Biliary Microbiology and Antimicrobial Treatment Modification in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.
Berkan Acar, Ali Muhtaroğlu, Selman Alkan, Elif Yılmaz, Serdar Acar, Yavuz Çekiç, Mehmet Yıldız
{"title":"Biliary Microbiology and Antimicrobial Treatment Modification in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Berkan Acar, Ali Muhtaroğlu, Selman Alkan, Elif Yılmaz, Serdar Acar, Yavuz Çekiç, Mehmet Yıldız","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S638067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe bile culture yield, organism distribution and antimicrobial treatment modification in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for acute cholecystitis who were unsuitable for early cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 84 consecutive patients who underwent PC between December 2021 and December 2025. Index bile cultures were classified as positive, no growth, or not obtained. We analysed organisms, polymicrobial growth, empirical antimicrobial therapy, treatment modification and clinical outcomes by culture status and disease severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bile was cultured in 71 patients (84.5%), and 33 cultures were positive (46.5% of sampled patients; 39.3% of the cohort). Seven positive cultures (21.2%) were polymicrobial. The leading isolates were <i>Escherichia coli</i> (n=13), <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> (n=9) and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (n=8). Ceftriaxone plus metronidazole was the most common empirical regimen (52/84, 61.9%). Treatment was modified in 20 patients (23.8%); half of the modified regimens contained a carbapenem. Modification was more frequent among patients requiring intensive care (46.2% versus 13.8%; crude odds ratio [OR] 5.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-15.67) and those with Tokyo grade III disease (41.9% versus 13.2%; crude OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.63-13.81). No statistically significant difference was detected between the positive-culture and no-growth groups in treatment modification (24.2% versus 23.7%), in-hospital adverse events (24.2% versus 31.6%), 30-day mortality (12.1% versus 13.2%) or 90-day mortality among evaluable patients (6/32 [18.8%] versus 10/37 [27.0%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bile obtained during PC had a substantial microbiological yield and grew predominantly enteric organisms. Treatment modification was more frequent in clinically severe disease, but no statistically significant difference was detected between positive-culture and no-growth groups. Bile culture should inform a structured reassessment of antimicrobials after source control, rather than automatic treatment escalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"19 ","pages":"638067"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13653542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S638067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To describe bile culture yield, organism distribution and antimicrobial treatment modification in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for acute cholecystitis who were unsuitable for early cholecystectomy.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 84 consecutive patients who underwent PC between December 2021 and December 2025. Index bile cultures were classified as positive, no growth, or not obtained. We analysed organisms, polymicrobial growth, empirical antimicrobial therapy, treatment modification and clinical outcomes by culture status and disease severity.
Results: Bile was cultured in 71 patients (84.5%), and 33 cultures were positive (46.5% of sampled patients; 39.3% of the cohort). Seven positive cultures (21.2%) were polymicrobial. The leading isolates were Escherichia coli (n=13), Enterococcus faecium (n=9) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=8). Ceftriaxone plus metronidazole was the most common empirical regimen (52/84, 61.9%). Treatment was modified in 20 patients (23.8%); half of the modified regimens contained a carbapenem. Modification was more frequent among patients requiring intensive care (46.2% versus 13.8%; crude odds ratio [OR] 5.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-15.67) and those with Tokyo grade III disease (41.9% versus 13.2%; crude OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.63-13.81). No statistically significant difference was detected between the positive-culture and no-growth groups in treatment modification (24.2% versus 23.7%), in-hospital adverse events (24.2% versus 31.6%), 30-day mortality (12.1% versus 13.2%) or 90-day mortality among evaluable patients (6/32 [18.8%] versus 10/37 [27.0%]).
Conclusion: Bile obtained during PC had a substantial microbiological yield and grew predominantly enteric organisms. Treatment modification was more frequent in clinically severe disease, but no statistically significant difference was detected between positive-culture and no-growth groups. Bile culture should inform a structured reassessment of antimicrobials after source control, rather than automatic treatment escalation.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas.
A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal.
As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.