Exploring the evidence for use of cefiderocol as part of combination therapies: a systematic review of in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Marco Meroi, Juan Antonio Del Castillo Polo, Rebecca Scardellato, Alessandra Nazeri, Alessia Savoldi, Renata Da Costa, Laura Piddock, Jennifer Cohn, Evelina Tacconelli, Matteo Morra, Elda Righi
{"title":"Exploring the evidence for use of cefiderocol as part of combination therapies: a systematic review of in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies.","authors":"Marco Meroi, Juan Antonio Del Castillo Polo, Rebecca Scardellato, Alessandra Nazeri, Alessia Savoldi, Renata Da Costa, Laura Piddock, Jennifer Cohn, Evelina Tacconelli, Matteo Morra, Elda Righi","doi":"10.1016/j.jgar.2026.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin with potent activity against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). While monotherapy is recommended for susceptible Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the role of cefiderocol-based combination therapy remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence supporting cefiderocol combination regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, ESCMID global and IDWeek sources (January 2015-January 2025) were systematically searched for in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies evaluating cefiderocol-based combinations. Randomised trials, observational studies and preclinical synergy studies were included. An exploratory random-effects meta-analysis compared cefiderocol monotherapy with combination therapy for mortality, clinical cure and microbiological eradication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven studies were included (34 in vitro, 5 in vivo and 31 clinical). Preclinical data showed enhanced cefiderocol activity when combined with β-lactamase inhibitors, tetracyclines and selected β-lactams, with in vivo models supporting improved bacterial killing and survival for selected combinations. Clinical studies were heterogeneous and frequently confounded. Combination therapy showed no consistent advantage over monotherapy for clinical cure or microbiological eradication, while mortality estimates were highly variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cefiderocol combinations show biologically plausible synergy in preclinical models, but current clinical evidence is limited and largely observational, failing to identify combinations that reliably improve patient-centred outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global antimicrobial resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2026.09.016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin with potent activity against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). While monotherapy is recommended for susceptible Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the role of cefiderocol-based combination therapy remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence supporting cefiderocol combination regimens.

Methods: MEDLINE, ESCMID global and IDWeek sources (January 2015-January 2025) were systematically searched for in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies evaluating cefiderocol-based combinations. Randomised trials, observational studies and preclinical synergy studies were included. An exploratory random-effects meta-analysis compared cefiderocol monotherapy with combination therapy for mortality, clinical cure and microbiological eradication.

Results: Sixty-seven studies were included (34 in vitro, 5 in vivo and 31 clinical). Preclinical data showed enhanced cefiderocol activity when combined with β-lactamase inhibitors, tetracyclines and selected β-lactams, with in vivo models supporting improved bacterial killing and survival for selected combinations. Clinical studies were heterogeneous and frequently confounded. Combination therapy showed no consistent advantage over monotherapy for clinical cure or microbiological eradication, while mortality estimates were highly variable.

Conclusions: Cefiderocol combinations show biologically plausible synergy in preclinical models, but current clinical evidence is limited and largely observational, failing to identify combinations that reliably improve patient-centred outcomes.

探索使用头孢地罗作为联合治疗的一部分的证据:对体外、体内和临床研究的系统回顾。
背景:头孢德罗是一种含铁的头孢菌素,对耐碳青霉烯革兰氏阴性菌(CR-GNB)具有有效的活性。虽然单药治疗被推荐用于易感肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌,但头孢地冷联合治疗的作用仍不确定。我们对支持头孢地罗联合用药的临床前和临床证据进行了系统回顾。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、ESCMID global和IDWeek来源(2015年1月- 2025年1月),检索体外、体内和临床评价头孢地洛科尔联合用药的研究。包括随机试验、观察性研究和临床前协同研究。一项探索性随机效应荟萃分析比较了头孢地罗单药治疗与联合治疗在死亡率、临床治愈率和微生物根除方面的差异。结果:共纳入67项研究(34项体外研究,5项体内研究,31项临床研究)。临床前数据显示,当与β-内酰胺酶抑制剂、四环素和选定的β-内酰胺类药物联合使用时,头孢地罗的活性增强,体内模型支持选定组合改善细菌杀灭和存活。临床研究是异质的,经常混淆。在临床治愈或微生物根除方面,联合治疗没有显示出优于单一治疗的一致优势,而死亡率估计也存在很大差异。结论:Cefiderocol联合用药在临床前模型中显示出生物学上合理的协同作用,但目前的临床证据有限,而且主要是观察性的,无法确定联合用药是否能可靠地改善以患者为中心的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance (JGAR) is a quarterly online journal run by an international Editorial Board that focuses on the global spread of antibiotic-resistant microbes. JGAR is a dedicated journal for all professionals working in research, health care, the environment and animal infection control, aiming to track the resistance threat worldwide and provides a single voice devoted to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Featuring peer-reviewed and up to date research articles, reviews, short notes and hot topics JGAR covers the key topics related to antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiparasitic resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书