decreased from 50 days pre-intervention to 42 days. Improvements were driven by reductions in early pathway delays, with surgery to radiation oncology (RO) consultation decreasing from 27 to 20.5 days. Timeliness of RO referrals for externally operated patients also improved (31 to 10 days). However, the interval from RO consult to PORT remained largely unchanged.

Conclusion: This QI project improved early pathway efficiency and reduced extreme delays in PORT. However, the persisting interval between RO consult and PORT likely reflects underlying radiotherapy delivery capacity constraints. Future work should focus on scheduling, resource allocation, and workforce capacity to further improve timeliness to PORT.

评价澳大利亚一家地区医院头颈癌患者术后放疗途径
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书