Biliary Microbiology and Antimicrobial Treatment Modification in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2026-10-06 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S638067
Berkan Acar, Ali Muhtaroğlu, Selman Alkan, Elif Yılmaz, Serdar Acar, Yavuz Çekiç, Mehmet Yıldız
{"title":"Biliary Microbiology and Antimicrobial Treatment Modification in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Berkan Acar, Ali Muhtaroğlu, Selman Alkan, Elif Yılmaz, Serdar Acar, Yavuz Çekiç, Mehmet Yıldız","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S638067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe bile culture yield, organism distribution and antimicrobial treatment modification in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for acute cholecystitis who were unsuitable for early cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 84 consecutive patients who underwent PC between December 2021 and December 2025. Index bile cultures were classified as positive, no growth, or not obtained. We analysed organisms, polymicrobial growth, empirical antimicrobial therapy, treatment modification and clinical outcomes by culture status and disease severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bile was cultured in 71 patients (84.5%), and 33 cultures were positive (46.5% of sampled patients; 39.3% of the cohort). Seven positive cultures (21.2%) were polymicrobial. The leading isolates were <i>Escherichia coli</i> (n=13), <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> (n=9) and <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (n=8). Ceftriaxone plus metronidazole was the most common empirical regimen (52/84, 61.9%). Treatment was modified in 20 patients (23.8%); half of the modified regimens contained a carbapenem. Modification was more frequent among patients requiring intensive care (46.2% versus 13.8%; crude odds ratio [OR] 5.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-15.67) and those with Tokyo grade III disease (41.9% versus 13.2%; crude OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.63-13.81). No statistically significant difference was detected between the positive-culture and no-growth groups in treatment modification (24.2% versus 23.7%), in-hospital adverse events (24.2% versus 31.6%), 30-day mortality (12.1% versus 13.2%) or 90-day mortality among evaluable patients (6/32 [18.8%] versus 10/37 [27.0%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bile obtained during PC had a substantial microbiological yield and grew predominantly enteric organisms. Treatment modification was more frequent in clinically severe disease, but no statistically significant difference was detected between positive-culture and no-growth groups. Bile culture should inform a structured reassessment of antimicrobials after source control, rather than automatic treatment escalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"19 ","pages":"638067"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13653542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S638067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe bile culture yield, organism distribution and antimicrobial treatment modification in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for acute cholecystitis who were unsuitable for early cholecystectomy.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 84 consecutive patients who underwent PC between December 2021 and December 2025. Index bile cultures were classified as positive, no growth, or not obtained. We analysed organisms, polymicrobial growth, empirical antimicrobial therapy, treatment modification and clinical outcomes by culture status and disease severity.

Results: Bile was cultured in 71 patients (84.5%), and 33 cultures were positive (46.5% of sampled patients; 39.3% of the cohort). Seven positive cultures (21.2%) were polymicrobial. The leading isolates were Escherichia coli (n=13), Enterococcus faecium (n=9) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=8). Ceftriaxone plus metronidazole was the most common empirical regimen (52/84, 61.9%). Treatment was modified in 20 patients (23.8%); half of the modified regimens contained a carbapenem. Modification was more frequent among patients requiring intensive care (46.2% versus 13.8%; crude odds ratio [OR] 5.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.83-15.67) and those with Tokyo grade III disease (41.9% versus 13.2%; crude OR 4.75, 95% CI 1.63-13.81). No statistically significant difference was detected between the positive-culture and no-growth groups in treatment modification (24.2% versus 23.7%), in-hospital adverse events (24.2% versus 31.6%), 30-day mortality (12.1% versus 13.2%) or 90-day mortality among evaluable patients (6/32 [18.8%] versus 10/37 [27.0%]).

Conclusion: Bile obtained during PC had a substantial microbiological yield and grew predominantly enteric organisms. Treatment modification was more frequent in clinically severe disease, but no statistically significant difference was detected between positive-culture and no-growth groups. Bile culture should inform a structured reassessment of antimicrobials after source control, rather than automatic treatment escalation.

急性胆囊炎经皮胆囊造瘘患者的胆道微生物学和抗菌药物治疗:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书