Reassessing host genetic susceptibility to tick-borne encephalitis: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Piyush Gampawar, Daniel Ruzek, Benno Kohlmaier, Markus Seidel, Werner Zenz
{"title":"Reassessing host genetic susceptibility to tick-borne encephalitis: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Piyush Gampawar, Daniel Ruzek, Benno Kohlmaier, Markus Seidel, Werner Zenz","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2026.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Host genetic factors have been proposed to influence susceptibility to tick-borne encephalitis (TBE), but findings from candidate-gene association studies have been inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate evidence for common genetic variants associated with TBE susceptibility and severity by synthesising candidate-gene and genome-wide association study (GWAS) data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data source: PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2005 and December 2025 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Case-control studies of laboratory-confirmed TBE reporting genotype or allele frequencies sufficient to estimate effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The review included 16 candidate-gene studies and one European consortium GWAS, comprising 3,759 patients with TBE (1,521 mild; 1,454 severe) and 11,771 controls from nine countries. Assessment of risk of bias: Methodological quality was assessed using the Q-Genie tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>of data synthesis: Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for variants investigated in ≥4 datasets. Heterogeneity, publication bias, subgroup analyses, and minimum detectable odds ratios (MDORs) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four variants met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. No significant associations with TBE susceptibility were observed for CCR5 rs333 (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.98-1.29), TLR3 rs3775291 (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.68-1.10), IL10 rs1800872 (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.88-1.08), or CD209 rs2287886 (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.80-1.15). Analyses of severe disease yielded similarly null results. MDOR analyses indicated adequate power to detect moderate genetic effects (OR≈1.12-1.18), indicating that any true effects are likely to be small.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides the most comprehensive synthesis of TBE genetic association studies to date and demonstrates that the most extensively investigated genetic variants are unlikely to serve as clinically useful predictors of TBE susceptibility or severity, supporting genome-wide discovery, rare variant analyses, and integrative approaches to identify biologically relevant host determinants of TBE.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2026.10.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Host genetic factors have been proposed to influence susceptibility to tick-borne encephalitis (TBE), but findings from candidate-gene association studies have been inconsistent.

Objective: To evaluate evidence for common genetic variants associated with TBE susceptibility and severity by synthesising candidate-gene and genome-wide association study (GWAS) data.

Methods: Data source: PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2005 and December 2025 following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

Study eligibility criteria: Case-control studies of laboratory-confirmed TBE reporting genotype or allele frequencies sufficient to estimate effect sizes.

Participants: The review included 16 candidate-gene studies and one European consortium GWAS, comprising 3,759 patients with TBE (1,521 mild; 1,454 severe) and 11,771 controls from nine countries. Assessment of risk of bias: Methodological quality was assessed using the Q-Genie tool.

Methods: of data synthesis: Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for variants investigated in ≥4 datasets. Heterogeneity, publication bias, subgroup analyses, and minimum detectable odds ratios (MDORs) were assessed.

Results: Four variants met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. No significant associations with TBE susceptibility were observed for CCR5 rs333 (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.98-1.29), TLR3 rs3775291 (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.68-1.10), IL10 rs1800872 (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.88-1.08), or CD209 rs2287886 (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.80-1.15). Analyses of severe disease yielded similarly null results. MDOR analyses indicated adequate power to detect moderate genetic effects (OR≈1.12-1.18), indicating that any true effects are likely to be small.

Conclusions: This study provides the most comprehensive synthesis of TBE genetic association studies to date and demonstrates that the most extensively investigated genetic variants are unlikely to serve as clinically useful predictors of TBE susceptibility or severity, supporting genome-wide discovery, rare variant analyses, and integrative approaches to identify biologically relevant host determinants of TBE.

重新评估宿主对蜱传脑炎的遗传易感性:来自系统评价和荟萃分析的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书