Dating Violence in Adolescence: An Exploratory Study on Personality Traits, Legitimizing Attitudes and Prevalence.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Sancho Rosário, Sónia Caridade, Carla Gouveia, Ana Cristina Saial, Alda Portugal
{"title":"Dating Violence in Adolescence: An Exploratory Study on Personality Traits, Legitimizing Attitudes and Prevalence.","authors":"Sancho Rosário, Sónia Caridade, Carla Gouveia, Ana Cristina Saial, Alda Portugal","doi":"10.1177/08862605261480136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dating violence is recognized as a global priority for research and intervention. Although legitimizing attitudes toward dating violence and personality traits are considered risk factors, their joint contribution to adolescent dating violence remains limited. This study aimed to characterize the prevalence of dating violence among adolescents and its associations with legitimizing attitudes, neuroticism and agreeableness. The study included 410 Portuguese adolescents aged 14 to 19 years (<i>M</i> = 17.18, <i>SD</i> = 1.39). Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory-Short Form, the Attitudes Toward Dating Violence Scale and the Mini International Personality Item Pool. Results showed that 57.3% of adolescent reported perpetrating at least one form of dating violence and 58.9% reported victimization, with verbal/emotional violence being the most prevalent subtype. No significant gender, developmental stage, or interaction effects was found for overall dating violence perpetration and victimization. However, significant main effects of gender and developmental stage, as well as significant gender × developmental stage interactions, were observed for legitimizing attitudes toward psychological and physical dating violence. Boys reported higher legitimizing attitudes than girls during middle adolescence, whereas no gender differences were observed during late adolescence. Moreover, only boys showed a significant decline in legitimizing attitudes from middle to late adolescence. Perpetration and victimization were positively associated. Neuroticism and agreeableness were associated with perpetration, but only neuroticism was associated with victimization. Legitimizing attitudes explained additional variance beyond traits. These findings support prevention programs targeting violence-supportive beliefs during adolescence and inform future research on the interplay among personality traits, legitimizing attitudes and dating violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":" ","pages":"8862605261480136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261480136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dating violence is recognized as a global priority for research and intervention. Although legitimizing attitudes toward dating violence and personality traits are considered risk factors, their joint contribution to adolescent dating violence remains limited. This study aimed to characterize the prevalence of dating violence among adolescents and its associations with legitimizing attitudes, neuroticism and agreeableness. The study included 410 Portuguese adolescents aged 14 to 19 years (M = 17.18, SD = 1.39). Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory-Short Form, the Attitudes Toward Dating Violence Scale and the Mini International Personality Item Pool. Results showed that 57.3% of adolescent reported perpetrating at least one form of dating violence and 58.9% reported victimization, with verbal/emotional violence being the most prevalent subtype. No significant gender, developmental stage, or interaction effects was found for overall dating violence perpetration and victimization. However, significant main effects of gender and developmental stage, as well as significant gender × developmental stage interactions, were observed for legitimizing attitudes toward psychological and physical dating violence. Boys reported higher legitimizing attitudes than girls during middle adolescence, whereas no gender differences were observed during late adolescence. Moreover, only boys showed a significant decline in legitimizing attitudes from middle to late adolescence. Perpetration and victimization were positively associated. Neuroticism and agreeableness were associated with perpetration, but only neuroticism was associated with victimization. Legitimizing attitudes explained additional variance beyond traits. These findings support prevention programs targeting violence-supportive beliefs during adolescence and inform future research on the interplay among personality traits, legitimizing attitudes and dating violence.

青少年约会暴力:人格特质、合法化态度和流行程度的探索性研究。
约会暴力被认为是研究和干预的全球优先事项。虽然对约会暴力的合法态度和个性特征被认为是危险因素,但它们对青少年约会暴力的共同贡献仍然有限。本研究旨在描述青少年约会暴力的普遍性及其与合法化态度、神经质和亲和性的关系。该研究包括410名14 - 19岁的葡萄牙青少年(M = 17.18, SD = 1.39)。参与者完成了社会人口学调查问卷、青少年约会关系冲突短表、约会暴力态度量表和迷你国际人格项目库。结果显示,57.3%的青少年报告犯下至少一种形式的约会暴力,58.9%的青少年报告受害,言语/情感暴力是最普遍的亚型。没有发现明显的性别、发育阶段或相互作用对约会暴力的总体实施和受害有影响。然而,性别和发展阶段的显著主要影响,以及显著的性别与发展阶段的相互作用,被观察到对心理和身体约会暴力的态度合法化。在青春期中期,男孩比女孩报告了更高的合法化态度,而在青春期后期,没有观察到性别差异。此外,只有男孩在青春期中后期的合法化态度上有明显的下降。犯罪与受害呈正相关。神经质和宜人性与犯罪有关,但只有神经质与受害有关。合法化的态度解释了特质之外的额外差异。这些发现支持了针对青少年暴力支持信念的预防计划,并为未来关于人格特质、合法化态度和约会暴力之间相互作用的研究提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
375
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书