The impact of ventilation mode on systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction in a porcine model of abdominal sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.

IF 2.9 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
James G Williams, Michaela Kollisch-Singule, Nirmeen Elmadany, Nader M Habashi, Gary F Nieman, Brian M Varisco
{"title":"The impact of ventilation mode on systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction in a porcine model of abdominal sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.","authors":"James G Williams, Michaela Kollisch-Singule, Nirmeen Elmadany, Nader M Habashi, Gary F Nieman, Brian M Varisco","doi":"10.1186/s40635-026-00985-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sepsis commonly causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and immune hyperactivation may be a causal link. Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is common in ARDS, and VILI may potentiate organ dysfunction in severe sepsis. We used a porcine model of abdominal sepsis-associated ARDS to test whether ventilation strategy could impact systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Female Yorkshire pigs (6-8 months) underwent ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury of the small bowel and fecal clot implantation or sham laparotomy. The abdominal sepsis animals were ventilated with a volume-controlled (VC) mode using the ARDS-Net low tidal volume (LVt) method to set and adjust the mode, and applied at two time points. Late LVt, was applied once PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> was ≤300, and Early LVt was applied immediately following injury. The third lung protective group used the airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode set and adjusted with the time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) method, also applied immediately after injury. Animals were supported for 48 h using standardized resuscitation protocols and euthanized. Physiologic variables, clinical lab data, lung histology, and plasma proteome were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sham animals showed no evidence of sepsis or ARDS, whereas all experimental animals developed septic shock, requiring fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. Both LVt groups developed ARDS as measured by PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio by the study end (Late LVt: 129.9±16.0; Early LVt: 205.2±24.2), while the Early APRV group did not (429.4±59.4). The Sham and experimental groups all had similar proteomes at baseline. The proteomes diverged over time and ended in three distinct groups: Sham, Late LVt/Early LVt, and Early APRV. The most significantly differentially expressed proteins distinguishing the groups were involved in the immune and inflammatory response, with APRV having the lowest inflammatory signature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a porcine model of abdominal septic shock we found that animals ventilated with a higher mean airway pressure strategy (APRV) had decreased plasma proteomic signatures of inflammation compared to those ventilated with a conventional low tidal volume strategy. Our findings are hypothesis generating and not directly translatable to the clinical setting. Future studies should focus on further elucidating a link between VILI and its effect on systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13653911/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-026-00985-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis commonly causes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and immune hyperactivation may be a causal link. Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is common in ARDS, and VILI may potentiate organ dysfunction in severe sepsis. We used a porcine model of abdominal sepsis-associated ARDS to test whether ventilation strategy could impact systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction.

Methods: Female Yorkshire pigs (6-8 months) underwent ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury of the small bowel and fecal clot implantation or sham laparotomy. The abdominal sepsis animals were ventilated with a volume-controlled (VC) mode using the ARDS-Net low tidal volume (LVt) method to set and adjust the mode, and applied at two time points. Late LVt, was applied once PaO2/FiO2 was ≤300, and Early LVt was applied immediately following injury. The third lung protective group used the airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) mode set and adjusted with the time-controlled adaptive ventilation (TCAV) method, also applied immediately after injury. Animals were supported for 48 h using standardized resuscitation protocols and euthanized. Physiologic variables, clinical lab data, lung histology, and plasma proteome were assessed.

Results: Sham animals showed no evidence of sepsis or ARDS, whereas all experimental animals developed septic shock, requiring fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. Both LVt groups developed ARDS as measured by PaO2/FiO2 ratio by the study end (Late LVt: 129.9±16.0; Early LVt: 205.2±24.2), while the Early APRV group did not (429.4±59.4). The Sham and experimental groups all had similar proteomes at baseline. The proteomes diverged over time and ended in three distinct groups: Sham, Late LVt/Early LVt, and Early APRV. The most significantly differentially expressed proteins distinguishing the groups were involved in the immune and inflammatory response, with APRV having the lowest inflammatory signature.

Conclusion: In a porcine model of abdominal septic shock we found that animals ventilated with a higher mean airway pressure strategy (APRV) had decreased plasma proteomic signatures of inflammation compared to those ventilated with a conventional low tidal volume strategy. Our findings are hypothesis generating and not directly translatable to the clinical setting. Future studies should focus on further elucidating a link between VILI and its effect on systemic inflammation and organ dysfunction.

通气模式对猪腹部败血症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征模型全身炎症和器官功能障碍的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书