Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Multivessel Disease and STEMI

IF 12.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Daniel O'Callaghan MB, MCh, Himanshu Rai PhD, Daniele Giacoppo MD, MSc, PhD, J.J. Coughlan MB, BCh, MD, Róisín Colleran MB, BCh, PhD, Rory Durand MB, BCh, Mark S. Spence MB, BCh, MD, Mark Kennedy MB, BCh, MD, Gavin J. Blake MB, BCh, MD, Colm G. Hanratty MB, BCh, MD, Adnan Kastrati MD, Robert A. Byrne MB, BCh, PhD
{"title":"Immediate Versus Staged Complete Revascularization in Multivessel Disease and STEMI","authors":"Daniel O'Callaghan MB, MCh,&nbsp;Himanshu Rai PhD,&nbsp;Daniele Giacoppo MD, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;J.J. Coughlan MB, BCh, MD,&nbsp;Róisín Colleran MB, BCh, PhD,&nbsp;Rory Durand MB, BCh,&nbsp;Mark S. Spence MB, BCh, MD,&nbsp;Mark Kennedy MB, BCh, MD,&nbsp;Gavin J. Blake MB, BCh, MD,&nbsp;Colm G. Hanratty MB, BCh, MD,&nbsp;Adnan Kastrati MD,&nbsp;Robert A. Byrne MB, BCh, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcin.2026.07.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>For patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease, complete revascularization is recommended. The timing of nonculprit lesion intervention, either immediately during the index procedure or staged at a later time, has been investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study sought to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs comparing immediate vs staged complete revascularization in patients with multivessel disease presenting with STEMI.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a frequentist, pairwise meta-analysis. Studies were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: multicenter RCTs comparing immediate vs staged nonculprit revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI; exclusive use of second-generation (or newer) drug-eluting stents; a follow-up duration of ≥1 year; and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality, whereas secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, and unplanned revascularization. Summary estimates were computed using random-effects models with inverse-variance weighting based on trial-level HRs and 95% CIs. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251124207).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After a systematic search, 4 randomized trials comprising 2,651 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of all-cause death at 1-year was higher with immediate complete revascularization (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.02-2.21; <em>P</em> = 0.04; prediction interval [PI]: 0.80-2.81; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0%; <em>t</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0). Immediate complete revascularization reduced the risk of recurrent MI when using the protocol specified definitions which included procedural MI (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.36-0.94; <em>P</em> = 0.02; PI: 0.22-1.54; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0%; <em>t</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.034) but did not reduce risk of spontaneous MI (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.55-1.48; <em>P</em> = 0.90; PI: 0.41-2.00; <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0%; τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.00). The risk of cardiac death and unplanned revascularization was comparable between the treatment groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In STEMI and multivessel disease, immediate complete revascularization may be associated with an increased risk of all-cause death at 1-year when compared with staged complete revascularization. The treatment effect on mortality should be interpreted cautiously because of the relatively low number of deaths across the 4 trials and the statistical fragility of the findings. The findings from this analysis do not support an immediate complete revascularization strategy in these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14688,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":"19 19","pages":"Pages 2589-2600"},"PeriodicalIF":12.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879826023186","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

For patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease, complete revascularization is recommended. The timing of nonculprit lesion intervention, either immediately during the index procedure or staged at a later time, has been investigated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Objectives

This study sought to perform a meta-analysis of RCTs comparing immediate vs staged complete revascularization in patients with multivessel disease presenting with STEMI.

Methods

We conducted a frequentist, pairwise meta-analysis. Studies were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: multicenter RCTs comparing immediate vs staged nonculprit revascularization in patients presenting with STEMI; exclusive use of second-generation (or newer) drug-eluting stents; a follow-up duration of ≥1 year; and publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality, whereas secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, and unplanned revascularization. Summary estimates were computed using random-effects models with inverse-variance weighting based on trial-level HRs and 95% CIs. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD420251124207).

Results

After a systematic search, 4 randomized trials comprising 2,651 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of all-cause death at 1-year was higher with immediate complete revascularization (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.02-2.21; P = 0.04; prediction interval [PI]: 0.80-2.81; I2 = 0%; t2 = 0). Immediate complete revascularization reduced the risk of recurrent MI when using the protocol specified definitions which included procedural MI (HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.36-0.94; P = 0.02; PI: 0.22-1.54; I2 = 0%; t2 = 0.034) but did not reduce risk of spontaneous MI (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.55-1.48; P = 0.90; PI: 0.41-2.00; I2 = 0%; τ2 = 0.00). The risk of cardiac death and unplanned revascularization was comparable between the treatment groups.

Conclusions

In STEMI and multivessel disease, immediate complete revascularization may be associated with an increased risk of all-cause death at 1-year when compared with staged complete revascularization. The treatment effect on mortality should be interpreted cautiously because of the relatively low number of deaths across the 4 trials and the statistical fragility of the findings. The findings from this analysis do not support an immediate complete revascularization strategy in these patients.
多血管疾病和STEMI的立即与分期完全血运重建术:随机试验的荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.80%
发文量
756
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions is a specialist journal launched by the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It covers the entire field of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including cardiac, peripheral, and cerebrovascular interventions. The journal publishes studies that will impact the practice of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including clinical trials, experimental studies, and in-depth discussions by respected experts. To enhance visual understanding, the journal is published both in print and electronically, utilizing the latest technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书